有证据表明,特定的人际关系有助于调节可能患有重度抑郁症的人的抑郁症状和相关结构。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Brian Lakey
{"title":"有证据表明,特定的人际关系有助于调节可能患有重度抑郁症的人的抑郁症状和相关结构。","authors":"Brian Lakey","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2024.2388843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Relational regulation theory describes how social network members (<i>providers of regulation</i>) help people (<i>recipients of regulation</i>) regulate their effect, actions and thoughts through mostly ordinary social interaction. Regulation is relational when the ability of a provider to regulate a recipient is an emergent property of the dyad and not a stable property of the provider or recipient. Research in predominantly well samples has found that dyads evoked affect and self-relevant thought in recipients. The present research examined whether such effects occurred among people with probable major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national, internet sample of 2058 US residents was screened for probable MDD. Depressed recipients (N = 152) rated their experience of depression-related constructs when with or thinking about specific providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recipients' reports of affect and thought varied strongly depending on the dyad they were with or thinking about. These effects occurred for depressive symptoms, positive and negative affect, self-esteem, negative automatic thoughts, hopelessness, excessive reassurance-seeking, reappraisal and emotion suppression. Dyads that evoked depression-related experiences were seen by participants as unsupportive and as evoking conflict.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relational regulation appears to occur among people with MDD which provides new insights about interpersonal processes in depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence that specific personal relationships help regulate depressive symptoms and related constructs among people with probable major depressive disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Lakey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2024.2388843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Relational regulation theory describes how social network members (<i>providers of regulation</i>) help people (<i>recipients of regulation</i>) regulate their effect, actions and thoughts through mostly ordinary social interaction. Regulation is relational when the ability of a provider to regulate a recipient is an emergent property of the dyad and not a stable property of the provider or recipient. Research in predominantly well samples has found that dyads evoked affect and self-relevant thought in recipients. The present research examined whether such effects occurred among people with probable major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national, internet sample of 2058 US residents was screened for probable MDD. Depressed recipients (N = 152) rated their experience of depression-related constructs when with or thinking about specific providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recipients' reports of affect and thought varied strongly depending on the dyad they were with or thinking about. These effects occurred for depressive symptoms, positive and negative affect, self-esteem, negative automatic thoughts, hopelessness, excessive reassurance-seeking, reappraisal and emotion suppression. Dyads that evoked depression-related experiences were seen by participants as unsupportive and as evoking conflict.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relational regulation appears to occur among people with MDD which provides new insights about interpersonal processes in depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2388843\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2388843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言关系调节理论描述了社会网络成员(调节提供者)如何通过大多数普通的社会互动,帮助人们(调节接受者)调节他们的效果、行动和思想。如果调节提供者调节接受者的能力是二人关系的一种新兴属性,而不是提供者或接受者的一种稳定属性,那么这种调节就是关系调节。在主要是健康样本中进行的研究发现,二人组会唤起接受者的情感和自我相关思维。本研究对可能患有重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的人是否会产生这种影响进行了调查:方法:对 2058 名美国居民进行了可能患有重度抑郁症的全国性互联网样本筛查。抑郁的受访者(152 人)对他们与特定服务提供者在一起或想到特定服务提供者时的抑郁相关体验进行评分:结果:受助者对情感和想法的报告因他们与哪位服务提供者在一起或想到哪位服务提供者而有很大不同。抑郁症状、积极和消极情绪、自尊、消极的自动想法、绝望、过度寻求保证、重新评价和情绪抑制都会产生这些影响。参与者认为,唤起抑郁相关体验的组合是不支持性的,而且会引起冲突:结论:多发性抑郁症患者中似乎存在关系调节,这为抑郁症的人际交往过程提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence that specific personal relationships help regulate depressive symptoms and related constructs among people with probable major depressive disorder.

Introduction: Relational regulation theory describes how social network members (providers of regulation) help people (recipients of regulation) regulate their effect, actions and thoughts through mostly ordinary social interaction. Regulation is relational when the ability of a provider to regulate a recipient is an emergent property of the dyad and not a stable property of the provider or recipient. Research in predominantly well samples has found that dyads evoked affect and self-relevant thought in recipients. The present research examined whether such effects occurred among people with probable major depressive disorder (MDD).

Methods: A national, internet sample of 2058 US residents was screened for probable MDD. Depressed recipients (N = 152) rated their experience of depression-related constructs when with or thinking about specific providers.

Results: Recipients' reports of affect and thought varied strongly depending on the dyad they were with or thinking about. These effects occurred for depressive symptoms, positive and negative affect, self-esteem, negative automatic thoughts, hopelessness, excessive reassurance-seeking, reappraisal and emotion suppression. Dyads that evoked depression-related experiences were seen by participants as unsupportive and as evoking conflict.

Conclusion: Relational regulation appears to occur among people with MDD which provides new insights about interpersonal processes in depression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信