接受轻度至中度风险非心脏手术的老年人的去氟烷与七氟烷麻醉及术后恢复--一项前瞻性、随机、观察者盲法临床试验。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Alexander Taschner (M.D.) , Edith Fleischmann (M.D.) , Katharina Horvath (M.D.) , Nikolas Adamowitsch (M.D.) , David Emler (M.D.) , Thomas Christian (M.D.) , Nicole Hantakova (M.D.) , Beatrix Hochreiter (BSc.) , Laura Höfer (M.S.) , Magdalena List (M.S.) , Barbara Rossi (M.S.) , Florian W. Zenz (M.S.) , Giulia Zanvettor (M.S.) , Oliver Zotti (M.S.) , Alexandra Graf (Ph.D.) , Melanie Fraunschiel (MSc.) , Christian Reiterer (M.D., Ph.D.)
{"title":"接受轻度至中度风险非心脏手术的老年人的去氟烷与七氟烷麻醉及术后恢复--一项前瞻性、随机、观察者盲法临床试验。","authors":"Alexander Taschner (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Edith Fleischmann (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Katharina Horvath (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Nikolas Adamowitsch (M.D.) ,&nbsp;David Emler (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Thomas Christian (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Nicole Hantakova (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Beatrix Hochreiter (BSc.) ,&nbsp;Laura Höfer (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Magdalena List (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Barbara Rossi (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Florian W. Zenz (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Giulia Zanvettor (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Oliver Zotti (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Alexandra Graf (Ph.D.) ,&nbsp;Melanie Fraunschiel (MSc.) ,&nbsp;Christian Reiterer (M.D., Ph.D.)","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>The effect of volatile anesthetics on postoperative recovery in older adults is still not entirely clear. Thus, we evaluated the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on speed of postoperative recovery in older adults eligible for same-day discharge. We further evaluated the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), bispectral index (BIS) values, and S100<img>B concentrations.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Single-center, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Operating room.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>190 patients ≥65 years of age and scheduled for minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Goal-directed administration of desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia with an intraoperative goal of BIS 50 ± 5.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was the time to anesthesia recovery, which was defined as the time between arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and reaching criteria for discharge from PACU, based on modified Aldrete score ≥ 12 points. Modified Aldrete scores were assessed at PACU arrival and thereafter in five-minute intervals. PONV was evaluated during PACU stay and the first three postoperative days, BIS values were recorded during PACU stay, and S100<img>B values were measured before and after surgery, and on the second postoperative day.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>95 patients were randomized to receive desflurane, and 95 patients to receive sevoflurane. We did not observe a significant difference in median duration of postoperative recovery between the groups (desflurane: 0 min [0;0]; sevoflurane: 0 min [0;0]; <em>p</em> = 0.245). 77 patients (81.1%) in the desflurane group and 84 patients (88.4%) in the sevoflurane group already had Aldrete scores ≥12 points upon arrival at PACU (<em>p</em> = 0.277). There was also no significant difference in the incidences of PONV (<em>p</em> = 0.606), postoperative BIS values (<em>p</em> = 0.197), and postoperative maximum S100<img>B concentrations (<em>p</em> = 0.821) between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite previous reports, we did not observe significant faster recovery times after desflurane anesthesia. Both volatile anesthetics may be appropriate for same-day discharge in older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111576"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002058/pdfft?md5=72f9f53f0ec76c4b2ddf1fe26c5b4bd3&pid=1-s2.0-S0952818024002058-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia and postoperative recovery in older adults undergoing minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery – A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Taschner (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Edith Fleischmann (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Katharina Horvath (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Nikolas Adamowitsch (M.D.) ,&nbsp;David Emler (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Thomas Christian (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Nicole Hantakova (M.D.) ,&nbsp;Beatrix Hochreiter (BSc.) ,&nbsp;Laura Höfer (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Magdalena List (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Barbara Rossi (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Florian W. Zenz (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Giulia Zanvettor (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Oliver Zotti (M.S.) ,&nbsp;Alexandra Graf (Ph.D.) ,&nbsp;Melanie Fraunschiel (MSc.) ,&nbsp;Christian Reiterer (M.D., Ph.D.)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>The effect of volatile anesthetics on postoperative recovery in older adults is still not entirely clear. Thus, we evaluated the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on speed of postoperative recovery in older adults eligible for same-day discharge. We further evaluated the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), bispectral index (BIS) values, and S100<img>B concentrations.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Single-center, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Operating room.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>190 patients ≥65 years of age and scheduled for minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Goal-directed administration of desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia with an intraoperative goal of BIS 50 ± 5.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was the time to anesthesia recovery, which was defined as the time between arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and reaching criteria for discharge from PACU, based on modified Aldrete score ≥ 12 points. Modified Aldrete scores were assessed at PACU arrival and thereafter in five-minute intervals. PONV was evaluated during PACU stay and the first three postoperative days, BIS values were recorded during PACU stay, and S100<img>B values were measured before and after surgery, and on the second postoperative day.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>95 patients were randomized to receive desflurane, and 95 patients to receive sevoflurane. We did not observe a significant difference in median duration of postoperative recovery between the groups (desflurane: 0 min [0;0]; sevoflurane: 0 min [0;0]; <em>p</em> = 0.245). 77 patients (81.1%) in the desflurane group and 84 patients (88.4%) in the sevoflurane group already had Aldrete scores ≥12 points upon arrival at PACU (<em>p</em> = 0.277). There was also no significant difference in the incidences of PONV (<em>p</em> = 0.606), postoperative BIS values (<em>p</em> = 0.197), and postoperative maximum S100<img>B concentrations (<em>p</em> = 0.821) between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite previous reports, we did not observe significant faster recovery times after desflurane anesthesia. Both volatile anesthetics may be appropriate for same-day discharge in older adults.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002058/pdfft?md5=72f9f53f0ec76c4b2ddf1fe26c5b4bd3&pid=1-s2.0-S0952818024002058-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002058\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的挥发性麻醉剂对老年人术后恢复的影响尚不完全清楚。因此,我们评估了地氟醚与七氟醚麻醉对符合当天出院条件的老年人术后恢复速度的影响。我们进一步评估了术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的发生率、双频谱指数(BIS)值和 S100B 浓度:设计:单中心、前瞻性、观察者盲法、随机临床试验:患者190名年龄≥65岁、计划接受轻度至中度风险非心脏手术的患者:干预措施:在目标引导下使用地氟醚与七氟醚维持麻醉,术中目标为BIS 50 ± 5:主要结果是麻醉恢复时间,即到达麻醉后护理病房(PACU)到达到 PACU 出院标准之间的时间(基于修正的 Aldrete 评分≥ 12 分)。改良 Aldrete 评分在患者到达 PACU 时进行评估,之后每隔 5 分钟评估一次。在 PACU 住院期间和术后前三天评估 PONV,在 PACU 住院期间记录 BIS 值,在手术前后和术后第二天测量 S100B 值:95名患者随机接受地氟醚治疗,95名患者随机接受七氟醚治疗。我们没有观察到两组患者术后恢复的中位时间有明显差异(地氟烷:0 min [0;0];七氟烷:0 min [0;0];P = 0.245)。到达 PACU 时,地氟醚组有 77 名患者(81.1%)和七氟醚组有 84 名患者(88.4%)的 Aldrete 评分已≥12 分(p = 0.277)。两组间的 PONV 发生率(p = 0.606)、术后 BIS 值(p = 0.197)和术后 S100B 最大浓度(p = 0.821)也无明显差异:结论:尽管之前已有报道,但我们并未观察到地氟醚麻醉后恢复时间明显加快。两种挥发性麻醉药都适合老年人当天出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia and postoperative recovery in older adults undergoing minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery – A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial

