功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后用生理盐水冲洗鼻腔与生理盐水加布地奈德冲洗鼻腔对鼻窦息肉病患者的疗效:随机对照试验

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Shashidhar S Suligavi, Varsha Sridhar, Sangappa S Doddamani
{"title":"功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后用生理盐水冲洗鼻腔与生理盐水加布地奈德冲洗鼻腔对鼻窦息肉病患者的疗效:随机对照试验","authors":"Shashidhar S Suligavi, Varsha Sridhar, Sangappa S Doddamani","doi":"10.1007/s12070-024-04666-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS) is a condition characterized by inflammation of the lining of nose and sinuses lasting for 12 weeks or more. CRS with nasal polyp nasal polyp(CRSwNP) is seen in 0.5-4% of the population and is present in about 20% of patients with CRS. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery aids in restoring the ventilation and drainage of paranasal sinuses. Postoperatively, various solutions are used to irrigate the sinus cavity for pharmaceutical and mechanical lavage. Hence, it is imperative to compare different solutions to choose the best to give a favorable outcome. A total of 24 postoperative CRSwNP patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A received routine post-FESS medication as per the institute guidelines. Group B received budesonide nasal irrigation in addition to regular care. Both groups were evaluated endoscopically at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the surgery. Pre and postoperative quality of life were compared. Endoscopic Lund-Kennedy scoring (objective measurement) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 score were used to compare the two groups. The mean preoperative Sino Nasal Outcomes Test 22 score(SNOT-22) was 46.58 ± 6.18 in group A and 50.5 ± 5.7 in group B. It was reduced to 15.00 ± 2.00 and 9.75 ± 1.95 postoperatively in both groups respectively at the end of 3 months. Postoperatively, the mean endoscopic score was 2.36 ± 0.80 in group A and 1.18 ± 0.40 in group B at the end of 3 months. In conclusion, saline plus budesonide nasal irrigation is a better option when compared to saline only irrigation in terms of efficacy and therapeutic effect in patients undergoing FESS for CRSwNP, hence, it should be advocated in regular clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49190,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11306458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of Post Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Nasal Irrigation with Normal Saline Versus Normal Saline with Budesonide in Patients with Sinonasal Polyposis: A Randomized Control Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shashidhar S Suligavi, Varsha Sridhar, Sangappa S Doddamani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12070-024-04666-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS) is a condition characterized by inflammation of the lining of nose and sinuses lasting for 12 weeks or more. CRS with nasal polyp nasal polyp(CRSwNP) is seen in 0.5-4% of the population and is present in about 20% of patients with CRS. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery aids in restoring the ventilation and drainage of paranasal sinuses. Postoperatively, various solutions are used to irrigate the sinus cavity for pharmaceutical and mechanical lavage. Hence, it is imperative to compare different solutions to choose the best to give a favorable outcome. A total of 24 postoperative CRSwNP patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A received routine post-FESS medication as per the institute guidelines. Group B received budesonide nasal irrigation in addition to regular care. Both groups were evaluated endoscopically at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the surgery. Pre and postoperative quality of life were compared. Endoscopic Lund-Kennedy scoring (objective measurement) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 score were used to compare the two groups. The mean preoperative Sino Nasal Outcomes Test 22 score(SNOT-22) was 46.58 ± 6.18 in group A and 50.5 ± 5.7 in group B. It was reduced to 15.00 ± 2.00 and 9.75 ± 1.95 postoperatively in both groups respectively at the end of 3 months. Postoperatively, the mean endoscopic score was 2.36 ± 0.80 in group A and 1.18 ± 0.40 in group B at the end of 3 months. In conclusion, saline plus budesonide nasal irrigation is a better option when compared to saline only irrigation in terms of efficacy and therapeutic effect in patients undergoing FESS for CRSwNP, hence, it should be advocated in regular clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11306458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-04666-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-04666-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是一种以鼻腔和鼻窦内壁炎症为特征的疾病,持续 12 周或更长时间。