对未来教育的畅想和想象:芬兰师范教育工作者的见解

Henriikka Vartiainen, Teemu Valtonen, J. Kahila, M. Tedre
{"title":"对未来教育的畅想和想象:芬兰师范教育工作者的见解","authors":"Henriikka Vartiainen, Teemu Valtonen, J. Kahila, M. Tedre","doi":"10.1108/ils-10-2023-0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn 2022 generative AI took the Internet world by storm. Free access to tools that can generate text and images that pass for human creations triggered fiery debates about the potential uses and misuses of generative AI in education. There has risen a need to check the popular utopian and dystopian narratives about AI against the diversity of hopes, concerns and future imaginaries that educators themselves associate with generative AI. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perspectives of Finnish teacher educators on the use of AI in education.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis article reports findings from a hands-on workshop in teacher training, where participants learned about how generative AI works, collaboratively explored generative AI and then reflected on its potential and challenges.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results reveal nuanced, calm and thoughtful imaginaries rooted in deep understanding of educational policy, evaluation and the sociocultural context of education. The results cover teachers’ views on the impact of AI on learners’ agency, metacognition, self-regulation and more.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis article offers a unique exploration into the perceptions and imaginaries of educators regarding generative AI in specific (instead of “monolithic AI”), moving beyond dystopian views and instead focusing on the potential of AI to align with existing pedagogical practices. The educators contrasted the common techno-deterministic narratives and perceived AI as an avenue to support formative assessment practices and development of metacognition, self-regulation, responsibility and well-being. The novel insights also include the need for AI education that critically incorporates social and ethical viewpoints and fosters visions for a future with culturally, socially and environmentally sustainable AI.\n","PeriodicalId":504986,"journal":{"name":"Information and Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT and imaginaries of the future of education: insights of Finnish teacher educators\",\"authors\":\"Henriikka Vartiainen, Teemu Valtonen, J. Kahila, M. Tedre\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ils-10-2023-0146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIn 2022 generative AI took the Internet world by storm. Free access to tools that can generate text and images that pass for human creations triggered fiery debates about the potential uses and misuses of generative AI in education. There has risen a need to check the popular utopian and dystopian narratives about AI against the diversity of hopes, concerns and future imaginaries that educators themselves associate with generative AI. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perspectives of Finnish teacher educators on the use of AI in education.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis article reports findings from a hands-on workshop in teacher training, where participants learned about how generative AI works, collaboratively explored generative AI and then reflected on its potential and challenges.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results reveal nuanced, calm and thoughtful imaginaries rooted in deep understanding of educational policy, evaluation and the sociocultural context of education. The results cover teachers’ views on the impact of AI on learners’ agency, metacognition, self-regulation and more.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis article offers a unique exploration into the perceptions and imaginaries of educators regarding generative AI in specific (instead of “monolithic AI”), moving beyond dystopian views and instead focusing on the potential of AI to align with existing pedagogical practices. The educators contrasted the common techno-deterministic narratives and perceived AI as an avenue to support formative assessment practices and development of metacognition, self-regulation, responsibility and well-being. The novel insights also include the need for AI education that critically incorporates social and ethical viewpoints and fosters visions for a future with culturally, socially and environmentally sustainable AI.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":504986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Learning Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Learning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-10-2023-0146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-10-2023-0146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 2022 年,生成式人工智能在互联网世界掀起了一场风暴。人们可以免费获取能够生成媲美人类作品的文本和图像的工具,这引发了关于生成式人工智能在教育领域的潜在用途和误用的激烈辩论。人们开始需要对照教育工作者自己对生成式人工智能的各种希望、关切和未来想象,来检验关于人工智能的乌托邦式和乌托邦式的流行说法。本研究的目的是调查芬兰师范教育工作者对人工智能在教育中的应用的看法。本文报告了一个教师培训实践研讨会的结果,与会者在研讨会上了解了生成式人工智能的工作原理,合作探索了生成式人工智能,然后对其潜力和挑战进行了反思。研究结果结果显示了细微、冷静和深思熟虑的想象,这些想象植根于对教育政策、评估和教育的社会文化背景的深刻理解。结果涵盖了教师对人工智能对学习者的能动性、元认知、自我调节等方面的影响的看法。原创性/价值这篇文章对教育工作者对具体的生成性人工智能(而非 "单一人工智能")的看法和想象进行了独特的探索,超越了乌托邦式的观点,转而关注人工智能与现有教学实践相结合的潜力。教育工作者对比了常见的技术决定论叙事,认为人工智能是支持形成性评估实践和发展元认知、自我调节、责任感和幸福感的途径。新颖的见解还包括,人工智能教育需要批判性地纳入社会和伦理观点,并培养对未来人工智能在文化、社会和环境方面可持续发展的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ChatGPT and imaginaries of the future of education: insights of Finnish teacher educators
Purpose In 2022 generative AI took the Internet world by storm. Free access to tools that can generate text and images that pass for human creations triggered fiery debates about the potential uses and misuses of generative AI in education. There has risen a need to check the popular utopian and dystopian narratives about AI against the diversity of hopes, concerns and future imaginaries that educators themselves associate with generative AI. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perspectives of Finnish teacher educators on the use of AI in education. Design/methodology/approach This article reports findings from a hands-on workshop in teacher training, where participants learned about how generative AI works, collaboratively explored generative AI and then reflected on its potential and challenges. Findings The results reveal nuanced, calm and thoughtful imaginaries rooted in deep understanding of educational policy, evaluation and the sociocultural context of education. The results cover teachers’ views on the impact of AI on learners’ agency, metacognition, self-regulation and more. Originality/value This article offers a unique exploration into the perceptions and imaginaries of educators regarding generative AI in specific (instead of “monolithic AI”), moving beyond dystopian views and instead focusing on the potential of AI to align with existing pedagogical practices. The educators contrasted the common techno-deterministic narratives and perceived AI as an avenue to support formative assessment practices and development of metacognition, self-regulation, responsibility and well-being. The novel insights also include the need for AI education that critically incorporates social and ethical viewpoints and fosters visions for a future with culturally, socially and environmentally sustainable AI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信