Jiří Berger, Jan Bruthans, Adam Vojtěch, Jiří Kofránek
{"title":"利用流程模型确定捷克共和国电子处方的立法框架。","authors":"Jiří Berger, Jan Bruthans, Adam Vojtěch, Jiří Kofránek","doi":"10.1177/14604582241270902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defining legislation for electronic prescription systems (EPS) is inherently challenging due to conflicting interests and requirements. The study aimed to develop a comprehensive EPS within the Czech healthcare framework, integrating legislative, process, and technical aspects to ensure security, user acceptability, and compliance with health regulations. A process modeling tool based on hierarchical state machines was employed to create a detailed process architecture for the EPS. Key participants, scenarios, and state transitions were identified and incorporated into a process model using the Craft.CASE based on the BORM methodology. The final process architecture model facilitated interdisciplinary communication and consensus-building among stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, IT specialists, and legislators. The model served as a foundation for the legislative framework and was included in the explanatory memorandum for the draft amendment to the Pharmaceuticals Act. The use of hierarchical state machines and process modeling tools in developing healthcare legislation effectively reduced misunderstandings and ensured precise implementation. This method can be applied to other complex legislative and system design projects, enhancing stakeholder communication and project success.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 3","pages":"14604582241270902"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using process model to define the legislative framework of electronic prescription in the Czech Republic.\",\"authors\":\"Jiří Berger, Jan Bruthans, Adam Vojtěch, Jiří Kofránek\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582241270902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Defining legislation for electronic prescription systems (EPS) is inherently challenging due to conflicting interests and requirements. The study aimed to develop a comprehensive EPS within the Czech healthcare framework, integrating legislative, process, and technical aspects to ensure security, user acceptability, and compliance with health regulations. A process modeling tool based on hierarchical state machines was employed to create a detailed process architecture for the EPS. Key participants, scenarios, and state transitions were identified and incorporated into a process model using the Craft.CASE based on the BORM methodology. The final process architecture model facilitated interdisciplinary communication and consensus-building among stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, IT specialists, and legislators. The model served as a foundation for the legislative framework and was included in the explanatory memorandum for the draft amendment to the Pharmaceuticals Act. The use of hierarchical state machines and process modeling tools in developing healthcare legislation effectively reduced misunderstandings and ensured precise implementation. This method can be applied to other complex legislative and system design projects, enhancing stakeholder communication and project success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"14604582241270902\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241270902\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241270902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using process model to define the legislative framework of electronic prescription in the Czech Republic.
Defining legislation for electronic prescription systems (EPS) is inherently challenging due to conflicting interests and requirements. The study aimed to develop a comprehensive EPS within the Czech healthcare framework, integrating legislative, process, and technical aspects to ensure security, user acceptability, and compliance with health regulations. A process modeling tool based on hierarchical state machines was employed to create a detailed process architecture for the EPS. Key participants, scenarios, and state transitions were identified and incorporated into a process model using the Craft.CASE based on the BORM methodology. The final process architecture model facilitated interdisciplinary communication and consensus-building among stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, IT specialists, and legislators. The model served as a foundation for the legislative framework and was included in the explanatory memorandum for the draft amendment to the Pharmaceuticals Act. The use of hierarchical state machines and process modeling tools in developing healthcare legislation effectively reduced misunderstandings and ensured precise implementation. This method can be applied to other complex legislative and system design projects, enhancing stakeholder communication and project success.
期刊介绍:
Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.