人工智能机器学习算法与标准线性人口统计学分析在预测解剖型和反向全肩关节置换术植入物大小方面的对比。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Amir Boubekri, Michael Murphy, Michael Scheidt, Krishin Shivdasani, Joshua Anderson, Nickolas Garbis, Dane Salazar
{"title":"人工智能机器学习算法与标准线性人口统计学分析在预测解剖型和反向全肩关节置换术植入物大小方面的对比。","authors":"Amir Boubekri, Michael Murphy, Michael Scheidt, Krishin Shivdasani, Joshua Anderson, Nickolas Garbis, Dane Salazar","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate and precise templating is paramount for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to enhance preoperative planning, streamline surgery, and improve implant positioning. We aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of readily available patient demographic data in TSA and RSA implant sizing, independent of implant design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 578 consecutive, primary, noncemented shoulder arthroplasty cases were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic variables and implant characteristics were recorded. Multivariate linear regressions were conducted to predict implant sizes using patient demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear models accurately predict TSA implant sizes within 2 millimeters of humerus stem sizes 75.3% of the time, head diameter 82.1%, head height 82.1%, and RSA glenosphere diameter 77.6% of the time. Linear models predict glenoid implant sizes accurately 68.2% and polyethylene thickness 76.6% of the time and within one size 100% and 95.7% of the time, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Linear models accurately predict shoulder arthroplasty implant sizes from demographic data. No significant statistical differences were observed between linear models and machine learning algorithms, although the analysis was underpowered. Future sufficiently powered studies are required for more robust assessment of machine learning models in predicting primary shoulder arthroplasty implant sizes based on patient demographics.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"8 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Algorithms Versus Standard Linear Demographic Analysis in Predicting Implant Size of Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Boubekri, Michael Murphy, Michael Scheidt, Krishin Shivdasani, Joshua Anderson, Nickolas Garbis, Dane Salazar\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate and precise templating is paramount for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to enhance preoperative planning, streamline surgery, and improve implant positioning. We aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of readily available patient demographic data in TSA and RSA implant sizing, independent of implant design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 578 consecutive, primary, noncemented shoulder arthroplasty cases were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic variables and implant characteristics were recorded. Multivariate linear regressions were conducted to predict implant sizes using patient demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear models accurately predict TSA implant sizes within 2 millimeters of humerus stem sizes 75.3% of the time, head diameter 82.1%, head height 82.1%, and RSA glenosphere diameter 77.6% of the time. Linear models predict glenoid implant sizes accurately 68.2% and polyethylene thickness 76.6% of the time and within one size 100% and 95.7% of the time, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Linear models accurately predict shoulder arthroplasty implant sizes from demographic data. No significant statistical differences were observed between linear models and machine learning algorithms, although the analysis was underpowered. Future sufficiently powered studies are required for more robust assessment of machine learning models in predicting primary shoulder arthroplasty implant sizes based on patient demographics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"8 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于解剖型全肩关节置换术(TSA)和反向全肩关节置换术(RSA)而言,准确和精确的模板至关重要,可增强术前规划、简化手术和改善植入物定位。我们的目的是评估现成的患者人口统计学数据在 TSA 和 RSA 植入物选型中的预测潜力,而与植入物设计无关:我们对 578 例连续的初级非骨水泥肩关节置换术病例进行了回顾性研究。记录了人口统计学变量和植入物特征。利用患者人口统计学变量进行多变量线性回归,以预测植入物的大小:线性模型在75.3%的情况下能准确预测肱骨柄2毫米以内的TSA植入物尺寸,在82.1%的情况下能准确预测头部直径,在82.1%的情况下能准确预测头部高度,在77.6%的情况下能准确预测RSA盂直径。线性模型预测盂植入物尺寸的准确率为68.2%,预测聚乙烯厚度的准确率为76.6%,预测一个尺寸范围内的准确率分别为100%和95.7%:结论:线性模型能根据人口统计学数据准确预测肩关节置换术植入物的尺寸。结论:线性模型能从人口统计学数据中准确预测肩关节置换术植入物的尺寸,尽管分析结果显示线性模型和机器学习算法之间没有明显的统计学差异。未来需要进行充分的研究,以便更有力地评估机器学习模型在根据患者人口统计学数据预测初次肩关节置换术植入物大小方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Algorithms Versus Standard Linear Demographic Analysis in Predicting Implant Size of Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Background: Accurate and precise templating is paramount for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to enhance preoperative planning, streamline surgery, and improve implant positioning. We aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of readily available patient demographic data in TSA and RSA implant sizing, independent of implant design.

Methods: A total of 578 consecutive, primary, noncemented shoulder arthroplasty cases were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic variables and implant characteristics were recorded. Multivariate linear regressions were conducted to predict implant sizes using patient demographic variables.

Results: Linear models accurately predict TSA implant sizes within 2 millimeters of humerus stem sizes 75.3% of the time, head diameter 82.1%, head height 82.1%, and RSA glenosphere diameter 77.6% of the time. Linear models predict glenoid implant sizes accurately 68.2% and polyethylene thickness 76.6% of the time and within one size 100% and 95.7% of the time, respectively.

Conclusion: Linear models accurately predict shoulder arthroplasty implant sizes from demographic data. No significant statistical differences were observed between linear models and machine learning algorithms, although the analysis was underpowered. Future sufficiently powered studies are required for more robust assessment of machine learning models in predicting primary shoulder arthroplasty implant sizes based on patient demographics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信