椎体支架植入术治疗原发性骨质疏松症所致急性脊柱压缩性骨折的有效性和安全性:多中心前瞻性临床研究。

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-02-14 eCollection Date: 2024-07-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2023-0248
Ryuichi Takemasa, Hiroaki Konishi, Akihito Minamide, Motohiro Kawasaki, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Kenichi Watanabe, Kenzo Shirasawa, Ken Ishii, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Tomoaki Toyone, Munehito Yoshida
{"title":"椎体支架植入术治疗原发性骨质疏松症所致急性脊柱压缩性骨折的有效性和安全性:多中心前瞻性临床研究。","authors":"Ryuichi Takemasa, Hiroaki Konishi, Akihito Minamide, Motohiro Kawasaki, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Kenichi Watanabe, Kenzo Shirasawa, Ken Ishii, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Tomoaki Toyone, Munehito Yoshida","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Segmental spinal deformity results from vertebral compression fracture (VCF) and progressive collapse of the fractured vertebral body (VB). The VB stenting (VBS) system<sup>Ⓡ</sup> comprises a balloon-assisted, expandable, intrasomatic, metal stent that helps maintain the restored VB during balloon removal and cement injection, which minimizes cement leakage. We performed a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial of the VBS system in Japanese patients with acute VCF owing to primary osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Herein, 88 patients, 25 men and 63 women aged 77.4±8.3 years, with low back pain, numerical rating scale (NRS) score of ≥4, and mean VB compression percentage (VBCP) of <60% were enrolled. The primary endpoints were the VBCP restoration rate and reduction in low back pain 1 month and 7 days after VBS surgery, respectively. Secondary endpoints included changes in VBCP, NRS pain score, Beck index, kyphosis angle, and quality of life according to the short form 36 (v2) score. Safety was assessed as adverse events, device malfunctions, and new vertebral fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 70 patients completed the study. VBS surgery increased the restoration rates of anterior and midline VBCP by 31.7%±26.5% (lower 95% confidence intervals (CI): 26.8) and 31.8%±24.6% (lower 95% CI: 27.2), respectively, and the reduction in NRS pain score was -4.5±2.4 (upper 95% CI: -4.0). As these changes were greater than the predetermined primary endpoint values (20% for VBCP and -2 for NRS score), they were judged clinically significant; these changes were maintained throughout the 12-month follow-up (p<0.001). Likewise, significant improvement was observed in the Beck index, kyphosis angle, and quality of life score, which were maintained throughout the follow-up. There were three serious adverse events. New fractures occurred in 12 patients-all in the adjacent VB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VBS surgery effectively restored the collapsed VB, relieved low back pain, and was tolerable in patients with acute osteoporotic VB fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Safety of Vertebral Body Stenting for Acute Spinal Compression Fractures due to Primary Osteoporosis: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryuichi Takemasa, Hiroaki Konishi, Akihito Minamide, Motohiro Kawasaki, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Kenichi Watanabe, Kenzo Shirasawa, Ken Ishii, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Tomoaki Toyone, Munehito Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Segmental spinal deformity results from vertebral compression fracture (VCF) and progressive collapse of the fractured vertebral body (VB). The VB stenting (VBS) system<sup>Ⓡ</sup> comprises a balloon-assisted, expandable, intrasomatic, metal stent that helps maintain the restored VB during balloon removal and cement injection, which minimizes cement leakage. We performed a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial of the VBS system in Japanese patients with acute VCF owing to primary osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Herein, 88 patients, 25 men and 63 women aged 77.4±8.3 years, with low back pain, numerical rating scale (NRS) score of ≥4, and mean VB compression percentage (VBCP) of <60% were enrolled. The primary endpoints were the VBCP restoration rate and reduction in low back pain 1 month and 7 days after VBS surgery, respectively. Secondary endpoints included changes in VBCP, NRS pain score, Beck index, kyphosis angle, and quality of life according to the short form 36 (v2) score. Safety was assessed as adverse events, device malfunctions, and new vertebral fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 70 patients completed the study. VBS surgery increased the restoration rates of anterior and midline VBCP by 31.7%±26.5% (lower 95% confidence intervals (CI): 26.8) and 31.8%±24.6% (lower 95% CI: 27.2), respectively, and the reduction in NRS pain score was -4.5±2.4 (upper 95% CI: -4.0). As these changes were greater than the predetermined primary endpoint values (20% for VBCP and -2 for NRS score), they were judged clinically significant; these changes were maintained throughout the 12-month follow-up (p<0.001). Likewise, significant improvement was observed in the Beck index, kyphosis angle, and quality of life score, which were maintained throughout the follow-up. There were three serious adverse events. New fractures occurred in 12 patients-all in the adjacent VB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VBS surgery effectively restored the collapsed VB, relieved low back pain, and was tolerable in patients with acute osteoporotic VB fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:脊椎压缩性骨折(VCF)和骨折椎体(VB)的逐渐塌陷会导致脊柱节段性畸形。椎体支架植入(VBS)系统Ⓡ由球囊辅助、可扩张、椎体内金属支架组成,有助于在球囊取出和骨水泥注入过程中保持修复后的椎体,从而最大限度地减少骨水泥渗漏。我们在日本原发性骨质疏松症急性 VCF 患者中开展了一项关于 VBS 系统的前瞻性多中心临床试验。 方法:88 例患者中,男性 25 例,女性 63 例,年龄(77.4±8.3)岁,腰背痛,数字评分量表(NRS)评分≥4 分,平均 VB 压缩百分比(VBCP)为(77.4±8.3)分:共有 70 名患者完成了研究。VBS 手术使前线和中线 VBCP 的恢复率分别提高了 31.7%±26.5%(95% 置信区间下限:26.8)和 31.8%±24.6%(95% 置信区间下限:27.2),NRS 疼痛评分降低了 -4.5±2.4(95% 置信区间上限:-4.0)。由于这些变化超过了预定的主要终点值(VBCP 下降 20%,NRS 评分下降 -2),因此被判定为具有临床意义;这些变化在 12 个月的随访中一直保持不变(结论:VBS 手术有效地恢复了塌陷的血管:VBS 手术有效地恢复了塌陷的 VB,缓解了腰背疼痛,而且急性骨质疏松性 VB 骨折患者可以耐受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and Safety of Vertebral Body Stenting for Acute Spinal Compression Fractures due to Primary Osteoporosis: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study.

