筛查时代结直肠癌手术切除率的趋势:意大利的一项回顾性研究。

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Manuel Zorzi, Lucia Calciano, Nicola Gennaro, Laura Memo, Silvia Rizzato, Carmen Stocco, Emanuele D L Urso, Silvia Negro, Gaya Spolverato, Salvatore Pucciarelli, Marta Sbaraglia, Stefano Guzzinati
{"title":"筛查时代结直肠癌手术切除率的趋势:意大利的一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Manuel Zorzi, Lucia Calciano, Nicola Gennaro, Laura Memo, Silvia Rizzato, Carmen Stocco, Emanuele D L Urso, Silvia Negro, Gaya Spolverato, Salvatore Pucciarelli, Marta Sbaraglia, Stefano Guzzinati","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening is effective in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but its sensitivity for proximal lesions remains low.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared age-adjusted CRC surgical resection rates across anatomic sites (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), age groups and sex over 20 years in a large Italian population. We particularly focused on changes in trends following FIT-screening implementation in the target population (50-69 years).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective study analysed data from the Veneto Region's administrative Hospital Discharge Dataset, involving over 54 000 patients aged 40-89 (43.4% female) who underwent CRC surgery between 2002 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, surgery rates increased until 2007 (annual percentage changes: 2.5% in males, 2.9% in females) and then declined (-4.2% in males, -3.4% in females). This decline was steeper for distal and rectal cancers compared with proximal cancer, suggesting a shift towards more right-sided CRC surgery.In males, the prescreening increase in proximal surgery was reversed after screening implementation (slope change: -6%) while the prescreening decline accelerated for distal (-4%) and rectal (-3%) surgeries. In females, stable prescreening trends shifted downward for all sites (-5% for proximal, -8% for distal and -7% for rectal surgery). However, the change in trends between prescreening and postscreening periods was not different across anatomic sites for either sex (all slope change differences in pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The shift towards proximal surgery may not be entirely due to the FIT's low sensitivity but may reflect an underlying upward trend in proximal cancers independent of screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in colorectal cancer surgical resection rates during the screening era: a retrospective study in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Zorzi, Lucia Calciano, Nicola Gennaro, Laura Memo, Silvia Rizzato, Carmen Stocco, Emanuele D L Urso, Silvia Negro, Gaya Spolverato, Salvatore Pucciarelli, Marta Sbaraglia, Stefano Guzzinati\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening is effective in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but its sensitivity for proximal lesions remains low.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared age-adjusted CRC surgical resection rates across anatomic sites (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), age groups and sex over 20 years in a large Italian population. We particularly focused on changes in trends following FIT-screening implementation in the target population (50-69 years).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective study analysed data from the Veneto Region's administrative Hospital Discharge Dataset, involving over 54 000 patients aged 40-89 (43.4% female) who underwent CRC surgery between 2002 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, surgery rates increased until 2007 (annual percentage changes: 2.5% in males, 2.9% in females) and then declined (-4.2% in males, -3.4% in females). This decline was steeper for distal and rectal cancers compared with proximal cancer, suggesting a shift towards more right-sided CRC surgery.In males, the prescreening increase in proximal surgery was reversed after screening implementation (slope change: -6%) while the prescreening decline accelerated for distal (-4%) and rectal (-3%) surgeries. In females, stable prescreening trends shifted downward for all sites (-5% for proximal, -8% for distal and -7% for rectal surgery). However, the change in trends between prescreening and postscreening periods was not different across anatomic sites for either sex (all slope change differences in pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The shift towards proximal surgery may not be entirely due to the FIT's low sensitivity but may reflect an underlying upward trend in proximal cancers independent of screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308884/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)的筛查能有效降低结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率,但其对近端病变的敏感性仍然很低:我们比较了 20 年来意大利大量人口中不同解剖部位(近端结肠、远端结肠、直肠)、年龄组和性别的年龄调整后 CRC 手术切除率。我们特别关注了在目标人群(50-69 岁)中实施 FIT 筛查后的趋势变化:这项回顾性研究分析了威尼托大区行政医院出院数据集的数据,涉及 2002 年至 2021 年期间接受 CRC 手术的 54000 多名 40-89 岁患者(43.4% 为女性):总体而言,手术率在2007年之前一直在上升(年百分比变化:男性为2.5%,女性为2.9%),之后有所下降(男性为-4.2%,女性为-3.4%)。与近端癌相比,远端癌和直肠癌的下降幅度更大,这表明更多的右侧 CRC 手术发生了转变。在男性中,近端手术筛查前的增长在筛查实施后发生了逆转(斜率变化:-6%),而远端(-4%)和直肠(-3%)手术筛查前的下降速度加快。在女性中,所有部位的筛查前稳定趋势均向下移动(近端手术-5%,远端手术-8%,直肠手术-7%)。然而,筛查前和筛查后的趋势变化在解剖部位上没有性别差异(成对比较的所有斜率变化差异均无统计学意义):结论:向近端手术的转变可能并不完全是因为 FIT 的灵敏度较低,而是反映了近端癌症的潜在上升趋势与筛查无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in colorectal cancer surgical resection rates during the screening era: a retrospective study in Italy.

Background: Faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening is effective in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but its sensitivity for proximal lesions remains low.

Objectives: We compared age-adjusted CRC surgical resection rates across anatomic sites (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), age groups and sex over 20 years in a large Italian population. We particularly focused on changes in trends following FIT-screening implementation in the target population (50-69 years).

Design: This retrospective study analysed data from the Veneto Region's administrative Hospital Discharge Dataset, involving over 54 000 patients aged 40-89 (43.4% female) who underwent CRC surgery between 2002 and 2021.

Results: Overall, surgery rates increased until 2007 (annual percentage changes: 2.5% in males, 2.9% in females) and then declined (-4.2% in males, -3.4% in females). This decline was steeper for distal and rectal cancers compared with proximal cancer, suggesting a shift towards more right-sided CRC surgery.In males, the prescreening increase in proximal surgery was reversed after screening implementation (slope change: -6%) while the prescreening decline accelerated for distal (-4%) and rectal (-3%) surgeries. In females, stable prescreening trends shifted downward for all sites (-5% for proximal, -8% for distal and -7% for rectal surgery). However, the change in trends between prescreening and postscreening periods was not different across anatomic sites for either sex (all slope change differences in pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant).

Conclusion: The shift towards proximal surgery may not be entirely due to the FIT's low sensitivity but may reflect an underlying upward trend in proximal cancers independent of screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信