克罗恩病患者接受肠管胶囊内镜检查时内镜活动的变化和病变分类--与回肠结肠镜检查、粪便热蛋白和 C 反应蛋白的前瞻性盲法比较。

Jacob Broder Brodersen, Jens Kjeldsen, Mie Agerbæk Juel, Torben Knudsen, Søren Rafael Rafaelsen, Michael Dam Jensen
{"title":"克罗恩病患者接受肠管胶囊内镜检查时内镜活动的变化和病变分类--与回肠结肠镜检查、粪便热蛋白和 C 反应蛋白的前瞻性盲法比较。","authors":"Jacob Broder Brodersen, Jens Kjeldsen, Mie Agerbæk Juel, Torben Knudsen, Søren Rafael Rafaelsen, Michael Dam Jensen","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Panenteric capsule endoscopy (PCE) is a minimally invasive modality that may replace ileocolonoscopy (IC) in selected patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of repeated assessment with PCE in patients receiving medical treatment for ileocolonic CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, blinded, multicentre study included patients with endoscopically active CD. Patients were scheduled for IC, PCE, faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein before and 12 weeks after treatment with corticosteroids or biological therapy. The endoscopic disease activity was assessed with the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>31 patients entered the study, and PCE visualized 148 (95.5%) and 128 (82.6%) ileocolonic bowel segments before and after medical treatment, respectively. The median SES-CD decreased from 14 (IQR 8-17) to 5 (IQR 0-14) (P < 0.001) and 14 (IQR 10-17) to 6 (IQR 3-12) (P < 0.001) with IC and PCE, respectively. The repeated measurement correlation between PCE and IC was very strong (r = 0.77, P < 0.001), strong compared to faecal calprotectin (r = 0.42, P = 0.003) and moderate compared to C-reactive protein (r = 0.36, P = 0.005). The mean score for ulcer size, ulcerated surface and affected surface was equal to that of IC before and after treatment. PCE had a sensitivity and specificity of 80.6% (CI 62.5-92.5) and 93.8% (CI 79.2-99.2) for ulcer healing compared to IC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCE is responsive in patients treated for CD and may serve as a minimally invasive alternative to IC in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in endoscopic activity and classification of lesions with panenteric capsule endoscopy in patients treated for Crohn's disease - a prospective blinded comparison with ileocolonoscopy, faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Broder Brodersen, Jens Kjeldsen, Mie Agerbæk Juel, Torben Knudsen, Søren Rafael Rafaelsen, Michael Dam Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Panenteric capsule endoscopy (PCE) is a minimally invasive modality that may replace ileocolonoscopy (IC) in selected patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of repeated assessment with PCE in patients receiving medical treatment for ileocolonic CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, blinded, multicentre study included patients with endoscopically active CD. Patients were scheduled for IC, PCE, faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein before and 12 weeks after treatment with corticosteroids or biological therapy. The endoscopic disease activity was assessed with the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>31 patients entered the study, and PCE visualized 148 (95.5%) and 128 (82.6%) ileocolonic bowel segments before and after medical treatment, respectively. The median SES-CD decreased from 14 (IQR 8-17) to 5 (IQR 0-14) (P < 0.001) and 14 (IQR 10-17) to 6 (IQR 3-12) (P < 0.001) with IC and PCE, respectively. The repeated measurement correlation between PCE and IC was very strong (r = 0.77, P < 0.001), strong compared to faecal calprotectin (r = 0.42, P = 0.003) and moderate compared to C-reactive protein (r = 0.36, P = 0.005). The mean score for ulcer size, ulcerated surface and affected surface was equal to that of IC before and after treatment. PCE had a sensitivity and specificity of 80.6% (CI 62.5-92.5) and 93.8% (CI 79.2-99.2) for ulcer healing compared to IC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCE is responsive in patients treated for CD and may serve as a minimally invasive alternative to IC in selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:肠系膜胶囊内镜(PCE)是一种微创方式,可替代回结肠镜检查(IC)用于部分克罗恩病(CD)患者。本研究旨在评估接受药物治疗的回结肠 CD 患者使用 PCE 进行重复评估的动态效果:这项前瞻性、盲法、多中心研究纳入了内镜下活动性 CD 患者。患者在接受皮质类固醇激素或生物疗法治疗前和治疗后12周接受IC、PCE、粪便热保护蛋白和C反应蛋白检查。用克罗恩病简易内镜评分法(SES-CD)评估内镜下疾病活动度:31名患者参加了研究,PCE在药物治疗前后分别观察到148个(95.5%)和128个(82.6%)回结肠肠段。IC 和 PCE 的中位 SES-CD 分别从 14(IQR 8-17)降至 5(IQR 0-14)(P < 0.001)和 14(IQR 10-17)降至 6(IQR 3-12)(P < 0.001)。PCE 和 IC 之间的重复测量相关性非常强(r = 0.77,P < 0.001),与粪便钙蛋白相比相关性强(r = 0.42,P = 0.003),与 C 反应蛋白相比相关性中等(r = 0.36,P = 0.005)。治疗前后,溃疡大小、溃疡面和患面的平均得分与 IC 相同。与 IC 相比,PCE 对溃疡愈合的敏感性和特异性分别为 80.6% (CI 62.5-92.5) 和 93.8% (CI 79.2-99.2):结论:PCE对接受CD治疗的患者反应灵敏,在选定的患者中可作为IC的微创替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in endoscopic activity and classification of lesions with panenteric capsule endoscopy in patients treated for Crohn's disease - a prospective blinded comparison with ileocolonoscopy, faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein.

Background and aims: Panenteric capsule endoscopy (PCE) is a minimally invasive modality that may replace ileocolonoscopy (IC) in selected patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of repeated assessment with PCE in patients receiving medical treatment for ileocolonic CD.

Methods: This prospective, blinded, multicentre study included patients with endoscopically active CD. Patients were scheduled for IC, PCE, faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein before and 12 weeks after treatment with corticosteroids or biological therapy. The endoscopic disease activity was assessed with the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD).

Results: 31 patients entered the study, and PCE visualized 148 (95.5%) and 128 (82.6%) ileocolonic bowel segments before and after medical treatment, respectively. The median SES-CD decreased from 14 (IQR 8-17) to 5 (IQR 0-14) (P < 0.001) and 14 (IQR 10-17) to 6 (IQR 3-12) (P < 0.001) with IC and PCE, respectively. The repeated measurement correlation between PCE and IC was very strong (r = 0.77, P < 0.001), strong compared to faecal calprotectin (r = 0.42, P = 0.003) and moderate compared to C-reactive protein (r = 0.36, P = 0.005). The mean score for ulcer size, ulcerated surface and affected surface was equal to that of IC before and after treatment. PCE had a sensitivity and specificity of 80.6% (CI 62.5-92.5) and 93.8% (CI 79.2-99.2) for ulcer healing compared to IC.

Conclusion: PCE is responsive in patients treated for CD and may serve as a minimally invasive alternative to IC in selected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信