Ronan P Sugrue, Jaxon Olsen, Marie Elise Abi Antoun, Lesley A Skalla, Jennifer Cate, Andra H James, Alexandra Stonehill, Virginia Watkins, Marilyn J Telen, Jerome J Federspiel
{"title":"标准红细胞抗原配型与扩展红细胞抗原配型在预防胎儿和新生儿溶血病方面的比较：系统回顾。","authors":"Ronan P Sugrue, Jaxon Olsen, Marie Elise Abi Antoun, Lesley A Skalla, Jennifer Cate, Andra H James, Alexandra Stonehill, Virginia Watkins, Marilyn J Telen, Jerome J Federspiel","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and meta-analyze alloimmunization among recipients of red blood cells (RBCs) matched for ABO blood type and Rhesus D (ABO+D) antigen compared with those also matched for c, E, and Kell (cEK).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Four online databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched from March 28, 2023, to April 1, 2024. The search protocol was peer reviewed and published on PROSPERO ( CRD42023411620 ).</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Studies reporting alloimmunization as the primary outcome among recipients of RBCs matched for ABO+D or additional cEK matching were included. Patients transfused with unmatched RBCs or a mixture of matching regimens were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies and Tool for Risk of Bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to combine effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Ten studies met criteria. Risk of bias was low. Overall, 91,221 patients were transfused, of whom 40,220 (44.1%) received additional cEK-matched RBCs. The overall rate of alloimmunization was 6.2% (95% CI, 2.5-14.9%) for ABO+D-only matching and 1.9% (95% CI, 0.7-5.1%) when cEK was added. Time of follow-up antibody testing ranged from 6 to 18 months after transfusion. Additional cEK match was associated with significantly less alloimmunization compared with standard ABO+D match (odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% CI, 0.20-0.69). This association remained when chronically transfused patients were excluded (OR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.54-0.79) and for alloimmunization to c, E, or K antigens only (OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.18-0.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional cEK RBC matching protocols were associated with lower odds of recipient alloimmunization. Given severe sequelae of alloimmunization in pregnancy, routine cEK matching for transfusion in people with pregnancy potential younger than age 50 years in the United States merits consideration.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42023411620 .</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"444-453"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standard Compared With Extended Red Blood Cell Antigen Matching for Prevention of Subsequent Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ronan P Sugrue, Jaxon Olsen, Marie Elise Abi Antoun, Lesley A Skalla, Jennifer Cate, Andra H James, Alexandra Stonehill, Virginia Watkins, Marilyn J Telen, Jerome J Federspiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and meta-analyze alloimmunization among recipients of red blood cells (RBCs) matched for ABO blood type and Rhesus D (ABO+D) antigen compared with those also matched for c, E, and Kell (cEK).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Four online databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched from March 28, 2023, to April 1, 2024. The search protocol was peer reviewed and published on PROSPERO ( CRD42023411620 ).</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Studies reporting alloimmunization as the primary outcome among recipients of RBCs matched for ABO+D or additional cEK matching were included. Patients transfused with unmatched RBCs or a mixture of matching regimens were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies and Tool for Risk of Bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to combine effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Ten studies met criteria. Risk of bias was low. Overall, 91,221 patients were transfused, of whom 40,220 (44.1%) received additional cEK-matched RBCs. The overall rate of alloimmunization was 6.2% (95% CI, 2.5-14.9%) for ABO+D-only matching and 1.9% (95% CI, 0.7-5.1%) when cEK was added. Time of follow-up antibody testing ranged from 6 to 18 months after transfusion. Additional cEK match was associated with significantly less alloimmunization compared with standard ABO+D match (odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% CI, 0.20-0.69). This association remained when chronically transfused patients were excluded (OR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.54-0.79) and for alloimmunization to c, E, or K antigens only (OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.18-0.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional cEK RBC matching protocols were associated with lower odds of recipient alloimmunization. Given severe sequelae of alloimmunization in pregnancy, routine cEK matching for transfusion in people with pregnancy potential younger than age 50 years in the United States merits consideration.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42023411620 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"444-453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499014/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005701\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Standard Compared With Extended Red Blood Cell Antigen Matching for Prevention of Subsequent Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn: A Systematic Review.
Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze alloimmunization among recipients of red blood cells (RBCs) matched for ABO blood type and Rhesus D (ABO+D) antigen compared with those also matched for c, E, and Kell (cEK).
Data sources: Four online databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched from March 28, 2023, to April 1, 2024. The search protocol was peer reviewed and published on PROSPERO ( CRD42023411620 ).
Methods of study selection: Studies reporting alloimmunization as the primary outcome among recipients of RBCs matched for ABO+D or additional cEK matching were included. Patients transfused with unmatched RBCs or a mixture of matching regimens were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies and Tool for Risk of Bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to combine effect estimates.
Tabulation, integration, and results: Ten studies met criteria. Risk of bias was low. Overall, 91,221 patients were transfused, of whom 40,220 (44.1%) received additional cEK-matched RBCs. The overall rate of alloimmunization was 6.2% (95% CI, 2.5-14.9%) for ABO+D-only matching and 1.9% (95% CI, 0.7-5.1%) when cEK was added. Time of follow-up antibody testing ranged from 6 to 18 months after transfusion. Additional cEK match was associated with significantly less alloimmunization compared with standard ABO+D match (odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% CI, 0.20-0.69). This association remained when chronically transfused patients were excluded (OR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.54-0.79) and for alloimmunization to c, E, or K antigens only (OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.18-0.47).
Conclusion: Additional cEK RBC matching protocols were associated with lower odds of recipient alloimmunization. Given severe sequelae of alloimmunization in pregnancy, routine cEK matching for transfusion in people with pregnancy potential younger than age 50 years in the United States merits consideration.
期刊介绍：
"Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics.
"Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
