基于信息和通信技术的协调机制对跨级别临床协调的影响:范围综述。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241271854
Daniela Campaz-Landazábal, Ingrid Vargas, María-Luisa Vázquez
{"title":"基于信息和通信技术的协调机制对跨级别临床协调的影响:范围综述。","authors":"Daniela Campaz-Landazábal, Ingrid Vargas, María-Luisa Vázquez","doi":"10.1177/20552076241271854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coordination mechanisms based on information and communication technologies (ICTs) are gaining attention, especially since the pandemic, due to their potential to improve communication between health professionals. However, their impact on cross-level clinical coordination remains unclear. The aim is to synthesize the evidence on the impact of ICT-based coordination mechanisms on clinical coordination between primary care and secondary care (SC) doctors and to identify knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted by searching for original articles in six electronic databases and a manual search, with no restrictions regarding time, area, or methodology. Titles and abstracts were screened. Full texts of the selected articles were reviewed and analysed to assess the impact of each mechanism, according to the cross-level clinical coordination conceptual framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6555 articles identified, 30 met the inclusion criteria. All had been conducted in high-income countries, most (<i>n</i> = 26) evaluated the impact of a single mechanism - asynchronous electronic consultations via electronic health records (EHR) - and were limited in terms of design and types and dimensions of cross-level clinical coordination analysed. The evaluation of electronic consultations showed positive impacts on the appropriateness of referrals and accessibility to SC, yet the qualitative studies also highlighted potential risks. Studies on other mechanisms were scarce (shared EHR, email consultations) or non-existent (videoconferencing, mobile applications).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence of the impact of ICT-based mechanisms on clinical coordination between levels is limited. Rigorous evaluations are needed to inform policies and strategies for improving coordination between healthcare levels, thus contributing to high-quality, efficient healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11311193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of coordination mechanisms based on information and communication technologies on cross-level clinical coordination: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Campaz-Landazábal, Ingrid Vargas, María-Luisa Vázquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241271854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coordination mechanisms based on information and communication technologies (ICTs) are gaining attention, especially since the pandemic, due to their potential to improve communication between health professionals. However, their impact on cross-level clinical coordination remains unclear. The aim is to synthesize the evidence on the impact of ICT-based coordination mechanisms on clinical coordination between primary care and secondary care (SC) doctors and to identify knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted by searching for original articles in six electronic databases and a manual search, with no restrictions regarding time, area, or methodology. Titles and abstracts were screened. Full texts of the selected articles were reviewed and analysed to assess the impact of each mechanism, according to the cross-level clinical coordination conceptual framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6555 articles identified, 30 met the inclusion criteria. All had been conducted in high-income countries, most (<i>n</i> = 26) evaluated the impact of a single mechanism - asynchronous electronic consultations via electronic health records (EHR) - and were limited in terms of design and types and dimensions of cross-level clinical coordination analysed. The evaluation of electronic consultations showed positive impacts on the appropriateness of referrals and accessibility to SC, yet the qualitative studies also highlighted potential risks. Studies on other mechanisms were scarce (shared EHR, email consultations) or non-existent (videoconferencing, mobile applications).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence of the impact of ICT-based mechanisms on clinical coordination between levels is limited. Rigorous evaluations are needed to inform policies and strategies for improving coordination between healthcare levels, thus contributing to high-quality, efficient healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11311193/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241271854\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241271854","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于信息和通信技术(ICTs)的协调机制正日益受到关注,尤其是自大流行病以来,因为它们具有改善医疗专业人员之间沟通的潜力。然而,它们对跨级别临床协调的影响仍不明确。本研究旨在总结基于信息通信技术的协调机制对基层医疗机构和二级医疗机构(SC)医生之间临床协调的影响,并找出知识差距:方法:在六个电子数据库中搜索原始文章,并进行人工搜索,对时间、地区或方法不做限制,从而进行了范围界定综述。对文章标题和摘要进行了筛选。根据跨级别临床协调概念框架,对所选文章的全文进行了审查和分析,以评估每种机制的影响:在所确定的 6555 篇文章中,有 30 篇符合纳入标准。所有文章都是在高收入国家进行的,大多数文章(n = 26)评估了单一机制的影响--通过电子健康记录(EHR)进行异步电子会诊--并且在设计和所分析的跨级别临床协调的类型和维度方面受到了限制。对电子会诊的评估显示,电子会诊对转诊的适当性和 SC 的可及性产生了积极影响,但定性研究也强调了潜在的风险。关于其他机制的研究很少(共享电子病历、电子邮件会诊)或不存在(视频会议、移动应用程序):基于信息和通信技术的机制对各级临床协调的影响证据有限。需要进行严格的评估,为改善各级医疗机构之间协调的政策和战略提供信息,从而促进高质量、高效率的医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of coordination mechanisms based on information and communication technologies on cross-level clinical coordination: A scoping review.

Background: Coordination mechanisms based on information and communication technologies (ICTs) are gaining attention, especially since the pandemic, due to their potential to improve communication between health professionals. However, their impact on cross-level clinical coordination remains unclear. The aim is to synthesize the evidence on the impact of ICT-based coordination mechanisms on clinical coordination between primary care and secondary care (SC) doctors and to identify knowledge gaps.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted by searching for original articles in six electronic databases and a manual search, with no restrictions regarding time, area, or methodology. Titles and abstracts were screened. Full texts of the selected articles were reviewed and analysed to assess the impact of each mechanism, according to the cross-level clinical coordination conceptual framework.

Results: Of the 6555 articles identified, 30 met the inclusion criteria. All had been conducted in high-income countries, most (n = 26) evaluated the impact of a single mechanism - asynchronous electronic consultations via electronic health records (EHR) - and were limited in terms of design and types and dimensions of cross-level clinical coordination analysed. The evaluation of electronic consultations showed positive impacts on the appropriateness of referrals and accessibility to SC, yet the qualitative studies also highlighted potential risks. Studies on other mechanisms were scarce (shared EHR, email consultations) or non-existent (videoconferencing, mobile applications).

Conclusions: Evidence of the impact of ICT-based mechanisms on clinical coordination between levels is limited. Rigorous evaluations are needed to inform policies and strategies for improving coordination between healthcare levels, thus contributing to high-quality, efficient healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信