对有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄进行颈动脉内膜剥脱术后的长期死亡率和发病率。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Philippe Tresson, Stéphane Lo, Emeraude Rivoire, Tae-Hee Cho, Antoine Millon, Anne Long
{"title":"对有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄进行颈动脉内膜剥脱术后的长期死亡率和发病率。","authors":"Philippe Tresson, Stéphane Lo, Emeraude Rivoire, Tae-Hee Cho, Antoine Millon, Anne Long","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether the occurrence of ischemic stroke due to carotid stenosis is a marker of the severity of atherosclerotic disease and of an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and of all-cause mortality, after carotid endarterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) from June 2015 to august 2016 were included. Patients were classified into two groups, namely symptomatic and asymptomatic. Neurological event, myocardial infarction and death during early follow-up were monitored. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major limb events (MALE), and all-cause mortality were compared for patients with a CEA for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis versus those with a symptomatic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 190 patients included, 86 (51%) had a CEA for an asymptomatic stenosis and 84 (49%) for a symptomatic stenosis. During the first 30 days, the rate of all-cause death or ischemic stroke was similar in both groups (1%, p=0.986). After 30 days, there were a total of 35 MACE (21.3%) and 15 MALE (9.1%) during mean follow-up of 53 (22.6) months. Overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was 30.4%, and did not differ between groups (p=0.565). New ischemic stroke occurred in 11 patients (9.1%) and was significantly more frequent in the asymptomatic group (9 (14.8%) vs 2 (3.6%) in the symptomatic group, (OR: 4.96; CI 95% [1.04-23.77]; p = 0.013)). Overall all-cause mortality was 24% in both groups (p=0.93) CONCLUSION: The occurrence of ischemic stroke of carotid origin prior to revascularization does not appear to be associated with an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality or all-cause mortality after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term mortality and morbidity after carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Tresson, Stéphane Lo, Emeraude Rivoire, Tae-Hee Cho, Antoine Millon, Anne Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether the occurrence of ischemic stroke due to carotid stenosis is a marker of the severity of atherosclerotic disease and of an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and of all-cause mortality, after carotid endarterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) from June 2015 to august 2016 were included. Patients were classified into two groups, namely symptomatic and asymptomatic. Neurological event, myocardial infarction and death during early follow-up were monitored. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major limb events (MALE), and all-cause mortality were compared for patients with a CEA for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis versus those with a symptomatic stenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 190 patients included, 86 (51%) had a CEA for an asymptomatic stenosis and 84 (49%) for a symptomatic stenosis. During the first 30 days, the rate of all-cause death or ischemic stroke was similar in both groups (1%, p=0.986). After 30 days, there were a total of 35 MACE (21.3%) and 15 MALE (9.1%) during mean follow-up of 53 (22.6) months. Overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was 30.4%, and did not differ between groups (p=0.565). New ischemic stroke occurred in 11 patients (9.1%) and was significantly more frequent in the asymptomatic group (9 (14.8%) vs 2 (3.6%) in the symptomatic group, (OR: 4.96; CI 95% [1.04-23.77]; p = 0.013)). Overall all-cause mortality was 24% in both groups (p=0.93) CONCLUSION: The occurrence of ischemic stroke of carotid origin prior to revascularization does not appear to be associated with an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality or all-cause mortality after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的研究颈动脉狭窄导致的缺血性中风的发生率是否是动脉粥样硬化疾病严重程度的标志,以及颈动脉内膜切除术后心血管发病率和死亡率以及全因死亡率超额风险的标志:纳入2015年6月至2016年8月期间接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的患者。患者分为无症状和无症状两组。对早期随访期间的神经事件、心肌梗死和死亡进行了监测。比较了无症状颈动脉狭窄患者与有症状颈动脉狭窄患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、主要肢体事件(MALE)和全因死亡率:在纳入的 190 名患者中,86 人(51%)因无症状颈动脉狭窄而接受 CEA,84 人(49%)因有症状颈动脉狭窄而接受 CEA。在头 30 天内,两组患者的全因死亡或缺血性中风发生率相似(1%,P=0.986)。30 天后,在平均 53(22.6)个月的随访期间,共有 35 例 MACE(21.3%)和 15 例 MALE(9.1%)。总体心血管发病率和死亡率为 30.4%,组间无差异(P=0.565)。有 11 名患者(9.1%)发生了新的缺血性中风,无症状组的发生率明显更高(9 例(14.8%)对无症状组的 2 例(3.6%),(OR:4.96;CI 95% [1.04-23.77];P = 0.013))。两组的全因死亡率均为 24% (p=0.93) 结论:血管再通术前发生颈动脉缺血性卒中似乎与术后心血管发病率或死亡率或全因死亡率过高的风险无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term mortality and morbidity after carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Objectives: To investigate whether the occurrence of ischemic stroke due to carotid stenosis is a marker of the severity of atherosclerotic disease and of an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and of all-cause mortality, after carotid endarterectomy.

Methods: Patients who had undergone a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) from June 2015 to august 2016 were included. Patients were classified into two groups, namely symptomatic and asymptomatic. Neurological event, myocardial infarction and death during early follow-up were monitored. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major limb events (MALE), and all-cause mortality were compared for patients with a CEA for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis versus those with a symptomatic stenosis.

Results: Among the 190 patients included, 86 (51%) had a CEA for an asymptomatic stenosis and 84 (49%) for a symptomatic stenosis. During the first 30 days, the rate of all-cause death or ischemic stroke was similar in both groups (1%, p=0.986). After 30 days, there were a total of 35 MACE (21.3%) and 15 MALE (9.1%) during mean follow-up of 53 (22.6) months. Overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was 30.4%, and did not differ between groups (p=0.565). New ischemic stroke occurred in 11 patients (9.1%) and was significantly more frequent in the asymptomatic group (9 (14.8%) vs 2 (3.6%) in the symptomatic group, (OR: 4.96; CI 95% [1.04-23.77]; p = 0.013)). Overall all-cause mortality was 24% in both groups (p=0.93) CONCLUSION: The occurrence of ischemic stroke of carotid origin prior to revascularization does not appear to be associated with an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality or all-cause mortality after surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信