模拟对尼古丁危害的准确和不准确认知对人群健康的影响。

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Thaddaeus Hannel, Lai Wei, Raheema S Muhammad-Kah, Edward G Largo, Mohamadi Sarkar
{"title":"模拟对尼古丁危害的准确和不准确认知对人群健康的影响。","authors":"Thaddaeus Hannel, Lai Wei, Raheema S Muhammad-Kah, Edward G Largo, Mohamadi Sarkar","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01059-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that inhaling the smoke from the combustion of cigarettes is responsible for most of the harm caused by smoking, and not the nicotine. However, a majority of U.S. adults who smoke inaccurately believe that nicotine causes cancer which may be a significant barrier, preventing switching to potentially reduced risk, non-combustible products like electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and smokeless tobacco (ST). We assessed the population health impact associated with nicotine perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a previously validated agent-based model to the U.S. population, we analyzed nationally representative data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to estimate base case rates of sustained (maintained over four waves) cessation and switching to non-combustible product use, by sex. Nicotine perception scenarios were determined from PATH data. The overall switch rate from smoking in Wave 4 to non-combustible product use in Wave 5 (3.94%) was stratified based on responses to the nicotine perception question \"Do you believe nicotine is the chemical that causes most of the cancer caused by smoking cigarettes?\", (four-item scale from \"Definitely not\" to \"Definitely yes\"). The relative percent change between the overall and stratified rates, corresponding to each item, was used to adjust the base case rates of switching, to determine the impact, if all adults who smoke exhibited switching behaviors based on responses to the nicotine perceptions question. The public health impact of nicotine perceptions was estimated as the difference in all-cause mortality between the base case and the four nicotine perception scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Switch rates associated with those who responded, \"Definitely not\" (8.39%) resulted in a net benefit of preventing nearly 800,000 premature deaths over an 85-year period. Conversely switch rates reflective of those who responded, \"Definitely yes\" (2.59%) resulted in a net harm of nearly 300,000 additional premature deaths over the same period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accurate knowledge regarding the role of nicotine is associated with higher switch rates and prevention of premature deaths. Our findings suggest that promoting public education to correct perceptions of harm from nicotine has the potential to benefit public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11312148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling the population health impact of accurate and inaccurate perceptions of harm from nicotine.\",\"authors\":\"Thaddaeus Hannel, Lai Wei, Raheema S Muhammad-Kah, Edward G Largo, Mohamadi Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12954-024-01059-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that inhaling the smoke from the combustion of cigarettes is responsible for most of the harm caused by smoking, and not the nicotine. However, a majority of U.S. adults who smoke inaccurately believe that nicotine causes cancer which may be a significant barrier, preventing switching to potentially reduced risk, non-combustible products like electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and smokeless tobacco (ST). We assessed the population health impact associated with nicotine perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a previously validated agent-based model to the U.S. population, we analyzed nationally representative data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to estimate base case rates of sustained (maintained over four waves) cessation and switching to non-combustible product use, by sex. Nicotine perception scenarios were determined from PATH data. The overall switch rate from smoking in Wave 4 to non-combustible product use in Wave 5 (3.94%) was stratified based on responses to the nicotine perception question \\\"Do you believe nicotine is the chemical that causes most of the cancer caused by smoking cigarettes?\\\", (four-item scale from \\\"Definitely not\\\" to \\\"Definitely yes\\\"). The relative percent change between the overall and stratified rates, corresponding to each item, was used to adjust the base case rates of switching, to determine the impact, if all adults who smoke exhibited switching behaviors based on responses to the nicotine perceptions question. The public health impact of nicotine perceptions was estimated as the difference in all-cause mortality between the base case and the four nicotine perception scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Switch rates associated with those who responded, \\\"Definitely not\\\" (8.39%) resulted in a net benefit of preventing nearly 800,000 premature deaths over an 85-year period. Conversely switch rates reflective of those who responded, \\\"Definitely yes\\\" (2.59%) resulted in a net harm of nearly 300,000 additional premature deaths over the same period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accurate knowledge regarding the role of nicotine is associated with higher switch rates and prevention of premature deaths. Our findings suggest that promoting public education to correct perceptions of harm from nicotine has the potential to benefit public health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11312148/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01059-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01059-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:科学证据清楚地表明,吸入香烟燃烧产生的烟雾是造成吸烟危害的主要原因,而不是尼古丁。然而,大多数吸烟的美国成年人不准确地认为尼古丁会致癌,这可能是阻碍他们转而使用电子尼古丁递送系统(ENDS)和无烟烟草(ST)等可能降低风险的非燃烧产品的一个重要障碍。我们评估了与尼古丁认知相关的人群健康影响:我们使用先前验证过的基于代理的美国人口模型,分析了烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究中具有全国代表性的数据,按性别估算了持续(维持四次)戒烟和转用非燃烧产品的基本情况比率。尼古丁认知情景是根据 PATH 数据确定的。根据对尼古丁认知问题 "您是否认为尼古丁是导致大部分因吸烟而致癌的化学物质?"的回答(从 "肯定不是 "到 "肯定是 "的四项目量表),对从第四波吸烟到第五波使用非燃烧产品的总体转换率(3.94%)进行了分层。总比率与分层比率之间的相对百分比变化(与每个项目相对应)被用来调整基本情况下的转换率,以确定如果所有吸烟成年人都根据对尼古丁认知问题的回答表现出转换行为所产生的影响。尼古丁认知对公共健康的影响被估算为基础方案与四种尼古丁认知方案之间全因死亡率的差异:结果:回答 "肯定不会 "者的转换率(8.39%)在 85 年内可防止近 80 万人过早死亡。相反,那些回答 "肯定是 "的人的换烟率(2.59%)则导致了同期近 30 万人过早死亡的净损失:结论:对尼古丁作用的准确认识与提高换烟率和防止过早死亡有关。我们的研究结果表明,促进公众教育以纠正对尼古丁危害的认识有可能有益于公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling the population health impact of accurate and inaccurate perceptions of harm from nicotine.