Introduction: Segmental spinal deformity results from vertebral compression fracture (VCF) and progressive collapse of the fractured vertebral body (VB). The VB stenting (VBS) system comprises a balloon-assisted, expandable, intrasomatic, metal stent that helps maintain the restored VB during balloon removal and cement injection, which minimizes cement leakage. We performed a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial of the VBS system in Japanese patients with acute VCF owing to primary osteoporosis.

Methods: Herein, 88 patients, 25 men and 63 women aged 77.4±8.3 years, with low back pain, numerical rating scale (NRS) score of ≥4, and mean VB compression percentage (VBCP) of <60% were enrolled. The primary endpoints were the VBCP restoration rate and reduction in low back pain 1 month and 7 days after VBS surgery, respectively. Secondary endpoints included changes in VBCP, NRS pain score, Beck index, kyphosis angle, and quality of life according to the short form 36 (v2) score. Safety was assessed as adverse events, device malfunctions, and new vertebral fractures.

Results: Overall, 70 patients completed the study. VBS surgery increased the restoration rates of anterior and midline VBCP by 31.7%±26.5% (lower 95% confidence intervals (CI): 26.8) and 31.8%±24.6% (lower 95% CI: 27.2), respectively, and the reduction in NRS pain score was -4.5±2.4 (upper 95% CI: -4.0). As these changes were greater than the predetermined primary endpoint values (20% for VBCP and -2 for NRS score), they were judged clinically significant; these changes were maintained throughout the 12-month follow-up (p<0.001). Likewise, significant improvement was observed in the Beck index, kyphosis angle, and quality of life score, which were maintained throughout the follow-up. There were three serious adverse events. New fractures occurred in 12 patients-all in the adjacent VB.

Conclusions: VBS surgery effectively restored the collapsed VB, relieved low back pain, and was tolerable in patients with acute osteoporotic VB fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信