从医疗服务机构的角度看如何建立数字医疗生态系统:根据修改后的德尔菲法进行的专家访谈制定的分类法。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241271890
Robin Huettemann, Benedict Sevov, Sven Meister, Leonard Fehring
{"title":"从医疗服务机构的角度看如何建立数字医疗生态系统:根据修改后的德尔菲法进行的专家访谈制定的分类法。","authors":"Robin Huettemann, Benedict Sevov, Sven Meister, Leonard Fehring","doi":"10.1177/20552076241271890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Digital health ecosystems may be the next revolution in improving citizens' well-being, health delivery, data management, and health system processes, but solutions have not yet been broadly established. Reasons could be that health service-organizations have misaligned interests or lack capabilities. This study investigates reasons from a multi-health-service-organization perspective, differentiating between payers, insurers, healthcare providers, and innovators, detailing the expected value-adds, preferred participation roles, and required capabilities including a rating assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Findings are based on a taxonomy development methodology, which combines a literature review with semi-structured qualitative expert interviews, conducted using a modified Delphi approach. Interviews were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 21 experts across the four health service-organization groups were interviewed. The capability taxonomy includes a total of 16 capabilities, categorized in three themes: 'Health market', 'organizational', and 'technology and informatic'. Providers expect a value-add from strengthening their health process economics through efficiency gains but reveal the largest capability gaps, especially in 'interoperability' and 'platform'. Innovators' 'technology and informatic' capabilities complement well with those of payers for the 'health market'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We present a health service-organization-specific three-stage approach for establishing digital health ecosystems. Payers and insurers should address their 'technology and informatic' capability gaps, using technical enablers or forming new entities to reduce dependencies from legacy information technology systems. Innovators should clarify their monetization models and create positive awareness for their services, possibly entering the market directly. Providers must address interoperability issues and may require incentives to encourage their participation. Findings suggest governmental policymakers to prioritize three health policy initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11311194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to establish digital health ecosystems from the perspective of health service-organizations: A taxonomy developed based on expert interviews conducted as modified Delphi approach.\",\"authors\":\"Robin Huettemann, Benedict Sevov, Sven Meister, Leonard Fehring\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241271890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Digital health ecosystems may be the next revolution in improving citizens' well-being, health delivery, data management, and health system processes, but solutions have not yet been broadly established. Reasons could be that health service-organizations have misaligned interests or lack capabilities. This study investigates reasons from a multi-health-service-organization perspective, differentiating between payers, insurers, healthcare providers, and innovators, detailing the expected value-adds, preferred participation roles, and required capabilities including a rating assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Findings are based on a taxonomy development methodology, which combines a literature review with semi-structured qualitative expert interviews, conducted using a modified Delphi approach. Interviews were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 21 experts across the four health service-organization groups were interviewed. The capability taxonomy includes a total of 16 capabilities, categorized in three themes: 'Health market', 'organizational', and 'technology and informatic'. Providers expect a value-add from strengthening their health process economics through efficiency gains but reveal the largest capability gaps, especially in 'interoperability' and 'platform'. Innovators' 'technology and informatic' capabilities complement well with those of payers for the 'health market'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We present a health service-organization-specific three-stage approach for establishing digital health ecosystems. Payers and insurers should address their 'technology and informatic' capability gaps, using technical enablers or forming new entities to reduce dependencies from legacy information technology systems. Innovators should clarify their monetization models and create positive awareness for their services, possibly entering the market directly. Providers must address interoperability issues and may require incentives to encourage their participation. Findings suggest governmental policymakers to prioritize three health policy initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11311194/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241271890\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241271890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:数字医疗生态系统可能是改善公民福祉、医疗服务、数据管理和医疗系统流程的下一次革命,但解决方案尚未广泛确立。究其原因,可能是医疗服务机构的利益不一致或能力不足。本研究从多医疗服务组织的角度调查原因,区分付款人、保险公司、医疗服务提供者和创新者,详细说明预期增值、首选参与角色和所需能力,包括评级评估:研究结果以分类法开发方法为基础,该方法结合了文献综述和半结构化定性专家访谈,采用改良德尔菲法进行。对访谈进行了专题分析:结果:四个医疗服务组织小组共 21 位专家接受了访谈。能力分类法共包括 16 种能力,分为三个主题:"医疗市场"、"组织 "和 "技术与信息"。医疗服务提供者期望通过提高效率来加强其医疗流程经济学,从而实现增值,但也暴露出最大的能力差距,尤其是在 "互操作性 "和 "平台 "方面。创新者的 "技术和信息化 "能力与支付者的 "医疗市场 "能力相辅相成:我们提出了一种针对医疗服务机构的三阶段方法,用于建立数字医疗生态系统。支付方和保险公司应解决其 "技术和信息 "能力差距问题,利用技术推进手段或组建新实体,以减少对传统信息技术系统的依赖。创新者应明确其货币化模式,为其服务创造积极的认知度,并在可能的情况下直接进入市场。提供商必须解决互操作性问题,并可能需要激励措施来鼓励其参与。研究结果建议政府决策者优先考虑三项卫生政策措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to establish digital health ecosystems from the perspective of health service-organizations: A taxonomy developed based on expert interviews conducted as modified Delphi approach.

Objective: Digital health ecosystems may be the next revolution in improving citizens' well-being, health delivery, data management, and health system processes, but solutions have not yet been broadly established. Reasons could be that health service-organizations have misaligned interests or lack capabilities. This study investigates reasons from a multi-health-service-organization perspective, differentiating between payers, insurers, healthcare providers, and innovators, detailing the expected value-adds, preferred participation roles, and required capabilities including a rating assessment.

Methods: Findings are based on a taxonomy development methodology, which combines a literature review with semi-structured qualitative expert interviews, conducted using a modified Delphi approach. Interviews were thematically analysed.

Results: In total, 21 experts across the four health service-organization groups were interviewed. The capability taxonomy includes a total of 16 capabilities, categorized in three themes: 'Health market', 'organizational', and 'technology and informatic'. Providers expect a value-add from strengthening their health process economics through efficiency gains but reveal the largest capability gaps, especially in 'interoperability' and 'platform'. Innovators' 'technology and informatic' capabilities complement well with those of payers for the 'health market'.

Conclusions: We present a health service-organization-specific three-stage approach for establishing digital health ecosystems. Payers and insurers should address their 'technology and informatic' capability gaps, using technical enablers or forming new entities to reduce dependencies from legacy information technology systems. Innovators should clarify their monetization models and create positive awareness for their services, possibly entering the market directly. Providers must address interoperability issues and may require incentives to encourage their participation. Findings suggest governmental policymakers to prioritize three health policy initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信