胰腺病变鉴别诊断中用于微血管成像的无对比增强内窥镜超声波检查。

Yasunobu Yamashita, Hirofumi Yamazaki, Akiya Nakahata, Toshio Shimokawa, Takaaki Tamura, Yuki Kawaji, Takashi Tamura, Keiichi Hatamaru, Masahiro Itonaga, Reiko Ashida, Masayuki Kitano
{"title":"胰腺病变鉴别诊断中用于微血管成像的无对比增强内窥镜超声波检查。","authors":"Yasunobu Yamashita, Hirofumi Yamazaki, Akiya Nakahata, Toshio Shimokawa, Takaaki Tamura, Yuki Kawaji, Takashi Tamura, Keiichi Hatamaru, Masahiro Itonaga, Reiko Ashida, Masayuki Kitano","doi":"10.1111/den.14889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Detective flow imaging endoscopic ultrasonography (DFI-EUS) is a recent imaging modality developed for detecting fine vessels without the need for ultrasound contrast agents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of DFI-EUS for solid pancreatic lesions and to compare the diagnostic ability for pancreatic cancer (PC) between DFI-EUS, directional power Doppler (eFLOW) EUS, and contrast-enhanced harmonic (CH)-EUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a pancreatic lesion who underwent DFI-EUS, eFLOW-EUS, and CH-EUS between March 2019 and November 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Final diagnoses were confirmed by pathologic examination of EUS-guided tissue acquisition and/or resected specimens. Lesions were categorized into the three patterns of poor, mild, and rich vascularity on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and hypo-, iso-, and hypervascular on CH-EUS. PC was defined as a poor pattern on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and a hypovascular pattern on CH-EUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final diagnoses of 90 examined tumors were PC (n = 57), inflammatory mass (n = 6), autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 13), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 9), and others (n = 5). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of PC were 93%, 82%, and 88%, respectively, on DFI-EUS, 97%, 42%, and 77% on eFLOW-EUS, and 95%, 89%, and 92% on CH-EUS. The accuracy of DFI-EUS was significantly superior to eFLOW-EUS (P = 0.005), but no significant difference was found between DFI-EUS and CH-EUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DFI-EUS is more sensitive for depicting vasculature than eFLOW-EUS, and has higher diagnostic sensitivity for PC. Evaluation of vascularity on DFI-EUS is useful for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions without the need for intravenous contrast agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic ultrasonography for microvascular imaging without contrast enhancement in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Yasunobu Yamashita, Hirofumi Yamazaki, Akiya Nakahata, Toshio Shimokawa, Takaaki Tamura, Yuki Kawaji, Takashi Tamura, Keiichi Hatamaru, Masahiro Itonaga, Reiko Ashida, Masayuki Kitano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.14889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Detective flow imaging endoscopic ultrasonography (DFI-EUS) is a recent imaging modality developed for detecting fine vessels without the need for ultrasound contrast agents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of DFI-EUS for solid pancreatic lesions and to compare the diagnostic ability for pancreatic cancer (PC) between DFI-EUS, directional power Doppler (eFLOW) EUS, and contrast-enhanced harmonic (CH)-EUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a pancreatic lesion who underwent DFI-EUS, eFLOW-EUS, and CH-EUS between March 2019 and November 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Final diagnoses were confirmed by pathologic examination of EUS-guided tissue acquisition and/or resected specimens. Lesions were categorized into the three patterns of poor, mild, and rich vascularity on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and hypo-, iso-, and hypervascular on CH-EUS. PC was defined as a poor pattern on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and a hypovascular pattern on CH-EUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final diagnoses of 90 examined tumors were PC (n = 57), inflammatory mass (n = 6), autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 13), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 9), and others (n = 5). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of PC were 93%, 82%, and 88%, respectively, on DFI-EUS, 97%, 42%, and 77% on eFLOW-EUS, and 95%, 89%, and 92% on CH-EUS. The accuracy of DFI-EUS was significantly superior to eFLOW-EUS (P = 0.005), but no significant difference was found between DFI-EUS and CH-EUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DFI-EUS is more sensitive for depicting vasculature than eFLOW-EUS, and has higher diagnostic sensitivity for PC. Evaluation of vascularity on DFI-EUS is useful for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions without the need for intravenous contrast agent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:侦测流成像内窥镜超声检查(DFI-EUS)是最近开发的一种成像模式,无需使用超声造影剂即可检测细小血管。本研究旨在评估 DFI-EUS 对胰腺实体病变的实用性,并比较 DFI-EUS、定向功率多普勒(eFLOW)EUS 和对比增强谐波(CH)-EUS 对胰腺癌(PC)的诊断能力:回顾性纳入2019年3月至2023年11月期间接受DFI-EUS、eFLOW-EUS和CH-EUS检查的胰腺病变患者。最终诊断由 EUS 引导的组织采集和/或切除标本的病理学检查确认。病变在DFI-EUS和eFLOW-EUS上被分为血管欠佳、轻度和丰富三种模式,在CH-EUS上被分为低血管、等血管和高血管三种模式。PC在DFI-EUS和eFLOW-EUS上被定义为血管形态差,在CH-EUS上被定义为血管形态低:90例受检肿瘤的最终诊断结果为PC(57例)、炎性肿块(6例)、自身免疫性胰腺炎(13例)、神经内分泌肿瘤(9例)和其他(5例)。DFI-EUS 诊断 PC 的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 93%、82% 和 88%,eFLOW-EUS 为 97%、42% 和 77%,CH-EUS 为 95%、89% 和 92%。DFI-EUS的准确性明显优于eFLOW-EUS(P = 0.005),但DFI-EUS与CH-EUS之间无明显差异:结论:DFI-EUS对血管的描绘比eFLOW-EUS更敏感,对PC的诊断敏感性更高。DFI-EUS 对血管的评估有助于胰腺病变的鉴别诊断,无需静脉注射造影剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic ultrasonography for microvascular imaging without contrast enhancement in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.

Objectives: Detective flow imaging endoscopic ultrasonography (DFI-EUS) is a recent imaging modality developed for detecting fine vessels without the need for ultrasound contrast agents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of DFI-EUS for solid pancreatic lesions and to compare the diagnostic ability for pancreatic cancer (PC) between DFI-EUS, directional power Doppler (eFLOW) EUS, and contrast-enhanced harmonic (CH)-EUS.

Methods: Patients with a pancreatic lesion who underwent DFI-EUS, eFLOW-EUS, and CH-EUS between March 2019 and November 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Final diagnoses were confirmed by pathologic examination of EUS-guided tissue acquisition and/or resected specimens. Lesions were categorized into the three patterns of poor, mild, and rich vascularity on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and hypo-, iso-, and hypervascular on CH-EUS. PC was defined as a poor pattern on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and a hypovascular pattern on CH-EUS.

Results: The final diagnoses of 90 examined tumors were PC (n = 57), inflammatory mass (n = 6), autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 13), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 9), and others (n = 5). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of PC were 93%, 82%, and 88%, respectively, on DFI-EUS, 97%, 42%, and 77% on eFLOW-EUS, and 95%, 89%, and 92% on CH-EUS. The accuracy of DFI-EUS was significantly superior to eFLOW-EUS (P = 0.005), but no significant difference was found between DFI-EUS and CH-EUS.

Conclusion: DFI-EUS is more sensitive for depicting vasculature than eFLOW-EUS, and has higher diagnostic sensitivity for PC. Evaluation of vascularity on DFI-EUS is useful for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions without the need for intravenous contrast agent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信