{"title":"针对 [18F]flutemetamol 淀粉样蛋白 PET 图像的贝叶斯惩罚似然重建算法中惩罚函数的优化。","authors":"Shohei Fukuda, Kei Wagatsuma, Kenta Miwa, Yu Yakushiji, Yuto Kamitaka, Tensho Yamao, Noriaki Miyaji, Kenji Ishii","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01476-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Point-spread-function (PSF) correction is not recommended for amyloid PET images due to Gibbs artifacts. Q.Clear™, a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) reconstruction method without incorporating PSF correction reduces these artifacts but degrades image contrast by our previous findings. The present study aimed to recover lost contrast by optimizing reconstruction parameters in time-of-flight (TOF) BPL reconstruction of amyloid PET images without PSF correction. We selected candidate conditions based on a phantom study and then determined which were optimal in a clinical study. Phantom images were reconstructed under conditions of 1‒9 iterations, β 300-1000 and γ factors from 2 to 10 in TOF-BPL without PSF correction. We evaluated the %contrast and the coefficients of variation (CV, %). Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr) and Centiloid scales (CL) were calculated from PET images acquired from 71 participants after an [<sup>18</sup>F]flutemetamol injection. Both %contrast and CV were independent of iterations, whereas a trade-off was found between γ factors and β. We selected a γ factors of 5 without PSF correction (iterations, 1; β, 500) and of 10 without PSF correction (iterations, 1; β, 800) as candidates for clinical investigation. The SUVr and CL remained stable across various conditions, and CL scales effectively discriminated amyloid PET using measured values. The optimal reconstruction parameters of TOF-BPL for [<sup>18</sup>F]flutemetamol PET images were γ factor 10, iterations 1 and β 800, without PSF correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of penalization function in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for [<sup>18</sup>F]flutemetamol amyloid PET images.\",\"authors\":\"Shohei Fukuda, Kei Wagatsuma, Kenta Miwa, Yu Yakushiji, Yuto Kamitaka, Tensho Yamao, Noriaki Miyaji, Kenji Ishii\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-024-01476-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Point-spread-function (PSF) correction is not recommended for amyloid PET images due to Gibbs artifacts. Q.Clear™, a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) reconstruction method without incorporating PSF correction reduces these artifacts but degrades image contrast by our previous findings. The present study aimed to recover lost contrast by optimizing reconstruction parameters in time-of-flight (TOF) BPL reconstruction of amyloid PET images without PSF correction. We selected candidate conditions based on a phantom study and then determined which were optimal in a clinical study. Phantom images were reconstructed under conditions of 1‒9 iterations, β 300-1000 and γ factors from 2 to 10 in TOF-BPL without PSF correction. We evaluated the %contrast and the coefficients of variation (CV, %). Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr) and Centiloid scales (CL) were calculated from PET images acquired from 71 participants after an [<sup>18</sup>F]flutemetamol injection. Both %contrast and CV were independent of iterations, whereas a trade-off was found between γ factors and β. We selected a γ factors of 5 without PSF correction (iterations, 1; β, 500) and of 10 without PSF correction (iterations, 1; β, 800) as candidates for clinical investigation. The SUVr and CL remained stable across various conditions, and CL scales effectively discriminated amyloid PET using measured values. The optimal reconstruction parameters of TOF-BPL for [<sup>18</sup>F]flutemetamol PET images were γ factor 10, iterations 1 and β 800, without PSF correction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01476-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01476-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于淀粉样蛋白 PET 图像会产生吉布斯伪影,因此不建议对其进行点扩散函数(PSF)校正。Q.Clear™是一种贝叶斯惩罚化似然法(BPL)重建方法,不包含PSF校正,可以减少这些伪影,但会降低图像对比度。本研究旨在通过优化飞行时间(TOF)BPL 重建淀粉样蛋白 PET 图像时的重建参数,恢复失去的对比度,而不进行 PSF 校正。我们根据模型研究选择了候选条件,然后在临床研究中确定了最佳条件。在不进行 PSF 校正的 TOF-BPL 重建中,在 1-9 次迭代、β 300-1000 和 γ 因子 2-10 的条件下重建了模型图像。我们评估了对比度百分比和变异系数(CV,%)。我们从 71 名参与者注射[18F]氟替美托后获得的 PET 图像中计算了标准化摄取值比(SUVr)和Centiloid 标度(CL)。对比度%和CV都与迭代次数无关,而γ系数和β之间存在权衡。我们选择了不带PSF校正的5个γ系数(迭代次数,1;β,500)和不带PSF校正的10个γ系数(迭代次数,1;β,800)作为临床研究的候选系数。SUVr和CL在各种条件下都保持稳定,CL标度利用测量值有效地鉴别了淀粉样蛋白PET。TOF-BPL 对[18F]氟替美托咪醇 PET 图像的最佳重建参数为:γ 因子 10、迭代 1 和 β 800,无 PSF 校正。
Optimization of penalization function in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for [18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET images.
Point-spread-function (PSF) correction is not recommended for amyloid PET images due to Gibbs artifacts. Q.Clear™, a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) reconstruction method without incorporating PSF correction reduces these artifacts but degrades image contrast by our previous findings. The present study aimed to recover lost contrast by optimizing reconstruction parameters in time-of-flight (TOF) BPL reconstruction of amyloid PET images without PSF correction. We selected candidate conditions based on a phantom study and then determined which were optimal in a clinical study. Phantom images were reconstructed under conditions of 1‒9 iterations, β 300-1000 and γ factors from 2 to 10 in TOF-BPL without PSF correction. We evaluated the %contrast and the coefficients of variation (CV, %). Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr) and Centiloid scales (CL) were calculated from PET images acquired from 71 participants after an [18F]flutemetamol injection. Both %contrast and CV were independent of iterations, whereas a trade-off was found between γ factors and β. We selected a γ factors of 5 without PSF correction (iterations, 1; β, 500) and of 10 without PSF correction (iterations, 1; β, 800) as candidates for clinical investigation. The SUVr and CL remained stable across various conditions, and CL scales effectively discriminated amyloid PET using measured values. The optimal reconstruction parameters of TOF-BPL for [18F]flutemetamol PET images were γ factor 10, iterations 1 and β 800, without PSF correction.