{"title":"用于诊断肺部和肺部外结核病的真菌检测评估：系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Shima Mahmoudi, Amir Hossein Sadegh Moghaddasi","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2389876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health concern, necessitating accurate and timely diagnostic methods. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Truenat assays for both pulmonary TB (PTB) and extrapulmonary TB (EPTB).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies comparing Truenat assays to <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> confirmation methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing Truenat MTB assay with the Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI: 79-91%) and 86% (95% CI: 82-90%), respectively. For Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture comparison, pooled sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 82-92%) with a specificity of 79% (95% CI: 57-92%). Compared to smear microscopy, Truenat assays displayed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 92% (95% CI: 78-98%) and 86% (95% CI: 64-95%). In comparison to Xpert MTB/RIF, Truenat assays exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 80-97%) and a pooled specificity of 92% (95% CI: 56-99%) for PTB detection, and a pooled sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 81-98%) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI: 32-96%) for the diagnosis of EPTB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the potential of Truenat assays as valuable tools for diagnosing both PTB and EPTB.</p><p><strong>Prospero id: </strong>CRD42024526686.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"659-668"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of truenat assays for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shima Mahmoudi, Amir Hossein Sadegh Moghaddasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14787210.2024.2389876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health concern, necessitating accurate and timely diagnostic methods. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Truenat assays for both pulmonary TB (PTB) and extrapulmonary TB (EPTB).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies comparing Truenat assays to <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> confirmation methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing Truenat MTB assay with the Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI: 79-91%) and 86% (95% CI: 82-90%), respectively. For Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture comparison, pooled sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 82-92%) with a specificity of 79% (95% CI: 57-92%). Compared to smear microscopy, Truenat assays displayed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 92% (95% CI: 78-98%) and 86% (95% CI: 64-95%). In comparison to Xpert MTB/RIF, Truenat assays exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 80-97%) and a pooled specificity of 92% (95% CI: 56-99%) for PTB detection, and a pooled sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 81-98%) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI: 32-96%) for the diagnosis of EPTB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the potential of Truenat assays as valuable tools for diagnosing both PTB and EPTB.</p><p><strong>Prospero id: </strong>CRD42024526686.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"659-668\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2024.2389876\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2024.2389876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of truenat assays for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health concern, necessitating accurate and timely diagnostic methods. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Truenat assays for both pulmonary TB (PTB) and extrapulmonary TB (EPTB).
Method: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies comparing Truenat assays to Mycobacterium tuberculosis confirmation methods.
Results: Comparing Truenat MTB assay with the Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI: 79-91%) and 86% (95% CI: 82-90%), respectively. For Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture comparison, pooled sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 82-92%) with a specificity of 79% (95% CI: 57-92%). Compared to smear microscopy, Truenat assays displayed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 92% (95% CI: 78-98%) and 86% (95% CI: 64-95%). In comparison to Xpert MTB/RIF, Truenat assays exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 80-97%) and a pooled specificity of 92% (95% CI: 56-99%) for PTB detection, and a pooled sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 81-98%) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI: 32-96%) for the diagnosis of EPTB.
Conclusion: This study underscores the potential of Truenat assays as valuable tools for diagnosing both PTB and EPTB.
期刊介绍：
Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
