基于 1,000 名患者的计算机断层扫描诊断先天性腰椎管狭窄症的解剖参数。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
David Shin, Zachary Brandt, Mark Oliinik, Daniel Im, Mary Marciniak, Ethan Vyhmeister, Jacob Razzouk, Whitney Kagabo, Omar Ramos, Udochukwu Oyoyo, Nathaniel Wycliffe, Shaina A Lipa, Christopher M Bono, Wayne Cheng, Olumide Danisa
{"title":"基于 1,000 名患者的计算机断层扫描诊断先天性腰椎管狭窄症的解剖参数。","authors":"David Shin, Zachary Brandt, Mark Oliinik, Daniel Im, Mary Marciniak, Ethan Vyhmeister, Jacob Razzouk, Whitney Kagabo, Omar Ramos, Udochukwu Oyoyo, Nathaniel Wycliffe, Shaina A Lipa, Christopher M Bono, Wayne Cheng, Olumide Danisa","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of congenital lumbar stenosis (CLS) have yet to be universally accepted. This study establishes parameters for CLS using CT, assessing the influences of patient sex, race, ethnicity, and anthropometric characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interpedicular distance (IPD), pedicle length, canal diameter, and canal area were measured using 1,000 patients between 18 and 35 years of age who were without spinal pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Irrespective of disk level, threshold values for CLS were 16.1 mm for IPD, 3.9 mm for pedicle length, 11.5 mm for canal diameter, and 142.5 mm2 for canal area. Notable differences based on patient sex were observed, with men demonstrating larger CLS threshold values with respect to IPD and canal area across all vertebral levels from L1 to L5. Based on patient anthropometric factors, no strong or moderate associations were observed between any spinal measurement and patient height, weight, or body mass index across all levels from L1 to L5. However, notable differences were observed based on patient race and ethnicity from L1 to L5. Asian patients demonstrated the largest pedicle lengths, followed by White, Hispanic, and Black patients in descending order. White patients demonstrated the largest IPD, canal AP diameter, and canal area, followed by Asian, Hispanic, and Black patients in descending order. Black patients demonstrated the smallest values across all anatomic measurements relative to Asian, White, and Hispanic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reports 25,000 measurements of lumbar central canal dimensions to establish quantitative thresholds for the diagnosis of CLS. Although not influenced by patient height, weight, or body mass index as one might intuit, canal dimensions were influenced by patient sex, race, and ethnicity. These findings may help explain differences in predisposition or prevalence of lumbar nerve root compression among patients of different races, which can be important when considering rates of surgery and access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomic Parameters for Diagnosing Congenital Lumbar Stenosis Based on Computed Tomography of 1,000 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"David Shin, Zachary Brandt, Mark Oliinik, Daniel Im, Mary Marciniak, Ethan Vyhmeister, Jacob Razzouk, Whitney Kagabo, Omar Ramos, Udochukwu Oyoyo, Nathaniel Wycliffe, Shaina A Lipa, Christopher M Bono, Wayne Cheng, Olumide Danisa\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of congenital lumbar stenosis (CLS) have yet to be universally accepted. This study establishes parameters for CLS using CT, assessing the influences of patient sex, race, ethnicity, and anthropometric characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interpedicular distance (IPD), pedicle length, canal diameter, and canal area were measured using 1,000 patients between 18 and 35 years of age who were without spinal pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Irrespective of disk level, threshold values for CLS were 16.1 mm for IPD, 3.9 mm for pedicle length, 11.5 mm for canal diameter, and 142.5 mm2 for canal area. Notable differences based on patient sex were observed, with men demonstrating larger CLS threshold values with respect to IPD and canal area across all vertebral levels from L1 to L5. Based on patient anthropometric factors, no strong or moderate associations were observed between any spinal measurement and patient height, weight, or body mass index across all levels from L1 to L5. However, notable differences were observed based on patient race and ethnicity from L1 to L5. Asian patients demonstrated the largest pedicle lengths, followed by White, Hispanic, and Black patients in descending order. White patients demonstrated the largest IPD, canal AP diameter, and canal area, followed by Asian, Hispanic, and Black patients in descending order. Black patients demonstrated the smallest values across all anatomic measurements relative to Asian, White, and Hispanic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reports 25,000 measurements of lumbar central canal dimensions to establish quantitative thresholds for the diagnosis of CLS. Although not influenced by patient height, weight, or body mass index as one might intuit, canal dimensions were influenced by patient sex, race, and ethnicity. These findings may help explain differences in predisposition or prevalence of lumbar nerve root compression among patients of different races, which can be important when considering rates of surgery and access to care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00425\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:诊断先天性腰椎管狭窄症(CLS)的定量参数尚未得到普遍认可。本研究利用 CT 确定了先天性腰椎管狭窄症的参数,并评估了患者性别、种族、民族和人体测量特征的影响:方法:使用 1,000 名年龄在 18 至 35 岁之间、无脊柱病变的患者测量了关节间距(IPD)、椎弓根长度、椎管直径和椎管面积:无论椎间盘水平如何,CLS 的临界值分别为:IPD 16.1 毫米,椎弓根长度 3.9 毫米,椎管直径 11.5 毫米,椎管面积 142.5 平方毫米。观察到患者性别的显著差异,男性在 L1 至 L5 所有椎体水平的 IPD 和椎管面积方面都显示出更大的 CLS 临界值。根据患者的人体测量因素,在从 L1 到 L5 的所有椎体水平上,没有观察到任何脊柱测量值与患者身高、体重或体重指数之间存在强烈或中等程度的关联。然而,从 L1 到 L5,根据患者的种族和民族,观察到了明显的差异。亚裔患者的椎弓根长度最大,然后依次是白人、西班牙裔和黑人患者。白人患者的 IPD、椎管 AP 直径和椎管面积最大,从大到小依次为亚裔、西班牙裔和黑人患者。黑人患者的所有解剖测量值均小于亚裔、白人和西班牙裔患者:这项研究报告了 25,000 次腰椎管中心尺寸测量结果,为诊断 CLS 确定了定量阈值。虽然腰椎管尺寸不受患者身高、体重或体重指数的影响,但却受患者性别、种族和民族的影响。这些发现可能有助于解释不同种族患者在腰椎神经根压迫的易感性或患病率方面的差异,这在考虑手术率和就医机会时非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anatomic Parameters for Diagnosing Congenital Lumbar Stenosis Based on Computed Tomography of 1,000 Patients.

