从放射学报告中识别肺栓塞患者的便携式方法的推导和外部验证:READ-PE 算法。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
{"title":"从放射学报告中识别肺栓塞患者的便携式方法的推导和外部验证:READ-PE 算法。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Identification of pulmonary embolism (PE) across a cohort currently requires burdensome manual review. Previous approaches to automate capture of PE diagnosis have either been too complex for widespread use or have lacked external validation. We sought to develop and validate the Regular Expression Aided Determination of PE (READ-PE) algorithm, which uses a portable text-matching approach to identify PE in reports from computed tomography with angiography (CTA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We identified derivation and validation cohorts of final radiology reports for CTAs obtained on adults (≥ 18 years) at two independent, quaternary academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. All reports were in the English language. We manually reviewed CTA reports for PE as a reference standard. In the derivation cohort, we developed the READ-PE algorithm by iteratively combining regular expressions to identify PE. We validated the READ-PE algorithm in an independent cohort, and compared performance against three prior algorithms with sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive-value (PPV), negative-predictive-value (NPV), and the F1 score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2948 CTAs in the derivation cohort 10.8 % had PE and the READ-PE algorithm reached 93 % sensitivity, 99 % specificity, 94 % PPV, 99 % NPV, and 0.93 F1 score, compared to F1 scores ranging from 0.50 to 0.85 for three prior algorithms. Among 1206 CTAs in the validation cohort 9.2 % had PE and the algorithm had 98 % sensitivity, 98 % specificity, 85 % PPV, 100 % NPV, and 0.91 F1 score.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The externally validated READ-PE algorithm identifies PE in English-language reports from CTAs obtained in the ED with high accuracy. This algorithm may be used in the electronic health record to accurately identify PE for research or surveillance. If implemented at other EDs, it should first undergo local validation and may require maintenance over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824002378/pdfft?md5=25e153671aeaa0ef391242fe9324f9ea&pid=1-s2.0-S0049384824002378-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation and external validation of a portable method to identify patients with pulmonary embolism from radiology reports: The READ-PE algorithm\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Identification of pulmonary embolism (PE) across a cohort currently requires burdensome manual review. Previous approaches to automate capture of PE diagnosis have either been too complex for widespread use or have lacked external validation. We sought to develop and validate the Regular Expression Aided Determination of PE (READ-PE) algorithm, which uses a portable text-matching approach to identify PE in reports from computed tomography with angiography (CTA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We identified derivation and validation cohorts of final radiology reports for CTAs obtained on adults (≥ 18 years) at two independent, quaternary academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. All reports were in the English language. We manually reviewed CTA reports for PE as a reference standard. In the derivation cohort, we developed the READ-PE algorithm by iteratively combining regular expressions to identify PE. We validated the READ-PE algorithm in an independent cohort, and compared performance against three prior algorithms with sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive-value (PPV), negative-predictive-value (NPV), and the F1 score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2948 CTAs in the derivation cohort 10.8 % had PE and the READ-PE algorithm reached 93 % sensitivity, 99 % specificity, 94 % PPV, 99 % NPV, and 0.93 F1 score, compared to F1 scores ranging from 0.50 to 0.85 for three prior algorithms. Among 1206 CTAs in the validation cohort 9.2 % had PE and the algorithm had 98 % sensitivity, 98 % specificity, 85 % PPV, 100 % NPV, and 0.91 F1 score.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The externally validated READ-PE algorithm identifies PE in English-language reports from CTAs obtained in the ED with high accuracy. This algorithm may be used in the electronic health record to accurately identify PE for research or surveillance. If implemented at other EDs, it should first undergo local validation and may require maintenance over time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824002378/pdfft?md5=25e153671aeaa0ef391242fe9324f9ea&pid=1-s2.0-S0049384824002378-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824002378\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824002378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,在一个队列中识别肺栓塞(PE)需要繁重的人工审核。以前自动采集肺栓塞诊断的方法要么过于复杂,无法广泛使用,要么缺乏外部验证。我们试图开发并验证正则表达式辅助肺栓塞诊断(READ-PE)算法,该算法采用便携式文本匹配方法来识别计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)报告中的肺栓塞:方法:我们在美国两个独立的四级学术急诊科(ED)确定了成人(≥ 18 岁)CTA 最终放射学报告的衍生和验证队列。所有报告均为英文。作为参考标准,我们对CTA报告进行了PE人工复查。在衍生队列中,我们通过反复组合正则表达式来识别 PE,从而开发出 READ-PE 算法。我们在一个独立队列中验证了 READ-PE 算法,并通过灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV)、阴性预测值 (NPV) 和 F1 分数与之前的三种算法进行了比较:在推导队列的 2948 例 CTA 中,10.8% 患有 PE,READ-PE 算法的灵敏度为 93%,特异性为 99%,PPV 为 94%,NPV 为 99%,F1 得分为 0.93,而之前三种算法的 F1 得分为 0.50 至 0.85。在验证队列的1206例CTA中,9.2%患有PE,该算法的敏感性为98%,特异性为98%,PPV为85%,NPV为100%,F1得分为0.91:经过外部验证的 READ-PE 算法能在急诊室获得的 CTA 英文报告中准确识别出 PE。该算法可用于电子健康记录,为研究或监测准确识别 PE。如果在其他急诊室使用,应首先进行本地验证,并可能需要长期维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivation and external validation of a portable method to identify patients with pulmonary embolism from radiology reports: The READ-PE algorithm

Background

Identification of pulmonary embolism (PE) across a cohort currently requires burdensome manual review. Previous approaches to automate capture of PE diagnosis have either been too complex for widespread use or have lacked external validation. We sought to develop and validate the Regular Expression Aided Determination of PE (READ-PE) algorithm, which uses a portable text-matching approach to identify PE in reports from computed tomography with angiography (CTA).

Methods

We identified derivation and validation cohorts of final radiology reports for CTAs obtained on adults (≥ 18 years) at two independent, quaternary academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. All reports were in the English language. We manually reviewed CTA reports for PE as a reference standard. In the derivation cohort, we developed the READ-PE algorithm by iteratively combining regular expressions to identify PE. We validated the READ-PE algorithm in an independent cohort, and compared performance against three prior algorithms with sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive-value (PPV), negative-predictive-value (NPV), and the F1 score.

Results

Among 2948 CTAs in the derivation cohort 10.8 % had PE and the READ-PE algorithm reached 93 % sensitivity, 99 % specificity, 94 % PPV, 99 % NPV, and 0.93 F1 score, compared to F1 scores ranging from 0.50 to 0.85 for three prior algorithms. Among 1206 CTAs in the validation cohort 9.2 % had PE and the algorithm had 98 % sensitivity, 98 % specificity, 85 % PPV, 100 % NPV, and 0.91 F1 score.

Conclusions

The externally validated READ-PE algorithm identifies PE in English-language reports from CTAs obtained in the ED with high accuracy. This algorithm may be used in the electronic health record to accurately identify PE for research or surveillance. If implemented at other EDs, it should first undergo local validation and may require maintenance over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis research
Thrombosis research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
364
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信