根据中低收入国家大学医院的经验预测儿科困难插管的因素:前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Anouar Jarraya, Manel Kammoun, Hind Ketata, Hasna Bouchaira, Saloua Ammar, Riadh Mhiri
{"title":"根据中低收入国家大学医院的经验预测儿科困难插管的因素:前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Anouar Jarraya, Manel Kammoun, Hind Ketata, Hasna Bouchaira, Saloua Ammar, Riadh Mhiri","doi":"10.1177/17504589241264404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Difficult airway management is one of the main challenges in paediatric anaesthesia, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the main predictors of difficult paediatric intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, we included all children aged less than five years undergoing intra-abdominal surgery with endotracheal intubation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the incidence of difficult intubation. Then, we investigated predictors for difficult paediatric intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 217 children, and difficult intubation was observed in 10% of them. Predictors were as follows: Mallampati III-IV class (adjusted odds ratio = 2.21; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-6.4), limited mouth opening (adjusted odds ratio = 2.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.8-3.5), facial dysmorphia (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.32-7.4) and anaesthesia without muscle relaxant (adjusted odds ratio = 1.8; 95% confidence interval = 1.0-5.1) or without opioids during crash inductions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-4.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Facial dysmorphia and limited mouth opening were predictors of difficult intubation in children. Furthermore, it seems that Mallampati class and anaesthesia technique may also predict challenging intubation, which may guide us to change our perioperative practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of paediatric difficult intubation according to the experience of a university hospital in a low- and middle-income country: A prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Anouar Jarraya, Manel Kammoun, Hind Ketata, Hasna Bouchaira, Saloua Ammar, Riadh Mhiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17504589241264404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Difficult airway management is one of the main challenges in paediatric anaesthesia, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the main predictors of difficult paediatric intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, we included all children aged less than five years undergoing intra-abdominal surgery with endotracheal intubation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the incidence of difficult intubation. Then, we investigated predictors for difficult paediatric intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 217 children, and difficult intubation was observed in 10% of them. Predictors were as follows: Mallampati III-IV class (adjusted odds ratio = 2.21; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-6.4), limited mouth opening (adjusted odds ratio = 2.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.8-3.5), facial dysmorphia (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.32-7.4) and anaesthesia without muscle relaxant (adjusted odds ratio = 1.8; 95% confidence interval = 1.0-5.1) or without opioids during crash inductions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-4.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Facial dysmorphia and limited mouth opening were predictors of difficult intubation in children. Furthermore, it seems that Mallampati class and anaesthesia technique may also predict challenging intubation, which may guide us to change our perioperative practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241264404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241264404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:困难气道管理是儿科麻醉的主要挑战之一,尤其是在中低收入国家。目的:本研究旨在调查儿科插管困难的主要预测因素:在这项观察性研究中,我们纳入了所有接受气管插管腹腔手术的五岁以下儿童。根据插管困难的发生率将患者分为两组。然后,我们对儿科插管困难的预测因素进行了调查:结果:我们共纳入了 217 名儿童,其中 10%的儿童发生了困难插管。预测因素如下马兰帕蒂 III-IV 级(调整后的几率比 = 2.21;95% 置信区间 = 1.1-6.4)、张口受限(调整后的几率比 = 2.4;95% 置信区间 = 1.8-3.5)、面部畸形(调整后的几率比 = 2.6;95% 置信区间 = 1.32-7.4)和无肌肉松弛剂的麻醉(调整后的几率比=1.8;95%置信区间=1.0-5.1)或坠床诱导时无阿片类药物(调整后的几率比=1.7;95%置信区间=1.01-4.8):结论:面部畸形和张口受限是儿童插管困难的预测因素。结论:面部畸形和张口受限是儿童插管困难的预测因素,此外,马兰帕蒂分级和麻醉技术似乎也可预测插管困难,这可指导我们改变围手术期的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of paediatric difficult intubation according to the experience of a university hospital in a low- and middle-income country: A prospective observational study.

Background: Difficult airway management is one of the main challenges in paediatric anaesthesia, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the main predictors of difficult paediatric intubation.

Methods: In this observational study, we included all children aged less than five years undergoing intra-abdominal surgery with endotracheal intubation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the incidence of difficult intubation. Then, we investigated predictors for difficult paediatric intubation.

Results: We included 217 children, and difficult intubation was observed in 10% of them. Predictors were as follows: Mallampati III-IV class (adjusted odds ratio = 2.21; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-6.4), limited mouth opening (adjusted odds ratio = 2.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.8-3.5), facial dysmorphia (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.32-7.4) and anaesthesia without muscle relaxant (adjusted odds ratio = 1.8; 95% confidence interval = 1.0-5.1) or without opioids during crash inductions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-4.8).

Conclusion: Facial dysmorphia and limited mouth opening were predictors of difficult intubation in children. Furthermore, it seems that Mallampati class and anaesthesia technique may also predict challenging intubation, which may guide us to change our perioperative practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信