开发马拉维儿童发育迟缓诊断预测模型:变量选择方法比较分析。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jonathan Mkungudza, Halima S Twabi, Samuel O M Manda
{"title":"开发马拉维儿童发育迟缓诊断预测模型:变量选择方法比较分析。","authors":"Jonathan Mkungudza, Halima S Twabi, Samuel O M Manda","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02283-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood stunting is a major indicator of child malnutrition and a focus area of Global Nutrition Targets for 2025 and Sustainable Development Goals. Risk factors for childhood stunting are well studied and well known and could be used in a risk prediction model for assessing whether a child is stunted or not. However, the selection of child stunting predictor variables is a critical step in the development and performance of any such prediction model. This paper compares the performance of child stunting diagnostic predictive models based on predictor variables selected using a set of variable selection methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Firstly, we conducted a subjective review of the literature to identify determinants of child stunting in Sub-Saharan Africa. Secondly, a multivariate logistic regression model of child stunting was fitted using the identified predictors on stunting data among children aged 0-59 months in the Malawi Demographic Health Survey (MDHS 2015-16) data. Thirdly, several reduced multivariable logistic regression models were fitted depending on the predictor variables selected using seven variable selection algorithms, namely backward, forward, stepwise, random forest, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and judgmental. Lastly, for each reduced model, a diagnostic predictive model for the childhood stunting risk score, defined as the child propensity score based on derived coefficients, was calculated for each child. The prediction risk models were assessed using discrimination measures, including area under-receiver operator curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified 68 predictor variables of child stunting, of which 27 were available in the MDHS 2016-16 data. The common risk factors selected by all the variable selection models include household wealth index, age of the child, household size, type of birth (singleton/multiple births), and birth weight. The best cut-off point on the child stunting risk prediction model was 0.37 based on risk factors determined by the judgmental variable selection method. The model's accuracy was estimated with an AUROC value of 64% (95% CI: 60%-67%) in the test data. For children residing in urban areas, the corresponding AUROC was AUC = 67% (95% CI: 58-76%), as opposed to those in rural areas, AUC = 63% (95% CI: 59-67%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The derived child stunting diagnostic prediction model could be useful as a first screening tool to identify children more likely to be stunted. The identified children could then receive necessary nutritional interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a diagnostic predictive model for determining child stunting in Malawi: a comparative analysis of variable selection approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Mkungudza, Halima S Twabi, Samuel O M Manda\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-024-02283-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood stunting is a major indicator of child malnutrition and a focus area of Global Nutrition Targets for 2025 and Sustainable Development Goals. Risk factors for childhood stunting are well studied and well known and could be used in a risk prediction model for assessing whether a child is stunted or not. However, the selection of child stunting predictor variables is a critical step in the development and performance of any such prediction model. This paper compares the performance of child stunting diagnostic predictive models based on predictor variables selected using a set of variable selection methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Firstly, we conducted a subjective review of the literature to identify determinants of child stunting in Sub-Saharan Africa. Secondly, a multivariate logistic regression model of child stunting was fitted using the identified predictors on stunting data among children aged 0-59 months in the Malawi Demographic Health Survey (MDHS 2015-16) data. Thirdly, several reduced multivariable logistic regression models were fitted depending on the predictor variables selected using seven variable selection algorithms, namely backward, forward, stepwise, random forest, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and judgmental. Lastly, for each reduced model, a diagnostic predictive model for the childhood stunting risk score, defined as the child propensity score based on derived coefficients, was calculated for each child. The prediction risk models were assessed using discrimination measures, including area under-receiver operator curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified 68 predictor variables of child stunting, of which 27 were available in the MDHS 2016-16 data. The common risk factors selected by all the variable selection models include household wealth index, age of the child, household size, type of birth (singleton/multiple births), and birth weight. The best cut-off point on the child stunting risk prediction model was 0.37 based on risk factors determined by the judgmental variable selection method. The model's accuracy was estimated with an AUROC value of 64% (95% CI: 60%-67%) in the test data. For children residing in urban areas, the corresponding AUROC was AUC = 67% (95% CI: 58-76%), as opposed to those in rural areas, AUC = 63% (95% CI: 59-67%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The derived child stunting diagnostic prediction model could be useful as a first screening tool to identify children more likely to be stunted. The identified children could then receive necessary nutritional interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308741/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02283-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02283-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童发育迟缓是儿童营养不良的一个主要指标,也是 2025 年全球营养目标和可持续发展目标的一个重点领域。儿童发育迟缓的风险因素已被充分研究和熟知,可用于风险预测模型,以评估儿童是否发育迟缓。然而,儿童发育迟缓预测变量的选择是任何此类预测模型的开发和性能的关键步骤。本文比较了基于预测变量的儿童发育迟缓诊断预测模型的性能,预测变量的选择采用了一系列变量选择方法:首先,我们对文献进行了主观回顾,以确定撒哈拉以南非洲儿童发育迟缓的决定因素。其次,根据马拉维人口健康调查(MDHS 2015-16)数据中 0-59 个月儿童发育迟缓的数据,利用确定的预测因素拟合出儿童发育迟缓的多元逻辑回归模型。第三,根据所选预测变量的不同,使用七种变量选择算法(即后向、前向、逐步、随机森林、最小绝对缩减和选择操作器(LASSO)以及判断),拟合了多个简化的多变量逻辑回归模型。最后,针对每个缩小的模型,计算出每个儿童的儿童发育迟缓风险得分诊断预测模型,该模型定义为基于推导系数的儿童倾向得分。预测风险模型采用判别指标进行评估,包括接收者运算曲线下面积(AUROC)、灵敏度和特异性:审查确定了 68 个儿童发育迟缓的预测变量,其中 27 个可在 2016-16 年千年发展目标人口与健康调查数据中找到。所有变量选择模型选择的共同风险因素包括家庭财富指数、儿童年龄、家庭规模、出生类型(单胎/多胎)和出生体重。根据判断变量选择法确定的风险因素,儿童发育迟缓风险预测模型的最佳临界点为 0.37。据估计,该模型在测试数据中的准确率为 64%(95% CI:60%-67%)。城市儿童的AUROC为67%(95% CI:58-76%),而农村儿童的AUROC为63%(95% CI:59-67%):得出的儿童发育迟缓诊断预测模型可作为第一筛查工具,用于识别更有可能发育迟缓的儿童。被识别的儿童随后可接受必要的营养干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a diagnostic predictive model for determining child stunting in Malawi: a comparative analysis of variable selection approaches.

