在预测第二前十字韧带损伤方面,跳跃距离与身高之比优于肢体对称指数。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Mohammad Rahimi Khoygani, Hamed Esmaeili
{"title":"在预测第二前十字韧带损伤方面,跳跃距离与身高之比优于肢体对称指数。","authors":"Mohammad Rahimi Khoygani, Hamed Esmaeili","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ability of current return-to-sport (RTS) tests to predict second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (ACLI) in athletes with a history of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is unclear. This study aimed to prospectively assess the risk of a second ACLI by identifying the most significant deviation in hop test results in professional athletes after ACLR compared to healthy peers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 professional athletes with a history of ACLR and 30 healthy professional athletes participated in this study. Participants performed 10 functional hop tests, and the subsequent limb symmetry index (LSI) was compared between the groups. After a 3-year follow-up, the re-injury rate was assessed among the ACLR group. Fourteen ACLR athletes who sustained a second ACLI were included and matched with 14 controls from the healthy group. The LSI and the hop distance to body height percentage (D/H) were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analyses confirmed a significant decrease in LSI in the ACLR group compared to the healthy group in the triple hop for distance (p = .023). In re-injured ACLR athletes, seven different hop tests showed a significant decrease in the D/H index compared to the healthy controls. Meanwhile, for LSI, only the triple cross-over hop for distance (p = .045) showed a significant increase in the healthy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Before clearing athletes for RTS, assessing functional hop test results using the hop distance to body height ratio, aligned with normative data from healthy controls, could further enhance the prediction of reduced graft rupture risk.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hop distance to body height ratio outperforms limb symmetry index in predicting second anterior cruciate ligament injury.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Rahimi Khoygani, Hamed Esmaeili\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ability of current return-to-sport (RTS) tests to predict second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (ACLI) in athletes with a history of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is unclear. This study aimed to prospectively assess the risk of a second ACLI by identifying the most significant deviation in hop test results in professional athletes after ACLR compared to healthy peers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 professional athletes with a history of ACLR and 30 healthy professional athletes participated in this study. Participants performed 10 functional hop tests, and the subsequent limb symmetry index (LSI) was compared between the groups. After a 3-year follow-up, the re-injury rate was assessed among the ACLR group. Fourteen ACLR athletes who sustained a second ACLI were included and matched with 14 controls from the healthy group. The LSI and the hop distance to body height percentage (D/H) were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analyses confirmed a significant decrease in LSI in the ACLR group compared to the healthy group in the triple hop for distance (p = .023). In re-injured ACLR athletes, seven different hop tests showed a significant decrease in the D/H index compared to the healthy controls. Meanwhile, for LSI, only the triple cross-over hop for distance (p = .045) showed a significant increase in the healthy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Before clearing athletes for RTS, assessing functional hop test results using the hop distance to body height ratio, aligned with normative data from healthy controls, could further enhance the prediction of reduced graft rupture risk.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12405\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前的恢复运动(RTS)测试能否预测有前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)史的运动员的第二次前交叉韧带损伤(ACLI)尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过确定前交叉韧带重建后专业运动员的跳跃测试结果与健康运动员相比最显著的偏差,从而前瞻性地评估发生第二次前交叉韧带损伤的风险:共有 30 名有前交叉韧带损伤史的专业运动员和 30 名健康的专业运动员参与了这项研究。参与者进行了 10 次功能性跳跃测试,并比较了两组运动员随后的肢体对称性指数(LSI)。经过 3 年的随访,评估了前交叉韧带损伤组的再次损伤率。14名前交叉韧带损伤运动员再次发生了前交叉韧带损伤,他们与健康组的14名对照组运动员进行了配对。比较了两组之间的 LSI 和跳跃距离与身高的百分比(D/H):统计分析证实,与健康组相比,前交叉韧带损伤组在三跳距离上的 LSI 显著下降(p = .023)。在前交叉韧带再损伤运动员中,与健康对照组相比,七种不同的跳跃测试显示 D/H 指数显著下降。同时,在LSI方面,健康组中只有距离三重交叉跳跃(p = .045)显示出明显的增加:结论:在批准运动员进行 RTS 之前,根据健康对照组的标准数据,使用跳跃距离与身高比来评估功能性跳跃测试结果,可进一步提高降低移植物破裂风险的预测能力:证据等级:一级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hop distance to body height ratio outperforms limb symmetry index in predicting second anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Purpose: The ability of current return-to-sport (RTS) tests to predict second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (ACLI) in athletes with a history of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is unclear. This study aimed to prospectively assess the risk of a second ACLI by identifying the most significant deviation in hop test results in professional athletes after ACLR compared to healthy peers.

Methods: A total of 30 professional athletes with a history of ACLR and 30 healthy professional athletes participated in this study. Participants performed 10 functional hop tests, and the subsequent limb symmetry index (LSI) was compared between the groups. After a 3-year follow-up, the re-injury rate was assessed among the ACLR group. Fourteen ACLR athletes who sustained a second ACLI were included and matched with 14 controls from the healthy group. The LSI and the hop distance to body height percentage (D/H) were compared between the groups.

Results: Statistical analyses confirmed a significant decrease in LSI in the ACLR group compared to the healthy group in the triple hop for distance (p = .023). In re-injured ACLR athletes, seven different hop tests showed a significant decrease in the D/H index compared to the healthy controls. Meanwhile, for LSI, only the triple cross-over hop for distance (p = .045) showed a significant increase in the healthy group.

Conclusion: Before clearing athletes for RTS, assessing functional hop test results using the hop distance to body height ratio, aligned with normative data from healthy controls, could further enhance the prediction of reduced graft rupture risk.

Level of evidence: Level I.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信