Study objective

The effect of volatile anesthetics on postoperative recovery in older adults is still not entirely clear. Thus, we evaluated the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on speed of postoperative recovery in older adults eligible for same-day discharge. We further evaluated the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), bispectral index (BIS) values, and S100B concentrations.

Design

Single-center, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Setting

Operating room.

Patients

190 patients ≥65 years of age and scheduled for minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgeries.

Interventions

Goal-directed administration of desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia with an intraoperative goal of BIS 50 ± 5.

Measurements

The primary outcome was the time to anesthesia recovery, which was defined as the time between arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and reaching criteria for discharge from PACU, based on modified Aldrete score ≥ 12 points. Modified Aldrete scores were assessed at PACU arrival and thereafter in five-minute intervals. PONV was evaluated during PACU stay and the first three postoperative days, BIS values were recorded during PACU stay, and S100B values were measured before and after surgery, and on the second postoperative day.

Main results

95 patients were randomized to receive desflurane, and 95 patients to receive sevoflurane. We did not observe a significant difference in median duration of postoperative recovery between the groups (desflurane: 0 min [0;0]; sevoflurane: 0 min [0;0]; p = 0.245). 77 patients (81.1%) in the desflurane group and 84 patients (88.4%) in the sevoflurane group already had Aldrete scores ≥12 points upon arrival at PACU (p = 0.277). There was also no significant difference in the incidences of PONV (p = 0.606), postoperative BIS values (p = 0.197), and postoperative maximum S100B concentrations (p = 0.821) between the groups.

Conclusions

Despite previous reports, we did not observe significant faster recovery times after desflurane anesthesia. Both volatile anesthetics may be appropriate for same-day discharge in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信