使用心脏动力指数预测俯卧位的液体反应性:概念验证研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
{"title":"使用心脏动力指数预测俯卧位的液体反应性:概念验证研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The primary aim of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate whether the Cardiac Power Index (CPI) could be a novel alternative method to assess fluid responsiveness in the prone position.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing scheduled elective lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia were enrolled in the criteria of patients aged 19–75 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II. The hemodynamic variables were evaluated before and after changes in posture after administering a colloid bolus (5 mL.kg<sup>−1</sup>) in the prone position. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in the Stroke Volume Index (SVI) ≥ 10%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 28 patients were enrolled. In responders, the CPI (median [1/4Q–3/4Q]) decreased to 0.34 [0.28–0.39] W.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> = 0.035) after the prone position. After following fluid loading, CPI increased to 0.48 [0.37–0.52] W.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.008), and decreased SVI (median [1/4Q–3/4Q]) after prone increased from 26.0 [24.5–28.0] mL.m<sup>−2</sup> to 33.0 [31.0–37.5] mL.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> = 0.014). Among non-responders, CPI decreased to 0.43 [0.28–0.53] W.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> = 0.011), and SVI decreased to 29.0 [23.5–34.8] mL.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.009). CPI exhibited predictive capabilities for fluid responsiveness as a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.60–0.95; <em>p</em> = 0.025].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study suggests the potential of CPI as an alternative method to existing preload indices in assessing fluid responsiveness in clinical scenarios, offering potential benefits for responders and non-responders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000678/pdfft?md5=d7625cbc8d82045ec94d11b5fa3f31e5&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001424000678-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the cardiac power index to predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position: a proof-of-concept study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The primary aim of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate whether the Cardiac Power Index (CPI) could be a novel alternative method to assess fluid responsiveness in the prone position.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing scheduled elective lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia were enrolled in the criteria of patients aged 19–75 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II. The hemodynamic variables were evaluated before and after changes in posture after administering a colloid bolus (5 mL.kg<sup>−1</sup>) in the prone position. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in the Stroke Volume Index (SVI) ≥ 10%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 28 patients were enrolled. In responders, the CPI (median [1/4Q–3/4Q]) decreased to 0.34 [0.28–0.39] W.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> = 0.035) after the prone position. After following fluid loading, CPI increased to 0.48 [0.37–0.52] W.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.008), and decreased SVI (median [1/4Q–3/4Q]) after prone increased from 26.0 [24.5–28.0] mL.m<sup>−2</sup> to 33.0 [31.0–37.5] mL.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> = 0.014). Among non-responders, CPI decreased to 0.43 [0.28–0.53] W.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> = 0.011), and SVI decreased to 29.0 [23.5–34.8] mL.m<sup>−2</sup> (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.009). CPI exhibited predictive capabilities for fluid responsiveness as a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.60–0.95; <em>p</em> = 0.025].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study suggests the potential of CPI as an alternative method to existing preload indices in assessing fluid responsiveness in clinical scenarios, offering potential benefits for responders and non-responders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000678/pdfft?md5=d7625cbc8d82045ec94d11b5fa3f31e5&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001424000678-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000678\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这项概念验证研究的主要目的是探讨心动力指数(CPI)是否可以作为评估俯卧位体液反应性的新方法:本概念验证研究的主要目的是探讨心动力指数(CPI)是否可以作为评估俯卧位体液反应性的一种新型替代方法:方法:根据美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况 I-II 级、年龄在 19-75 岁之间的患者标准,选取在全身麻醉下俯卧位接受预定腰椎手术的患者。在俯卧位注射胶体栓剂(5 mL.kg-1)后改变体位之前和之后,对血液动力学变量进行了评估。脑卒中容积指数(SVI)增加≥10%即为液体反应性:结果:共有 28 名患者入选。在有反应者中,俯卧位后 CPI(中位数 [1/4Q-3/4Q] )降至 0.34 [0.28-0.39] W.m-2 (p = 0.035)。继液体负荷后,CPI 增加到 0.48 [0.37-0.52] W.m-2 (p < 0.008),俯卧位后 SVI(中位数 [1/4Q-3/4Q] )从 26.0 [24.5-28.0] mL.m-2 增加到 33.0 [31.0-37.5] mL.m-2 (p = 0.014)。在无应答者中,CPI 降至 0.43 [0.28-0.53] W.m-2 (p = 0.011),SVI 降至 29.0 [23.5-34.8] mL.m-2 (p < 0.009)。CPI 对输液反应性的预测能力为 0.78 [95% 置信区间,0.60-0.95;p = 0.025]:本研究表明,CPI 可作为现有前负荷指数的替代方法,用于评估临床情况下的输液反应性,为有反应者和无反应者提供潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of the cardiac power index to predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position: a proof-of-concept study

Background

The primary aim of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate whether the Cardiac Power Index (CPI) could be a novel alternative method to assess fluid responsiveness in the prone position.

Methods

Patients undergoing scheduled elective lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia were enrolled in the criteria of patients aged 19–75 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II. The hemodynamic variables were evaluated before and after changes in posture after administering a colloid bolus (5 mL.kg−1) in the prone position. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in the Stroke Volume Index (SVI) ≥ 10%.

Results

A total of 28 patients were enrolled. In responders, the CPI (median [1/4Q–3/4Q]) decreased to 0.34 [0.28–0.39] W.m−2 (p = 0.035) after the prone position. After following fluid loading, CPI increased to 0.48 [0.37–0.52] W.m−2 (p < 0.008), and decreased SVI (median [1/4Q–3/4Q]) after prone increased from 26.0 [24.5–28.0] mL.m−2 to 33.0 [31.0–37.5] mL.m−2 (p = 0.014). Among non-responders, CPI decreased to 0.43 [0.28–0.53] W.m−2 (p = 0.011), and SVI decreased to 29.0 [23.5–34.8] mL.m−2 (p < 0.009). CPI exhibited predictive capabilities for fluid responsiveness as a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.60–0.95; p = 0.025].

Conclusion

This study suggests the potential of CPI as an alternative method to existing preload indices in assessing fluid responsiveness in clinical scenarios, offering potential benefits for responders and non-responders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信