克利西兰相关不良事件:基于 FAERS 数据库的真实世界比例失调分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2389989
Xuyang Cai, Shaopeng Peng, Shangzhen Mu, Song Lei, Juan Li, Xiaoxue Tang, Feng Qiu
{"title":"克利西兰相关不良事件:基于 FAERS 数据库的真实世界比例失调分析。","authors":"Xuyang Cai, Shaopeng Peng, Shangzhen Mu, Song Lei, Juan Li, Xiaoxue Tang, Feng Qiu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2389989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized clinical trials have reported some safety profiles in inclisiran, but adverse events in real-world remain insufficient. We aim to evaluate the safety of inclisiran in real-world by collecting the data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was performed by utilizing both Frequency method and Bayesian method to mine adverse event signals of inclisiran. A positive signal was deemed significant when adverse event met the criteria of the aforementioned methods simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We gathered a total of 2309 adverse event reports. Among these cases, adverse events were more common in females and ≥ 65 years age group. After data analysis, 51 positive signals from 11 system organ classes were identified, involving \"Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders,\" \"General disorders and administration site conditions,\" \"Gastrointestinal disorders,\" etc. At the preferred term level, the top three frequently reported adverse events were arthralgia, injection site pain and myalgia. We also found some uncommon but significantly strong adverse event signals (bladder discomfort and sinus pain) which should be taken prudently.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we analyzed the real-world adverse events of inclisiran more comprehensively and reported some new adverse events, hoping that can offer more safety information for clinical medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1067-1072"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events associated with inclisiran: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.\",\"authors\":\"Xuyang Cai, Shaopeng Peng, Shangzhen Mu, Song Lei, Juan Li, Xiaoxue Tang, Feng Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2389989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized clinical trials have reported some safety profiles in inclisiran, but adverse events in real-world remain insufficient. We aim to evaluate the safety of inclisiran in real-world by collecting the data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was performed by utilizing both Frequency method and Bayesian method to mine adverse event signals of inclisiran. A positive signal was deemed significant when adverse event met the criteria of the aforementioned methods simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We gathered a total of 2309 adverse event reports. Among these cases, adverse events were more common in females and ≥ 65 years age group. After data analysis, 51 positive signals from 11 system organ classes were identified, involving \\\"Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders,\\\" \\\"General disorders and administration site conditions,\\\" \\\"Gastrointestinal disorders,\\\" etc. At the preferred term level, the top three frequently reported adverse events were arthralgia, injection site pain and myalgia. We also found some uncommon but significantly strong adverse event signals (bladder discomfort and sinus pain) which should be taken prudently.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we analyzed the real-world adverse events of inclisiran more comprehensively and reported some new adverse events, hoping that can offer more safety information for clinical medication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1067-1072\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2389989\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2389989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随机临床试验已报告了一些关于普利西兰的安全性,但真实世界中的不良事件仍然不足。我们旨在通过收集 FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库中的数据,评估 inclisiran 在真实世界中的安全性:方法:利用频率法和贝叶斯法进行比例失调分析,以挖掘 inclisiran 的不良事件信号。当不良事件同时符合上述方法的标准时,阳性信号被认为具有重要意义:我们共收集了 2309 份不良事件报告。结果:我们共收集到 2309 份不良事件报告,其中女性和年龄≥ 65 岁的人群更易发生不良事件。经过数据分析,确定了 11 个系统器官类别中的 51 个阳性信号,涉及 "肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病"、"一般疾病和用药部位状况"、"胃肠道疾病 "等。在首选术语层面,最常报告的三大不良事件是关节痛、注射部位疼痛和肌痛。我们还发现了一些不常见但明显强烈的不良事件信号(膀胱不适和鼻窦疼痛),应谨慎对待:本研究更全面地分析了克利西兰在真实世界中的不良事件,并报告了一些新的不良事件,希望能为临床用药提供更多的安全性信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse events associated with inclisiran: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.

Background: Randomized clinical trials have reported some safety profiles in inclisiran, but adverse events in real-world remain insufficient. We aim to evaluate the safety of inclisiran in real-world by collecting the data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Methods: Disproportionality analysis was performed by utilizing both Frequency method and Bayesian method to mine adverse event signals of inclisiran. A positive signal was deemed significant when adverse event met the criteria of the aforementioned methods simultaneously.

Results: We gathered a total of 2309 adverse event reports. Among these cases, adverse events were more common in females and ≥ 65 years age group. After data analysis, 51 positive signals from 11 system organ classes were identified, involving "Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders," "General disorders and administration site conditions," "Gastrointestinal disorders," etc. At the preferred term level, the top three frequently reported adverse events were arthralgia, injection site pain and myalgia. We also found some uncommon but significantly strong adverse event signals (bladder discomfort and sinus pain) which should be taken prudently.

Conclusions: In this study, we analyzed the real-world adverse events of inclisiran more comprehensively and reported some new adverse events, hoping that can offer more safety information for clinical medication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信