CRS伴有鼻息肉鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的患者占总人口的0.5%-4%,约20%的CRS患者伴有鼻息肉。功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术有助于恢复副鼻窦的通气和引流。术后会使用各种溶液对鼻窦腔进行药物灌洗和机械灌洗。因此,必须对不同的溶液进行比较,选择最佳的溶液,以获得良好的效果。总共 24 名术后 CRSwNP 患者被随机分为两组。A 组按照医院指南接受常规的 FESS 术后药物治疗。B 组除常规护理外,还接受布地奈德鼻腔冲洗。两组患者分别在术后 1、4 和 12 周接受内窥镜评估。比较了术前和术后的生活质量。两组患者采用内镜下 Lund-Kennedy 评分(客观测量)和中国鼻腔结果测试 22 评分进行比较。术前,A 组的平均鼻功能测试 22 分(SNOT-22)为 46.58 ± 6.18 分,B 组为 50.5 ± 5.7 分;术后 3 个月,两组的平均鼻功能测试 22 分(SNOT-22)分别降至 15.00 ± 2.00 分和 9.75 ± 1.95 分。术后 3 个月结束时,A 组的平均内镜评分为 2.36 ± 0.80,B 组为 1.18 ± 0.40。总之,对于因 CRSwNP 而接受 FESS 的患者而言,生理盐水加布地奈德鼻腔冲洗与仅使用生理盐水冲洗相比,在疗效和治疗效果方面都更胜一筹,因此应在常规临床实践中加以推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of Post Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Nasal Irrigation with Normal Saline Versus Normal Saline with Budesonide in Patients with Sinonasal Polyposis: A Randomized Control Trial.

Chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS) is a condition characterized by inflammation of the lining of nose and sinuses lasting for 12 weeks or more. CRS with nasal polyp nasal polyp(CRSwNP) is seen in 0.5-4% of the population and is present in about 20% of patients with CRS. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery aids in restoring the ventilation and drainage of paranasal sinuses. Postoperatively, various solutions are used to irrigate the sinus cavity for pharmaceutical and mechanical lavage. Hence, it is imperative to compare different solutions to choose the best to give a favorable outcome. A total of 24 postoperative CRSwNP patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A received routine post-FESS medication as per the institute guidelines. Group B received budesonide nasal irrigation in addition to regular care. Both groups were evaluated endoscopically at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the surgery. Pre and postoperative quality of life were compared. Endoscopic Lund-Kennedy scoring (objective measurement) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 score were used to compare the two groups. The mean preoperative Sino Nasal Outcomes Test 22 score(SNOT-22) was 46.58 ± 6.18 in group A and 50.5 ± 5.7 in group B. It was reduced to 15.00 ± 2.00 and 9.75 ± 1.95 postoperatively in both groups respectively at the end of 3 months. Postoperatively, the mean endoscopic score was 2.36 ± 0.80 in group A and 1.18 ± 0.40 in group B at the end of 3 months. In conclusion, saline plus budesonide nasal irrigation is a better option when compared to saline only irrigation in terms of efficacy and therapeutic effect in patients undergoing FESS for CRSwNP, hence, it should be advocated in regular clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery was founded as Indian Journal of Otolaryngology in 1949 as a scientific Journal published by the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and was later rechristened as IJOHNS to incorporate the changes and progress. IJOHNS, undoubtedly one of the oldest Journals in India, is the official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and is about to publish it is 67th Volume in 2015. The Journal published quarterly accepts articles in general Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and various subspecialities such as Otology, Rhinology, Laryngology and Phonosurgery, Neurotology, Head and Neck Surgery etc. The Journal acts as a window to showcase and project the clinical and research work done by Otolaryngologists community in India and around the world. It is a continued source of useful clinical information with peer review by eminent Otolaryngologists of repute in their respective fields. The Journal accepts articles pertaining to clinical reports, Clinical studies, Research articles in basic and applied Otolaryngology, short Communications, Clinical records reporting unusual presentations or lesions and new surgical techniques. The journal acts as a catalyst and mirrors the Indian Otolaryngologist’s active interests and pursuits. The Journal also invites articles from senior and experienced authors on interesting topics in Otolaryngology and allied sciences from all over the world. The print version is distributed free to about 4000 members of Association of Otolaryngologists of India and the e-Journal shortly going to make its appearance on the Springer Board can be accessed by all the members. Association of Otolaryngologists of India and M/s Springer India group have come together to co-publish IJOHNS from January 2007 and this bondage is going to provide an impetus to the Journal in terms of international presence and global exposure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信