Background: Scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that inhaling the smoke from the combustion of cigarettes is responsible for most of the harm caused by smoking, and not the nicotine. However, a majority of U.S. adults who smoke inaccurately believe that nicotine causes cancer which may be a significant barrier, preventing switching to potentially reduced risk, non-combustible products like electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and smokeless tobacco (ST). We assessed the population health impact associated with nicotine perceptions.

Methods: Using a previously validated agent-based model to the U.S. population, we analyzed nationally representative data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to estimate base case rates of sustained (maintained over four waves) cessation and switching to non-combustible product use, by sex. Nicotine perception scenarios were determined from PATH data. The overall switch rate from smoking in Wave 4 to non-combustible product use in Wave 5 (3.94%) was stratified based on responses to the nicotine perception question "Do you believe nicotine is the chemical that causes most of the cancer caused by smoking cigarettes?", (four-item scale from "Definitely not" to "Definitely yes"). The relative percent change between the overall and stratified rates, corresponding to each item, was used to adjust the base case rates of switching, to determine the impact, if all adults who smoke exhibited switching behaviors based on responses to the nicotine perceptions question. The public health impact of nicotine perceptions was estimated as the difference in all-cause mortality between the base case and the four nicotine perception scenarios.

Results: Switch rates associated with those who responded, "Definitely not" (8.39%) resulted in a net benefit of preventing nearly 800,000 premature deaths over an 85-year period. Conversely switch rates reflective of those who responded, "Definitely yes" (2.59%) resulted in a net harm of nearly 300,000 additional premature deaths over the same period.

Conclusions: Accurate knowledge regarding the role of nicotine is associated with higher switch rates and prevention of premature deaths. Our findings suggest that promoting public education to correct perceptions of harm from nicotine has the potential to benefit public health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信