利用住院远程医疗促进家庭参与:对患者、家属和护理团队提供者看法的混合方法研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241267374
Jennifer L Rosenthal, Jacob Williams, Keegan F Bowers, Sarah C Haynes, Lori Kennedy
{"title":"利用住院远程医疗促进家庭参与:对患者、家属和护理团队提供者看法的混合方法研究。","authors":"Jennifer L Rosenthal, Jacob Williams, Keegan F Bowers, Sarah C Haynes, Lori Kennedy","doi":"10.1177/20552076241267374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Inpatient Telehealth Program permits family to remotely communicate with the patient and care team through secure, live video. We aimed to assess the implementation of this program for family engagement from the perspectives of patients, families, and providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a convergent mixed methods design. The quantitative component was a cross-sectional analysis of surveys assessing patient, family, and provider experience. The qualitative component used thematic analysis of patient, family, and provider interviews plus survey free text responses. We performed memo-writing and coding. We developed hypotheses about relationships among categories and identified analytic themes. We used data transformation and narrative discussion to report the integrated findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys from 214 individuals (33 patients, 145 family, 36 providers) were evaluated. Mean (standard deviation) experience ratings (1-poor, 5-best) were 4.0 (1.5) for patients, 4.6 (0.8) for family, and 4.0 (1.4) for providers. We received 134 free text responses and conducted 21 interviews. Three themes emerged: (1) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient and family experience through strengthened relationships and increased support; (2) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient care through improved information sharing and engagement; (3) low awareness of the program limited adoption. Quantitative and qualitative data aligned in that participants perceived inpatient telehealth to be valuable; however, surveys revealed that patients and providers have relatively lower satisfaction with the program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inpatient telehealth for family engagement was perceived to improve family-centeredness of care. Future work is needed to overcome implementation challenges and to increase awareness of this resource among patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using inpatient telehealth for family engagement: A mixed methods study of perceptions from patients, families, and care team providers.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Rosenthal, Jacob Williams, Keegan F Bowers, Sarah C Haynes, Lori Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241267374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Inpatient Telehealth Program permits family to remotely communicate with the patient and care team through secure, live video. We aimed to assess the implementation of this program for family engagement from the perspectives of patients, families, and providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a convergent mixed methods design. The quantitative component was a cross-sectional analysis of surveys assessing patient, family, and provider experience. The qualitative component used thematic analysis of patient, family, and provider interviews plus survey free text responses. We performed memo-writing and coding. We developed hypotheses about relationships among categories and identified analytic themes. We used data transformation and narrative discussion to report the integrated findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys from 214 individuals (33 patients, 145 family, 36 providers) were evaluated. Mean (standard deviation) experience ratings (1-poor, 5-best) were 4.0 (1.5) for patients, 4.6 (0.8) for family, and 4.0 (1.4) for providers. We received 134 free text responses and conducted 21 interviews. Three themes emerged: (1) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient and family experience through strengthened relationships and increased support; (2) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient care through improved information sharing and engagement; (3) low awareness of the program limited adoption. Quantitative and qualitative data aligned in that participants perceived inpatient telehealth to be valuable; however, surveys revealed that patients and providers have relatively lower satisfaction with the program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inpatient telehealth for family engagement was perceived to improve family-centeredness of care. Future work is needed to overcome implementation challenges and to increase awareness of this resource among patients and families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241267374\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241267374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:住院患者远程医疗计划允许家属通过安全的实时视频与患者和护理团队进行远程交流。我们旨在从患者、家属和医疗服务提供者的角度评估该计划在家庭参与方面的实施情况:我们采用了融合混合方法设计。定量部分是对评估患者、家属和医疗服务提供者体验的调查进行横截面分析。定性部分是对患者、家属和医疗服务提供者的访谈以及调查的自由文本回复进行主题分析。我们进行了备忘录编写和编码。我们就不同类别之间的关系提出了假设,并确定了分析主题。我们使用数据转换和叙述性讨论来报告综合结果:对 214 名个人(33 名患者、145 名家属和 36 名医疗服务提供者)的调查问卷进行了评估。患者的平均(标准差)体验评分(1-差,5-最佳)为 4.0 (1.5),家属为 4.6 (0.8),医疗服务提供者为 4.0 (1.4)。我们收到了 134 份自由文本回复,并进行了 21 次访谈。我们发现了三个主题:(1)通过加强关系和增加支持,住院患者远程医疗改善了患者和家属的体验;(2)通过改善信息共享和参与,住院患者远程医疗加强了患者护理;(3)对该计划的低认知度限制了该计划的采用。定量和定性数据表明,参与者认为住院患者远程医疗很有价值;但调查显示,患者和医疗服务提供者对该项目满意度相对较低:结论:住院患者远程医疗促进家庭参与被认为能改善以家庭为中心的护理。今后的工作需要克服实施方面的挑战,并提高患者和家属对这一资源的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using inpatient telehealth for family engagement: A mixed methods study of perceptions from patients, families, and care team providers.

Background: The Inpatient Telehealth Program permits family to remotely communicate with the patient and care team through secure, live video. We aimed to assess the implementation of this program for family engagement from the perspectives of patients, families, and providers.

Methods: We used a convergent mixed methods design. The quantitative component was a cross-sectional analysis of surveys assessing patient, family, and provider experience. The qualitative component used thematic analysis of patient, family, and provider interviews plus survey free text responses. We performed memo-writing and coding. We developed hypotheses about relationships among categories and identified analytic themes. We used data transformation and narrative discussion to report the integrated findings.

Results: Surveys from 214 individuals (33 patients, 145 family, 36 providers) were evaluated. Mean (standard deviation) experience ratings (1-poor, 5-best) were 4.0 (1.5) for patients, 4.6 (0.8) for family, and 4.0 (1.4) for providers. We received 134 free text responses and conducted 21 interviews. Three themes emerged: (1) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient and family experience through strengthened relationships and increased support; (2) inpatient telehealth enhanced patient care through improved information sharing and engagement; (3) low awareness of the program limited adoption. Quantitative and qualitative data aligned in that participants perceived inpatient telehealth to be valuable; however, surveys revealed that patients and providers have relatively lower satisfaction with the program.

Conclusion: Inpatient telehealth for family engagement was perceived to improve family-centeredness of care. Future work is needed to overcome implementation challenges and to increase awareness of this resource among patients and families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信