Background: Childhood stunting is a major indicator of child malnutrition and a focus area of Global Nutrition Targets for 2025 and Sustainable Development Goals. Risk factors for childhood stunting are well studied and well known and could be used in a risk prediction model for assessing whether a child is stunted or not. However, the selection of child stunting predictor variables is a critical step in the development and performance of any such prediction model. This paper compares the performance of child stunting diagnostic predictive models based on predictor variables selected using a set of variable selection methods.

Methods: Firstly, we conducted a subjective review of the literature to identify determinants of child stunting in Sub-Saharan Africa. Secondly, a multivariate logistic regression model of child stunting was fitted using the identified predictors on stunting data among children aged 0-59 months in the Malawi Demographic Health Survey (MDHS 2015-16) data. Thirdly, several reduced multivariable logistic regression models were fitted depending on the predictor variables selected using seven variable selection algorithms, namely backward, forward, stepwise, random forest, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and judgmental. Lastly, for each reduced model, a diagnostic predictive model for the childhood stunting risk score, defined as the child propensity score based on derived coefficients, was calculated for each child. The prediction risk models were assessed using discrimination measures, including area under-receiver operator curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity.

Results: The review identified 68 predictor variables of child stunting, of which 27 were available in the MDHS 2016-16 data. The common risk factors selected by all the variable selection models include household wealth index, age of the child, household size, type of birth (singleton/multiple births), and birth weight. The best cut-off point on the child stunting risk prediction model was 0.37 based on risk factors determined by the judgmental variable selection method. The model's accuracy was estimated with an AUROC value of 64% (95% CI: 60%-67%) in the test data. For children residing in urban areas, the corresponding AUROC was AUC = 67% (95% CI: 58-76%), as opposed to those in rural areas, AUC = 63% (95% CI: 59-67%).

Conclusion: The derived child stunting diagnostic prediction model could be useful as a first screening tool to identify children more likely to be stunted. The identified children could then receive necessary nutritional interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信