一项评估痔疮保守治疗的国际观察性研究:CHORALIS(急性痔疮评估国际研究)的结果。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Philippe Godeberge, Zoltan Csiki, Mykhailo Zakharash, Elly Nyaim Opot, Yuri A Shelygin, Trung Tin Nguyen, Ashraf Amir, Ibrahima Konaté, Moses Momoh, Joanna Chirol, Vanessa Blanc-Guillemaud, Ren Donglin
{"title":"一项评估痔疮保守治疗的国际观察性研究:CHORALIS(急性痔疮评估国际研究)的结果。","authors":"Philippe Godeberge, Zoltan Csiki, Mykhailo Zakharash, Elly Nyaim Opot, Yuri A Shelygin, Trung Tin Nguyen, Ashraf Amir, Ibrahima Konaté, Moses Momoh, Joanna Chirol, Vanessa Blanc-Guillemaud, Ren Donglin","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Real-world evidence on the management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is limited. This international study collected clinical practice data on the effectiveness of conservative treatments for acute HD on symptoms and quality of life (QoL), providing perspectives of treatment modalities from different continents. <b>Patients & methods:</b> The 4-week observational prospective CHORALIS study involved adult outpatients consulting for spontaneous complaints of hemorrhoids (graded using Goligher classification) and prescribed conservative treatments according to usual clinical practice. Assessments were: anal pain/discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS]), other signs/symptoms (patient questionnaire), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire and disease-specific QoL (HEMO-FISS-QoL questionnaire). <b>Results:</b> Of 3592 participants, 3505 were analyzed (58.4% male; age 40.5 ± 13.7 years; history of HD in 48.4%; 72.1% Goligher grade I and II). Pain and discomfort were the most common symptoms. Most treatments were venoactive drugs (VADs; 90.9%), particularly micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; 73.7%) and diosmin (14.6%). All VAD-based therapies improved signs/symptoms (number/intensity/frequency of pain, discomfort, bleeding, swelling, itching and soiling) and QoL. MPFF was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients with no symptoms (48.8 vs diosmin 34.4%, p < 0.001), pain disappearance (69.7 vs diosmin 52.8%, p < 0.001), treatment impact at 1 week rated on PGI-C as 'very much better' (30.5 vs diosmin 17.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter times to improvement (mean ± SD 3.9 ± 1.5 days vs diosmin 4.2 ± 1.7 days). <b>Conclusion:</b> In this prospective real-world study of patients with acute HD, conservative therapies consisting mainly of VADs, including MPFF, improved the clinical signs and symptoms of disease, as well as QoL. This study evidence supports clinical advantages associated with VADs, mostly MPFF, for effectively managing acute HD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e240070"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An international observational study assessing conservative management in hemorrhoidal disease: results of CHORALIS (aCute HemORrhoidal disease evALuation International Study).\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Godeberge, Zoltan Csiki, Mykhailo Zakharash, Elly Nyaim Opot, Yuri A Shelygin, Trung Tin Nguyen, Ashraf Amir, Ibrahima Konaté, Moses Momoh, Joanna Chirol, Vanessa Blanc-Guillemaud, Ren Donglin\",\"doi\":\"10.57264/cer-2024-0070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Real-world evidence on the management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is limited. This international study collected clinical practice data on the effectiveness of conservative treatments for acute HD on symptoms and quality of life (QoL), providing perspectives of treatment modalities from different continents. <b>Patients & methods:</b> The 4-week observational prospective CHORALIS study involved adult outpatients consulting for spontaneous complaints of hemorrhoids (graded using Goligher classification) and prescribed conservative treatments according to usual clinical practice. Assessments were: anal pain/discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS]), other signs/symptoms (patient questionnaire), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire and disease-specific QoL (HEMO-FISS-QoL questionnaire). <b>Results:</b> Of 3592 participants, 3505 were analyzed (58.4% male; age 40.5 ± 13.7 years; history of