对复发性腰椎间盘突出症患者进行椎间盘内髁状突注射治疗的效果。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.31616/asj.2024.0042
Noritaka Suzuki, Yawara Eguchi, Takashi Hirai, Takuya Takahashi, Yohei Takahashi, Kota Watanabe, Tomohiro Banno, Kyohei Sakaki, Satoshi Maki, Yuuichi Takano, Yuki Taniguchi, Yasuchika Aoki, Takamitsu Konishi, Yutaka Hiraizumi, Masatsune Yamagata, Akihiro Hirakawa, Seiji Ohtori
{"title":"对复发性腰椎间盘突出症患者进行椎间盘内髁状突注射治疗的效果。","authors":"Noritaka Suzuki, Yawara Eguchi, Takashi Hirai, Takuya Takahashi, Yohei Takahashi, Kota Watanabe, Tomohiro Banno, Kyohei Sakaki, Satoshi Maki, Yuuichi Takano, Yuki Taniguchi, Yasuchika Aoki, Takamitsu Konishi, Yutaka Hiraizumi, Masatsune Yamagata, Akihiro Hirakawa, Seiji Ohtori","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare data from patients who received intradiscal condoliase (chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase) injection for primary lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and recurrent LDH.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Chemonucleolysis with condoliase for LDH is a treatment with relatively good results and a high safety profile; however, few studies have reported recurrence after LDH surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study participants were 249 patients who underwent intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH at nine participating institutions, including 241 patients with initial LDH (group C) and eight with recurrent LDH (group R). Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, disease duration, intervertebral LDH level, smoking history, and diabetes history were evaluated. Low back pain/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical symptoms before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low back pain NRS scores (before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment, respectively) in group C (4.9 → 2.6 → 1.8) showed significant improvement until 1 year after treatment. Although a tendency for improvement was observed in group R (3.5 → 2.8 → 2.2), no significant difference was noted. Groups C (6.6 → 2.4 → 1.4) and R (7.0 → 3.1 → 3.2) showed significant improvement in the leg pain NRS scores after treatment. Group C (41.4 → 19.5 → 13.7) demonstrated significant improvement in the ODI up to 1 year after treatment; however, no significant difference was found in group R (35.7 → 31.7 → 26.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although intradiscal condoliase injection is less effective for LDH recurrence than for initial cases, it is useful for improving leg pain and can be considered a minimally invasive and safe treatment method.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"550-559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of intradiscal condoliase injection therapy for patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation.\",\"authors\":\"Noritaka Suzuki, Yawara Eguchi, Takashi Hirai, Takuya Takahashi, Yohei Takahashi, Kota Watanabe, Tomohiro Banno, Kyohei Sakaki, Satoshi Maki, Yuuichi Takano, Yuki Taniguchi, Yasuchika Aoki, Takamitsu Konishi, Yutaka Hiraizumi, Masatsune Yamagata, Akihiro Hirakawa, Seiji Ohtori\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2024.0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare data from patients who received intradiscal condoliase (chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase) injection for primary lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and recurrent LDH.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Chemonucleolysis with condoliase for LDH is a treatment with relatively good results and a high safety profile; however, few studies have reported recurrence after LDH surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study participants were 249 patients who underwent intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH at nine participating institutions, including 241 patients with initial LDH (group C) and eight with recurrent LDH (group R). Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, disease duration, intervertebral LDH level, smoking history, and diabetes history were evaluated. Low back pain/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical symptoms before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low back pain NRS scores (before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment, respectively) in group C (4.9 → 2.6 → 1.8) showed significant improvement until 1 year after treatment. Although a tendency for improvement was observed in group R (3.5 → 2.8 → 2.2), no significant difference was noted. Groups C (6.6 → 2.4 → 1.4) and R (7.0 → 3.1 → 3.2) showed significant improvement in the leg pain NRS scores after treatment. Group C (41.4 → 19.5 → 13.7) demonstrated significant improvement in the ODI up to 1 year after treatment; however, no significant difference was found in group R (35.7 → 31.7 → 26.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although intradiscal condoliase injection is less effective for LDH recurrence than for initial cases, it is useful for improving leg pain and can be considered a minimally invasive and safe treatment method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"550-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性队列研究.目的:本研究旨在比较接受椎间盘内髁突酶(硫酸软骨素ABC内溶解酶)注射治疗原发性腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)和复发性LDH患者的数据.文献综述:椎间盘内溶解酶治疗LDH是一种效果相对较好、安全性较高的治疗方法,但很少有研究报道LDH术后复发的情况:研究对象为9家参与机构的249名接受椎间盘内髁突酶注射治疗LDH的患者,其中包括241名初次LDH患者(C组)和8名复发LDH患者(R组)。对患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、病程、椎间盘 LDH 水平、吸烟史和糖尿病史等特征进行了评估。腰痛/腿痛数字评定量表(NRS)评分和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)用于评估治疗前、治疗后6个月和1年的临床症状:C组的腰痛NRS评分(治疗前、治疗后6个月和1年时分别为4.9 → 2.6 → 1.8)在治疗1年后有明显改善。虽然 R 组(3.5 → 2.8 → 2.2)有改善趋势,但无明显差异。治疗后,C 组(6.6 → 2.4 → 1.4)和 R 组(7.0 → 3.1 → 3.2)的腿部疼痛 NRS 评分有明显改善。C组(41.4 → 19.5 → 13.7)的ODI在治疗一年后有明显改善;但R组(35.7 → 31.7 → 26.4)无明显差异:结论:虽然椎间盘内髁状突注射对 LDH 复发的疗效不如初发病例,但它对改善腿部疼痛很有帮助,可视为一种微创、安全的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of intradiscal condoliase injection therapy for patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare data from patients who received intradiscal condoliase (chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase) injection for primary lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and recurrent LDH.

Overview of literature: Chemonucleolysis with condoliase for LDH is a treatment with relatively good results and a high safety profile; however, few studies have reported recurrence after LDH surgery.

Methods: The study participants were 249 patients who underwent intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH at nine participating institutions, including 241 patients with initial LDH (group C) and eight with recurrent LDH (group R). Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, disease duration, intervertebral LDH level, smoking history, and diabetes history were evaluated. Low back pain/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical symptoms before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment.

Results: Low back pain NRS scores (before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment, respectively) in group C (4.9 → 2.6 → 1.8) showed significant improvement until 1 year after treatment. Although a tendency for improvement was observed in group R (3.5 → 2.8 → 2.2), no significant difference was noted. Groups C (6.6 → 2.4 → 1.4) and R (7.0 → 3.1 → 3.2) showed significant improvement in the leg pain NRS scores after treatment. Group C (41.4 → 19.5 → 13.7) demonstrated significant improvement in the ODI up to 1 year after treatment; however, no significant difference was found in group R (35.7 → 31.7 → 26.4).

Conclusions: Although intradiscal condoliase injection is less effective for LDH recurrence than for initial cases, it is useful for improving leg pain and can be considered a minimally invasive and safe treatment method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信