John H. McDermott, Videha Sharma, Glenda M. Beaman, Jessica Keen, William G. Newman, Paul Wilson, Katherine Payne, Stuart Wright
{"title":"了解全科医生和药剂师对基层医疗机构药物基因检测的偏好:离散选择实验。","authors":"John H. McDermott, Videha Sharma, Glenda M. Beaman, Jessica Keen, William G. Newman, Paul Wilson, Katherine Payne, Stuart Wright","doi":"10.1038/s41397-024-00344-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pharmacogenetic testing in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has historically been reactive in nature, undertaken in the context of single gene-drug relationships in specialist settings. Using a discrete choice experiment we aimed to identify healthcare professional preferences for development of a pharmacogenetic testing service in primary care in the NHS. Respondents, representing two professions groups (general practitioners or pharmacists), completed one of two survey versions, asking them to select their preferred pharmacogenetic testing service in the context of a presentation of low mood or joint pain. Responses from 235 individuals were included. All respondents preferred pharmacogenetic testing over no testing, though preference heterogeneity was identified. Both professional groups, but especially GPs, were highly sensitive to service design, with uptake varying depending on the service offered. This study demonstrates uptake of a pharmacogenetic testing service is impacted by service design and highlights key areas which should be prioritised within future initiatives.","PeriodicalId":54624,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenomics Journal","volume":"24 5","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding general practitioner and pharmacist preferences for pharmacogenetic testing in primary care: a discrete choice experiment\",\"authors\":\"John H. McDermott, Videha Sharma, Glenda M. Beaman, Jessica Keen, William G. Newman, Paul Wilson, Katherine Payne, Stuart Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41397-024-00344-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pharmacogenetic testing in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has historically been reactive in nature, undertaken in the context of single gene-drug relationships in specialist settings. Using a discrete choice experiment we aimed to identify healthcare professional preferences for development of a pharmacogenetic testing service in primary care in the NHS. Respondents, representing two professions groups (general practitioners or pharmacists), completed one of two survey versions, asking them to select their preferred pharmacogenetic testing service in the context of a presentation of low mood or joint pain. Responses from 235 individuals were included. All respondents preferred pharmacogenetic testing over no testing, though preference heterogeneity was identified. Both professional groups, but especially GPs, were highly sensitive to service design, with uptake varying depending on the service offered. This study demonstrates uptake of a pharmacogenetic testing service is impacted by service design and highlights key areas which should be prioritised within future initiatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacogenomics Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315669/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacogenomics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41397-024-00344-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenomics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41397-024-00344-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding general practitioner and pharmacist preferences for pharmacogenetic testing in primary care: a discrete choice experiment
Pharmacogenetic testing in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has historically been reactive in nature, undertaken in the context of single gene-drug relationships in specialist settings. Using a discrete choice experiment we aimed to identify healthcare professional preferences for development of a pharmacogenetic testing service in primary care in the NHS. Respondents, representing two professions groups (general practitioners or pharmacists), completed one of two survey versions, asking them to select their preferred pharmacogenetic testing service in the context of a presentation of low mood or joint pain. Responses from 235 individuals were included. All respondents preferred pharmacogenetic testing over no testing, though preference heterogeneity was identified. Both professional groups, but especially GPs, were highly sensitive to service design, with uptake varying depending on the service offered. This study demonstrates uptake of a pharmacogenetic testing service is impacted by service design and highlights key areas which should be prioritised within future initiatives.
期刊介绍:
The Pharmacogenomics Journal is a print and electronic journal, which is dedicated to the rapid publication of original research on pharmacogenomics and its clinical applications.
Key areas of coverage include:
Personalized medicine
Effects of genetic variability on drug toxicity and efficacy
Identification and functional characterization of polymorphisms relevant to drug action
Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variations and drug efficacy
Integration of new developments in the genome project and proteomics into clinical medicine, pharmacology, and therapeutics
Clinical applications of genomic science
Identification of novel genomic targets for drug development
Potential benefits of pharmacogenomics.