HD in 48.4%; 72.1% Goligher grade I and II). Pain and discomfort were the most common symptoms. Most treatments were venoactive drugs (VADs; 90.9%), particularly micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; 73.7%) and diosmin (14.6%). All VAD-based therapies improved signs/symptoms (number/intensity/frequency of pain, discomfort, bleeding, swelling, itching and soiling) and QoL. MPFF was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients with no symptoms (48.8 vs diosmin 34.4%, p < 0.001), pain disappearance (69.7 vs diosmin 52.8%, p < 0.001), treatment impact at 1 week rated on PGI-C as 'very much better' (30.5 vs diosmin 17.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter times to improvement (mean ± SD 3.9 ± 1.5 days vs diosmin 4.2 ± 1.7 days). <b>Conclusion:</b> In this prospective real-world study of patients with acute HD, conservative therapies consisting mainly of VADs, including MPFF, improved the clinical signs and symptoms of disease, as well as QoL. This study evidence supports clinical advantages associated with VADs, mostly MPFF, for effectively managing acute HD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e240070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426285/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:现实世界中有关痔疮疾病(HD)治疗的证据非常有限。这项国际研究收集了有关急性痔疮保守治疗对症状和生活质量(QoL)影响的临床实践数据,提供了来自不同大洲的治疗方法观点。患者和方法:这项为期 4 周的前瞻性 CHORALIS 观察性研究涉及因痔疮自发症状而就诊的成人门诊患者(根据 Goligher 分类法进行分级),并根据通常的临床实践开具了保守治疗处方。评估内容包括:肛门疼痛/不适(视觉模拟量表[VAS])、其他体征/症状(患者问卷)、患者总体变化印象(PGI-C)问卷和疾病特异性 QoL(HEMO-FISS-QoL 问卷)。结果:对 3592 名参与者中的 3505 人进行了分析(58.4% 为男性;年龄为 40.5 ± 13.7 岁;48.4% 有 HD 病史;72.1% 为 Goligher I 级和 II 级)。疼痛和不适是最常见的症状。大多数治疗方法是静脉活性药物(VADs;90.9%),尤其是微粉化纯化黄酮类成分(MPFF;73.7%)和地奥司明(14.6%)。所有基于 VAD 的疗法都能改善体征/症状(疼痛、不适、出血、肿胀、瘙痒和弄脏的次数/强度/频率)和 QoL。MPFF 无症状患者的比例明显更高(48.8% vs diosmin 34.4%,P 结论:MPFF 是一种有效的治疗方法:在这项针对急性 HD 患者的前瞻性真实世界研究中,包括 MPFF 在内的主要由 VADs 组成的保守疗法改善了疾病的临床症状和体征以及 QoL。这项研究的证据支持 VAD(主要是 MPFF)在有效治疗急性 HD 方面的临床优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An international observational study assessing conservative management in hemorrhoidal disease: results of CHORALIS (aCute HemORrhoidal disease evALuation International Study).

Aim: Real-world evidence on the management of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is limited. This international study collected clinical practice data on the effectiveness of conservative treatments for acute HD on symptoms and quality of life (QoL), providing perspectives of treatment modalities from different continents. Patients & methods: The 4-week observational prospective CHORALIS study involved adult outpatients consulting for spontaneous complaints of hemorrhoids (graded using Goligher classification) and prescribed conservative treatments according to usual clinical practice. Assessments were: anal pain/discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS]), other signs/symptoms (patient questionnaire), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire and disease-specific QoL (HEMO-FISS-QoL questionnaire). Results: Of 3592 participants, 3505 were analyzed (58.4% male; age 40.5 ± 13.7 years; history of HD in 48.4%; 72.1% Goligher grade I and II). Pain and discomfort were the most common symptoms. Most treatments were venoactive drugs (VADs; 90.9%), particularly micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; 73.7%) and diosmin (14.6%). All VAD-based therapies improved signs/symptoms (number/intensity/frequency of pain, discomfort, bleeding, swelling, itching and soiling) and QoL. MPFF was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients with no symptoms (48.8 vs diosmin 34.4%, p < 0.001), pain disappearance (69.7 vs diosmin 52.8%, p < 0.001), treatment impact at 1 week rated on PGI-C as 'very much better' (30.5 vs diosmin 17.9%, p < 0.001) and shorter times to improvement (mean ± SD 3.9 ± 1.5 days vs diosmin 4.2 ± 1.7 days). Conclusion: In this prospective real-world study of patients with acute HD, conservative therapies consisting mainly of VADs, including MPFF, improved the clinical signs and symptoms of disease, as well as QoL. This study evidence supports clinical advantages associated with VADs, mostly MPFF, for effectively managing acute HD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信