瑞马唑仑与异丙酚对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者麻醉诱导后低血压的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jae-Woo Ju , Dong Ju Lee , Jaeyeon Chung , Seohee Lee , Youn Joung Cho , Yunseok Jeon , Karam Nam
{"title":"瑞马唑仑与异丙酚对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者麻醉诱导后低血压的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Jae-Woo Ju ,&nbsp;Dong Ju Lee ,&nbsp;Jaeyeon Chung ,&nbsp;Seohee Lee ,&nbsp;Youn Joung Cho ,&nbsp;Yunseok Jeon ,&nbsp;Karam Nam","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><p>There is scarce evidence on the hemodynamic stability of remimazolam during anesthetic induction in patients with significant coronary artery disease. This study aims to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Tertiary teaching hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients were randomly allocated to received either remimazolam (<em>n</em> = 50) or propofol (n = 50) for anesthetic induction. The remimazolam group received an initial infusion at 6 mg/kg/h, which was later adjusted to 1–2 mg/kg/h to maintain a bispectral index of 40–60 after loss of consciousness. In the propofol group, a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of propofol was administered, followed by 1–1.5% sevoflurane inhalation as needed to achieve the target bispectral index.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) below the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the first 10 min after anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included the AUC for MAP &lt;65 mmHg and the requirement for vasopressors.</p></div><div><h3>Main Results</h3><p>The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly lower AUC under the baseline MAP compared to the propofol group (mean [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg·min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg·min; mean difference [95% confidence interval], 50.8 [10.4–91.2] mmHg·min; <em>P</em> = 0.014). Additionally, the remimazolam group had a reduced AUC for MAP &lt;65 mmHg (7.3 [10.3] mmHg·min vs. 13.9 [14.9] mmHg·min; <em>P</em> = 0.007) and a lower frequency of vasopressor use compared to the propofol group (60% vs. 88%, <em>P</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Remimazolam may offer improved hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in patients undergoing CABG, suggesting its potential advantage over propofol for patients with significant coronary artery disease in terms of hemodynamic stability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111580"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Jae-Woo Ju ,&nbsp;Dong Ju Lee ,&nbsp;Jaeyeon Chung ,&nbsp;Seohee Lee ,&nbsp;Youn Joung Cho ,&nbsp;Yunseok Jeon ,&nbsp;Karam Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><p>There is scarce evidence on the hemodynamic stability of remimazolam during anesthetic induction in patients with significant coronary artery disease. This study aims to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Tertiary teaching hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients were randomly allocated to received either remimazolam (<em>n</em> = 50) or propofol (n = 50) for anesthetic induction. The remimazolam group received an initial infusion at 6 mg/kg/h, which was later adjusted to 1–2 mg/kg/h to maintain a bispectral index of 40–60 after loss of consciousness. In the propofol group, a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of propofol was administered, followed by 1–1.5% sevoflurane inhalation as needed to achieve the target bispectral index.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) below the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the first 10 min after anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included the AUC for MAP &lt;65 mmHg and the requirement for vasopressors.</p></div><div><h3>Main Results</h3><p>The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly lower AUC under the baseline MAP compared to the propofol group (mean [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg·min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg·min; mean difference [95% confidence interval], 50.8 [10.4–91.2] mmHg·min; <em>P</em> = 0.014). Additionally, the remimazolam group had a reduced AUC for MAP &lt;65 mmHg (7.3 [10.3] mmHg·min vs. 13.9 [14.9] mmHg·min; <em>P</em> = 0.007) and a lower frequency of vasopressor use compared to the propofol group (60% vs. 88%, <em>P</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Remimazolam may offer improved hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in patients undergoing CABG, suggesting its potential advantage over propofol for patients with significant coronary artery disease in terms of hemodynamic stability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002095\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:目前尚无证据表明,在对患有严重冠状动脉疾病的患者进行麻醉诱导时,瑞马唑仑能稳定血流动力学。本研究旨在比较瑞马唑仑和异丙酚对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者诱导后低血压的影响:随机对照试验:地点:三级教学医院干预:随机分配患者接受瑞马唑仑(50 人)或异丙酚(50 人)麻醉诱导。雷马唑仑组的初始输注量为 6 毫克/千克/小时,之后调整为 1-2 毫克/千克/小时,以便在意识丧失后将双频谱指数维持在 40-60 之间。在异丙酚组,先注射1.5毫克/千克的异丙酚,然后根据需要吸入1-1.5%的七氟醚,以达到目标双光谱指数:主要结果是麻醉诱导后 10 分钟内低于基线平均动脉压 (MAP) 的曲线下面积 (AUC)。次要结果包括 MAP 的 AUC 主要结果:与异丙酚组相比,雷马唑仑组的基线平均动脉压曲线下的 AUC 明显更低(平均值 [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg-min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg-min;平均差 [95% 置信区间], 50.8 [10.4-91.2] mmHg-min;P = 0.014)。此外,雷马唑仑组的 MAP AUC 也有所降低:雷马唑仑可改善接受 CABG 手术患者麻醉诱导期间的血流动力学稳定性,这表明对于患有严重冠状动脉疾病的患者,雷马唑仑在血流动力学稳定性方面可能比丙泊酚更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial

Study Objective

There is scarce evidence on the hemodynamic stability of remimazolam during anesthetic induction in patients with significant coronary artery disease. This study aims to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Tertiary teaching hospital.

Patients

Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG.

Interventions

Patients were randomly allocated to received either remimazolam (n = 50) or propofol (n = 50) for anesthetic induction. The remimazolam group received an initial infusion at 6 mg/kg/h, which was later adjusted to 1–2 mg/kg/h to maintain a bispectral index of 40–60 after loss of consciousness. In the propofol group, a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of propofol was administered, followed by 1–1.5% sevoflurane inhalation as needed to achieve the target bispectral index.

Measurements

The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) below the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the first 10 min after anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included the AUC for MAP <65 mmHg and the requirement for vasopressors.

Main Results

The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly lower AUC under the baseline MAP compared to the propofol group (mean [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg·min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg·min; mean difference [95% confidence interval], 50.8 [10.4–91.2] mmHg·min; P = 0.014). Additionally, the remimazolam group had a reduced AUC for MAP <65 mmHg (7.3 [10.3] mmHg·min vs. 13.9 [14.9] mmHg·min; P = 0.007) and a lower frequency of vasopressor use compared to the propofol group (60% vs. 88%, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Remimazolam may offer improved hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in patients undergoing CABG, suggesting its potential advantage over propofol for patients with significant coronary artery disease in terms of hemodynamic stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信