使用先进的混合闭环系统简化成人膳食管理。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Noga Minsky, Roy Shalit, Andrea Benedetti, Maya Laron-Hirsh, Ohad Cohen, Natalie Kurtz, Anirban Roy, Benyamin Grosman, Amir Tirosh
{"title":"使用先进的混合闭环系统简化成人膳食管理。","authors":"Noga Minsky, Roy Shalit, Andrea Benedetti, Maya Laron-Hirsh, Ohad Cohen, Natalie Kurtz, Anirban Roy, Benyamin Grosman, Amir Tirosh","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) algorithm combines automated basal rates and corrections yet requires meal announcement for optimal performance, which poses a challenge for some. We aimed to compare glucose control in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using the MiniMed<sup>TM</sup> 780G AHCL system, utilizing simplified meal announcement versus precise carbohydrate (CHO) counting. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a study involving 14 adults with T1D, we evaluated glycemic control during a 13-week \"precise phase,\" followed by two 3- to 4-week simplified meal announcement phases: \"fixed one-step\" (preset of one personalized fixed CHO amount) and \"multistep\" (entry of multiples of one, two, or three of these presets depending on meal size estimate). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age was 45.7 ± 12.4, and 10 participants were male (71%). Mean baseline HbA1c was 6.8% ± 1.2% and time in range (TIR) was 67.5% ± 16.7%. Comparing the fixed one-step to the precise study phase, TIR was similar (75.4 ± 13% vs. 77.7 ± 9%, <i>P</i> = 0.12), and glucose management indicator (GMI) was slightly higher (6.8 ± 0.4 vs. 6.6 ± 0, <i>P</i> = 0.01). Furthermore, there was less level 1 and 2 hypoglycemia (1.6 ± 1% vs. 2.8 ± 2%, <i>P</i> = 0.03 and 0.3 ± 5% vs. 0.65 ± 1%, <i>P</i> = 0.08) but slightly more level 1 and 2 hyperglycemia (17.1 ± 8% vs. 15.0 ± 7%, <i>P</i> = 0.05 and 5.5 ± 5% vs. 3.6 ± 3%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). When comparing the multistep with the precise phase, GMI was identical (6.6%) and TIR superior (80.5 ± 10% vs. 77.7 ± 9%, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Additionally, there was less level 1 hypoglycemia (1.9 ± 1% vs. 2.8 ± 2%, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and a trend for less level 2 hypoglycemia (0.4 ± 0.7% vs. 0.65 ± 1%, <i>P</i> = 0.08). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A simplified meal announcement strategy for adults using the MiniMed 780G system, relying on three increments of a fixed one-step CHO amount, may offer a way to improve glycemic control and ease self-care. For patients with more limitations, using one fixed one-step CHO amount could be a safe alternative to meeting most consensus glycemic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplified Meal Management in Adults Using an Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System.\",\"authors\":\"Noga Minsky, Roy Shalit, Andrea Benedetti, Maya Laron-Hirsh, Ohad Cohen, Natalie Kurtz, Anirban Roy, Benyamin Grosman, Amir Tirosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2024.0224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) algorithm combines automated basal rates and corrections yet requires meal announcement for optimal performance, which poses a challenge for some. We aimed to compare glucose control in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using the MiniMed<sup>TM</sup> 780G AHCL system, utilizing simplified meal announcement versus precise carbohydrate (CHO) counting. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a study involving 14 adults with T1D, we evaluated glycemic control during a 13-week \\\"precise phase,\\\" followed by two 3- to 4-week simplified meal announcement phases: \\\"fixed one-step\\\" (preset of one personalized fixed CHO amount) and \\\"multistep\\\" (entry of multiples of one, two, or three of these presets depending on meal size estimate). