性冲突期间的需求-撤回沟通模式会预测夫妻关系满意度、性满意度和性困扰吗?一项观察性和前瞻性研究。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Natalie O Rosen, Justin P Dubé, Myriam Bosisio, Sophie Bergeron
{"title":"性冲突期间的需求-撤回沟通模式会预测夫妻关系满意度、性满意度和性困扰吗?一项观察性和前瞻性研究。","authors":"Natalie O Rosen, Justin P Dubé, Myriam Bosisio, Sophie Bergeron","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2024.2386997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual conflict is common, yet it is one of the most challenging topics for couples because it provokes more negative emotions relative to other conflicts. Such challenges might prompt couples to rely on less adaptive sexual communication styles. Communication patterns during sexual conflict - such as demand-withdrawal - have received little attention, and studies that do exist relied on self-report measures. Demand-withdrawal communication refers to when one partner exerts pressure to talk about a problem while the other withdraws, and is associated with poorer psychological and relationship well-being. In an observational dyadic study, we examined associations between demand-withdrawal patterns during a sexual conflict and sexual and relationship outcomes concurrently and over time. Couples (<i>N</i> = 151, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 31.92, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 9.07) in long-term relationships completed measures of relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and sexual distress at baseline (T1) and 12 months later (T2). One week after T1, they engaged in an in-lab discussion of an important sexual conflict, coded by trained observers for degree of demand-withdrawal. Individuals in a couple who were observed to display higher demand-withdrawal reported lower relationship and sexual satisfaction and higher sexual distress at T1, as well as lower relationship satisfaction at T2. Effects were not moderated by gender. Findings demonstrate the relevance of demand-withdrawal patterns during sexual conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Demand-Withdrawal Communication Patterns During Sexual Conflict Predict Couples' Relationship Satisfaction, Sexual Satisfaction, and Sexual Distress? An Observational and Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie O Rosen, Justin P Dubé, Myriam Bosisio, Sophie Bergeron\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00224499.2024.2386997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sexual conflict is common, yet it is one of the most challenging topics for couples because it provokes more negative emotions relative to other conflicts. Such challenges might prompt couples to rely on less adaptive sexual communication styles. Communication patterns during sexual conflict - such as demand-withdrawal - have received little attention, and studies that do exist relied on self-report measures. Demand-withdrawal communication refers to when one partner exerts pressure to talk about a problem while the other withdraws, and is associated with poorer psychological and relationship well-being. In an observational dyadic study, we examined associations between demand-withdrawal patterns during a sexual conflict and sexual and relationship outcomes concurrently and over time. Couples (<i>N</i> = 151, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 31.92, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 9.07) in long-term relationships completed measures of relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and sexual distress at baseline (T1) and 12 months later (T2). One week after T1, they engaged in an in-lab discussion of an important sexual conflict, coded by trained observers for degree of demand-withdrawal. Individuals in a couple who were observed to display higher demand-withdrawal reported lower relationship and sexual satisfaction and higher sexual distress at T1, as well as lower relationship satisfaction at T2. Effects were not moderated by gender. Findings demonstrate the relevance of demand-withdrawal patterns during sexual conflict.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sex Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sex Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2386997\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2386997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性冲突很常见,但却是夫妻间最具挑战性的话题之一,因为相对于其他冲突,性冲突会引发更多的负面情绪。这种挑战可能会促使夫妻依赖于适应性较差的性交流方式。性冲突中的沟通模式--如要求--撤回--很少受到关注,现有的研究也依赖于自我报告测量。要求-退出式沟通是指一方施加压力要求另一方谈论问题,而另一方则退出,这种沟通方式与较差的心理和关系幸福感有关。在一项观察性二元对立研究中,我们考察了性冲突中的要求-退缩模式与性和关系结果之间的关联。长期关系中的夫妻(人数 = 151,平均年龄 = 31.92,平均年龄 = 9.07)在基线(T1)和 12 个月后(T2)完成了关系满意度、性满意度和性困扰的测量。T1结束一周后,他们在实验室内讨论了一次重要的性冲突,由训练有素的观察者对需求-撤回程度进行编码。被观察到需求撤回程度较高的情侣在 T1 阶段的关系满意度和性满意度较低,性困扰较高,在 T2 阶段的关系满意度也较低。这种影响不受性别影响。研究结果表明,在性冲突期间,需求-撤回模式具有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Demand-Withdrawal Communication Patterns During Sexual Conflict Predict Couples' Relationship Satisfaction, Sexual Satisfaction, and Sexual Distress? An Observational and Prospective Study.

Sexual conflict is common, yet it is one of the most challenging topics for couples because it provokes more negative emotions relative to other conflicts. Such challenges might prompt couples to rely on less adaptive sexual communication styles. Communication patterns during sexual conflict - such as demand-withdrawal - have received little attention, and studies that do exist relied on self-report measures. Demand-withdrawal communication refers to when one partner exerts pressure to talk about a problem while the other withdraws, and is associated with poorer psychological and relationship well-being. In an observational dyadic study, we examined associations between demand-withdrawal patterns during a sexual conflict and sexual and relationship outcomes concurrently and over time. Couples (N = 151, Mage = 31.92, SDage = 9.07) in long-term relationships completed measures of relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and sexual distress at baseline (T1) and 12 months later (T2). One week after T1, they engaged in an in-lab discussion of an important sexual conflict, coded by trained observers for degree of demand-withdrawal. Individuals in a couple who were observed to display higher demand-withdrawal reported lower relationship and sexual satisfaction and higher sexual distress at T1, as well as lower relationship satisfaction at T2. Effects were not moderated by gender. Findings demonstrate the relevance of demand-withdrawal patterns during sexual conflict.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信