Yusuf Ilhan, Gokhan Ucar, Mehmet Nuri Baser, Halil Goksel Guzel, Safa Can Efil, Bilgin Demir, Duygu Ercan Uzundal, Tuba Karacelik, Nadiye Sever, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Hayati Arvas, Ibrahim Karadag, Ahmet Kadioglu, Ömer Burak Ekinci, Cengiz Karacin, Zuhat Urakci, Osman Kostek, Melek Karakurt Eryilmaz, Ozan Yazici, Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur, Banu Ozturk, Dogan Uncu, Yakup Ergun
{"title":"对接受化疗免疫疗法的广泛期小细胞肺癌患者进行 G-CSF 预防治疗的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Yusuf Ilhan, Gokhan Ucar, Mehmet Nuri Baser, Halil Goksel Guzel, Safa Can Efil, Bilgin Demir, Duygu Ercan Uzundal, Tuba Karacelik, Nadiye Sever, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Hayati Arvas, Ibrahim Karadag, Ahmet Kadioglu, Ömer Burak Ekinci, Cengiz Karacin, Zuhat Urakci, Osman Kostek, Melek Karakurt Eryilmaz, Ozan Yazici, Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur, Banu Ozturk, Dogan Uncu, Yakup Ergun","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Ilhan, Gokhan Ucar, Mehmet Nuri Baser, Halil Goksel Guzel, Safa Can Efil, Bilgin Demir, Duygu Ercan Uzundal, Tuba Karacelik, Nadiye Sever, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Hayati Arvas, Ibrahim Karadag, Ahmet Kadioglu, Ömer Burak Ekinci, Cengiz Karacin, Zuhat Urakci, Osman Kostek, Melek Karakurt Eryilmaz, Ozan Yazici, Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur, Banu Ozturk, Dogan Uncu, Yakup Ergun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy.
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).
Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.
Results: Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively (p = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively, p = 0.12).
Conclusion: G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.