有痴呆行为和心理症状的老年人服用抗精神病药物、认知增强剂与重大不良心血管/脑血管事件 (MACCE) 之间的关系。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01134-9
Haylie M DeMercy, Colleen A Brenner
{"title":"有痴呆行为和心理症状的老年人服用抗精神病药物、认知增强剂与重大不良心血管/脑血管事件 (MACCE) 之间的关系。","authors":"Haylie M DeMercy, Colleen A Brenner","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01134-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Antipsychotics and cognitive enhancers are often used to treat psychosis and behavioral disturbances in individuals with dementia; however, these drugs have been linked with various adverse events including both metabolic and cerebro/cardiovascular events. Thus, this study sought to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (MACCE) across four behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) treatment models by exploring potential associations between antipsychotics (APs), cognitive-enhancing medications, dosage, and earlier MACCE onset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were obtained from the Loma Linda University Medical Center database who were age ≥ 50 or older and who were diagnosed with dementia and BPSD symptoms. Treatment group and drug dosing were analyzed using Cox regression analyses to predict time until MACCE onset. Patient age at dementia diagnosis, sex, smoking status, race/ethnicity, and previous MACCE diagnoses were included as covariate variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study population consisted of 1162 individuals. Results indicated a significant effect of medication type on duration until MACCE, (p < 0.001), with the odds of experiencing a MACCE being 96.3% higher for individuals treated with both APs and cognitive enhancers (p < 0.001). There was also a significant effect of AP dosage on duration until MACCE (p < 0.001) and a significant effect of cognitive enhancer dosage on duration until a MACCE, (p < 0.001). The odds of experiencing a MACCE sooner were 238% higher for those on high doses of APs (p < 0.001) and 76% higher for individuals on high doses of cognitive enhancers (p < 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of APs at high doses was associated with the greatest risk of an adverse medical outcome in older adults with dementia with concurrent behavioral symptoms. Use of AP medications in this population should include close monitoring for cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Antipsychotics, Cognitive Enhancers, and Major Adverse Cardiovascular/Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) in Older Adults with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Haylie M DeMercy, Colleen A Brenner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40266-024-01134-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Antipsychotics and cognitive enhancers are often used to treat psychosis and behavioral disturbances in individuals with dementia; however, these drugs have been linked with various adverse events including both metabolic and cerebro/cardiovascular events. Thus, this study sought to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (MACCE) across four behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) treatment models by exploring potential associations between antipsychotics (APs), cognitive-enhancing medications, dosage, and earlier MACCE onset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were obtained from the Loma Linda University Medical Center database who were age ≥ 50 or older and who were diagnosed with dementia and BPSD symptoms. Treatment group and drug dosing were analyzed using Cox regression analyses to predict time until MACCE onset. Patient age at dementia diagnosis, sex, smoking status, race/ethnicity, and previous MACCE diagnoses were included as covariate variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study population consisted of 1162 individuals. Results indicated a significant effect of medication type on duration until MACCE, (p < 0.001), with the odds of experiencing a MACCE being 96.3% higher for individuals treated with both APs and cognitive enhancers (p < 0.001). There was also a significant effect of AP dosage on duration until MACCE (p < 0.001) and a significant effect of cognitive enhancer dosage on duration until a MACCE, (p < 0.001). The odds of experiencing a MACCE sooner were 238% higher for those on high doses of APs (p < 0.001) and 76% higher for individuals on high doses of cognitive enhancers (p < 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of APs at high doses was associated with the greatest risk of an adverse medical outcome in older adults with dementia with concurrent behavioral symptoms. Use of AP medications in this population should include close monitoring for cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480141/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01134-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01134-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:抗精神病药物和认知增强剂常用于治疗痴呆症患者的精神病和行为障碍;然而,这些药物与包括代谢和脑/心血管事件在内的各种不良事件有关。因此,本研究试图通过探讨抗精神病药物(APs)、认知增强药物、剂量与MACCE提前发生之间的潜在关联,估算四种痴呆行为和心理症状(BPSD)治疗模式下发生重大不良心血管/脑血管事件(MACCE)的风险:从洛马琳达大学医学中心数据库中获取年龄≥50岁或以上、被诊断患有痴呆症和BPSD症状的患者。采用 Cox 回归分析法对治疗组和药物剂量进行分析,以预测澳门巴黎人娱乐官网发病前的时间。患者确诊痴呆症时的年龄、性别、吸烟状况、种族/民族和既往澳门巴黎人娱乐官网诊断情况均被列为协变量:最终研究对象包括 1162 人。结果表明,药物类型对 MACCE 的持续时间有明显影响(p < 0.001),同时接受 APs 和认知增强剂治疗的患者发生 MACCE 的几率要高出 96.3%(p 结论:APs 和认知增强剂的使用剂量越大,MACCE 的持续时间越长:对于伴有行为症状的老年痴呆症患者来说,大剂量使用抗焦虑药物与不良医疗结果的最大风险相关。在这一人群中使用 AP 药物时,应密切监测心血管/脑血管事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Relationship Between Antipsychotics, Cognitive Enhancers, and Major Adverse Cardiovascular/Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) in Older Adults with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.

The Relationship Between Antipsychotics, Cognitive Enhancers, and Major Adverse Cardiovascular/Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) in Older Adults with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.

Background and objectives: Antipsychotics and cognitive enhancers are often used to treat psychosis and behavioral disturbances in individuals with dementia; however, these drugs have been linked with various adverse events including both metabolic and cerebro/cardiovascular events. Thus, this study sought to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (MACCE) across four behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) treatment models by exploring potential associations between antipsychotics (APs), cognitive-enhancing medications, dosage, and earlier MACCE onset.

Methods: Patients were obtained from the Loma Linda University Medical Center database who were age ≥ 50 or older and who were diagnosed with dementia and BPSD symptoms. Treatment group and drug dosing were analyzed using Cox regression analyses to predict time until MACCE onset. Patient age at dementia diagnosis, sex, smoking status, race/ethnicity, and previous MACCE diagnoses were included as covariate variables.

Results: The final study population consisted of 1162 individuals. Results indicated a significant effect of medication type on duration until MACCE, (p < 0.001), with the odds of experiencing a MACCE being 96.3% higher for individuals treated with both APs and cognitive enhancers (p < 0.001). There was also a significant effect of AP dosage on duration until MACCE (p < 0.001) and a significant effect of cognitive enhancer dosage on duration until a MACCE, (p < 0.001). The odds of experiencing a MACCE sooner were 238% higher for those on high doses of APs (p < 0.001) and 76% higher for individuals on high doses of cognitive enhancers (p < 0.010).

Conclusion: The use of APs at high doses was associated with the greatest risk of an adverse medical outcome in older adults with dementia with concurrent behavioral symptoms. Use of AP medications in this population should include close monitoring for cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信