Introduction: Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of congenital lumbar stenosis (CLS) have yet to be universally accepted. This study establishes parameters for CLS using CT, assessing the influences of patient sex, race, ethnicity, and anthropometric characteristics.

Methods: Interpedicular distance (IPD), pedicle length, canal diameter, and canal area were measured using 1,000 patients between 18 and 35 years of age who were without spinal pathology.

Results: Irrespective of disk level, threshold values for CLS were 16.1 mm for IPD, 3.9 mm for pedicle length, 11.5 mm for canal diameter, and 142.5 mm2 for canal area. Notable differences based on patient sex were observed, with men demonstrating larger CLS threshold values with respect to IPD and canal area across all vertebral levels from L1 to L5. Based on patient anthropometric factors, no strong or moderate associations were observed between any spinal measurement and patient height, weight, or body mass index across all levels from L1 to L5. However, notable differences were observed based on patient race and ethnicity from L1 to L5. Asian patients demonstrated the largest pedicle lengths, followed by White, Hispanic, and Black patients in descending order. White patients demonstrated the largest IPD, canal AP diameter, and canal area, followed by Asian, Hispanic, and Black patients in descending order. Black patients demonstrated the smallest values across all anatomic measurements relative to Asian, White, and Hispanic patients.

Conclusion: This study reports 25,000 measurements of lumbar central canal dimensions to establish quantitative thresholds for the diagnosis of CLS. Although not influenced by patient height, weight, or body mass index as one might intuit, canal dimensions were influenced by patient sex, race, and ethnicity. These findings may help explain differences in predisposition or prevalence of lumbar nerve root compression among patients of different races, which can be important when considering rates of surgery and access to care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信