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age was 45.7 ± 12.4, and 10 participants were male (71%). Mean baseline HbA1c was 6.8% ± 1.2% and time in range (TIR) was 67.5% ± 16.7%. Comparing the fixed one-step to the precise study phase, TIR was similar (75.4 ± 13% vs. 77.7 ± 9%, <i>P</i> = 0.12), and glucose management indicator (GMI) was slightly higher (6.8 ± 0.4 vs. 6.6 ± 0, <i>P</i> = 0.01). Furthermore, there was less level 1 and 2 hypoglycemia (1.6 ± 1% vs. 2.8 ± 2%, <i>P</i> = 0.03 and 0.3 ± 5% vs. 0.65 ± 1%, <i>P</i> = 0.08) but slightly more level 1 and 2 hyperglycemia (17.1 ± 8% vs. 15.0 ± 7%, <i>P</i> = 0.05 and 5.5 ± 5% vs. 3.6 ± 3%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). When comparing the multistep with the precise phase, GMI was identical (6.6%) and TIR superior (80.5 ± 10% vs. 77.7 ± 9%, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Additionally, there was less level 1 hypoglycemia (1.9 ± 1% vs. 2.8 ± 2%, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and a trend for less level 2 hypoglycemia (0.4 ± 0.7% vs. 0.65 ± 1%, <i>P</i> = 0.08). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A simplified meal announcement strategy for adults using the MiniMed 780G system, relying on three increments of a fixed one-step CHO amount, may offer a way to improve glycemic control and ease self-care. For patients with more limitations, using one fixed one-step CHO amount could be a safe alternative to meeting most consensus glycemic targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0224\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 先进的混合闭环(AHCL)算法结合了自动基础率和校正,但需要进餐申报才能达到最佳性能,这对某些人来说是个挑战。我们的目的是比较使用 MiniMedTM 780G AHCL 系统的 T1D 成人患者的血糖控制情况。方法 在一项涉及 14 名 T1D 成人患者的研究中,我们评估了为期 13 周的 "精确阶段 "的血糖控制情况,随后是两个为期 3-4 周的简化报餐阶段:"通用"(预设一个个性化的固定碳水化合物量)和 "递增"(根据膳食量估算,输入一个、两个或三个预设碳水化合物量的倍数)。结果 平均年龄(45.7±12.4)岁,10 名参与者为男性(71%)。平均基线 HbA1c 为 6.8%±1.2%,TIR 为 67.5%±16.7%。将普遍研究阶段与精确研究阶段相比,TIR 相似(75.4±13% vs. 77.7±9%,P=0.12),GMI 略高(6.8±0.4 vs. 6.6±0,P=0.01)。此外,1 级和 2 级低血糖较少(1.6±1% vs. 2.8±2%,p=0.03 和 0.3±5% vs. 0.65±1%,p=0.08),但 1 级和 2 级高血糖略多(17.1±8% vs. 15.0±7%,p=0.05 和 5.5±5% vs. 3.6±3%,p=0.04)。将增量阶段与精确阶段相比,GMI 相同(6.6%),TIR 更优(80.5±10% vs. 77.7±9%,P=0.02)。此外,1 级低血糖较少(1.9±1% vs. 2.8±2%,p=0.01),2 级低血糖有减少趋势(0.4±0.7% vs. 0.65±1%,p=0.08)。结论 在成人中使用 MiniMedTM780G 系统的简化膳食公布策略,依靠三个递增的通用 CHO 量,可以提供一种改善血糖控制和方便自我护理的方法。对于有更多限制的患者来说,使用一个通用 CHO 量可能是一种安全的替代方法,可以达到大多数共识的血糖目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplified Meal Management in Adults Using an Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System.

Background: The advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) algorithm combines automated basal rates and corrections yet requires meal announcement for optimal performance, which poses a challenge for some. We aimed to compare glucose control in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using the MiniMedTM 780G AHCL system, utilizing simplified meal announcement versus precise carbohydrate (CHO) counting. Methods: In a study involving 14 adults with T1D, we evaluated glycemic control during a 13-week "precise phase," followed by two 3- to 4-week simplified meal announcement phases: "fixed one-step" (preset of one personalized fixed CHO amount) and "multistep" (entry of multiples of one, two, or three of these presets depending on meal size estimate). Results: The mean age was 45.7 ± 12.4, and 10 participants were male (71%). Mean baseline HbA1c was 6.8% ± 1.2% and time in range (TIR) was 67.5% ± 16.7%. Comparing the fixed one-step to the precise study phase, TIR was similar (75.4 ± 13% vs. 77.7 ± 9%, P = 0.12), and glucose management indicator (GMI) was slightly higher (6.8 ± 0.4 vs. 6.6 ± 0, P = 0.01). Furthermore, there was less level 1 and 2 hypoglycemia (1.6 ± 1% vs. 2.8 ± 2%, P = 0.03 and 0.3 ± 5% vs. 0.65 ± 1%, P = 0.08) but slightly more level 1 and 2 hyperglycemia (17.1 ± 8% vs. 15.0 ± 7%, P = 0.05 and 5.5 ± 5% vs. 3.6 ± 3%, P = 0.04). When comparing the multistep with the precise phase, GMI was identical (6.6%) and TIR superior (80.5 ± 10% vs. 77.7 ± 9%, P = 0.02). Additionally, there was less level 1 hypoglycemia (1.9 ± 1% vs. 2.8 ± 2%, P = 0.01) and a trend for less level 2 hypoglycemia (0.4 ± 0.7% vs. 0.65 ± 1%, P = 0.08). Conclusions: A simplified meal announcement strategy for adults using the MiniMed 780G system, relying on three increments of a fixed one-step CHO amount, may offer a way to improve glycemic control and ease self-care. For patients with more limitations, using one fixed one-step CHO amount could be a safe alternative to meeting most consensus glycemic targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信