取消低价值医疗实践的有效性:系统性回顾综述。

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Christina Kien, Julia Daxenbichler, Viktoria Titscher, Julia Baenziger, Pauline Klingenstein, Rahel Naef, Irma Klerings, Lauren Clack, Julian Fila, Isolde Sommer
{"title":"取消低价值医疗实践的有效性:系统性回顾综述。","authors":"Christina Kien, Julia Daxenbichler, Viktoria Titscher, Julia Baenziger, Pauline Klingenstein, Rahel Naef, Irma Klerings, Lauren Clack, Julian Fila, Isolde Sommer","doi":"10.1186/s13012-024-01384-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing low-value care (LVC) is crucial to improve the quality of patient care while increasing the efficient use of scarce healthcare resources. Recently, strategies to de-implement LVC have been mapped against the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of strategies. However, such strategies' effectiveness across different healthcare practices has not been addressed. This overview of systematic reviews aimed to investigate the effectiveness of de-implementation initiatives and specific ERIC strategy clusters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) from 1 January 2010 to 17 April 2023 and used additional search strategies to identify relevant systematic reviews (SRs). Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts against a priori-defined criteria, assessed the SR quality and extracted pre-specified data. We created harvest plots to display the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 46 included SRs, 27 focused on drug treatments, such as antibiotics or opioids, twelve on laboratory tests or diagnostic imaging and seven on other healthcare practices. In categorising de-implementation strategies, SR authors applied different techniques: creating self-developed strategies (n = 12), focussing on specific de-implementation strategies (n = 14) and using published taxonomies (n = 12). Overall, 15 SRs provided evidence for the effectiveness of de-implementation interventions to reduce antibiotic and opioid utilisation. Reduced utilisation, albeit inconsistently significant, was documented in the use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, as well as in laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging. Strategies within the adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelationships, and change infrastructure and workflow ERIC clusters led to a consistent reduction in LVC practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>De-implementation initiatives were effective in reducing medication usage, and inconsistent significant reductions were observed for LVC laboratory tests and imaging. Notably, de-implementation clusters such as change infrastructure and workflow and develop stakeholder interrelationships emerged as the most encouraging avenues. Additionally, we provided suggestions to enhance SR quality, emphasising adherence to guidelines for synthesising complex interventions, prioritising appropriateness of care outcomes, documenting the development process of de-implementation initiatives and ensuring consistent reporting of applied de-implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>OSF Open Science Framework 5ruzw.</p>","PeriodicalId":54995,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Kien, Julia Daxenbichler, Viktoria Titscher, Julia Baenziger, Pauline Klingenstein, Rahel Naef, Irma Klerings, Lauren Clack, Julian Fila, Isolde Sommer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13012-024-01384-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing low-value care (LVC) is crucial to improve the quality of patient care while increasing the efficient use of scarce healthcare resources. Recently, strategies to de-implement LVC have been mapped against the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of strategies. However, such strategies' effectiveness across different healthcare practices has not been addressed. This overview of systematic reviews aimed to investigate the effectiveness of de-implementation initiatives and specific ERIC strategy clusters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) from 1 January 2010 to 17 April 2023 and used additional search strategies to identify relevant systematic reviews (SRs). Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts against a priori-defined criteria, assessed the SR quality and extracted pre-specified data. We created harvest plots to display the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 46 included SRs, 27 focused on drug treatments, such as antibiotics or opioids, twelve on laboratory tests or diagnostic imaging and seven on other healthcare practices. In categorising de-implementation strategies, SR authors applied different techniques: creating self-developed strategies (n = 12), focussing on specific de-implementation strategies (n = 14) and using published taxonomies (n = 12). Overall, 15 SRs provided evidence for the effectiveness of de-implementation interventions to reduce antibiotic and opioid utilisation. Reduced utilisation, albeit inconsistently significant, was documented in the use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, as well as in laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging. Strategies within the adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelationships, and change infrastructure and workflow ERIC clusters led to a consistent reduction in LVC practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>De-implementation initiatives were effective in reducing medication usage, and inconsistent significant reductions were observed for LVC laboratory tests and imaging. Notably, de-implementation clusters such as change infrastructure and workflow and develop stakeholder interrelationships emerged as the most encouraging avenues. Additionally, we provided suggestions to enhance SR quality, emphasising adherence to guidelines for synthesising complex interventions, prioritising appropriateness of care outcomes, documenting the development process of de-implementation initiatives and ensuring consistent reporting of applied de-implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>OSF Open Science Framework 5ruzw.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation Science\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299416/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01384-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01384-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:减少低价值护理(LVC)对于提高患者护理质量,同时提高稀缺医疗资源的使用效率至关重要。最近,根据专家建议实施变革(ERIC)的战略汇编,对消除低价值护理的战略进行了规划。然而,这些策略在不同医疗实践中的有效性尚未得到研究。这篇系统性综述旨在研究去实施化举措和特定 ERIC 策略集群的有效性:我们检索了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 4 月 17 日期间的 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Epistemonikos.org 和 Scopus (Elsevier),并使用其他检索策略确定了相关的系统综述 (SR)。两名审稿人根据事先定义的标准独立筛选摘要和全文,评估系统综述的质量并提取预先指定的数据。我们绘制了收获图来显示结果:结果:在46篇纳入的研究报告中,27篇侧重于药物治疗,如抗生素或阿片类药物,12篇侧重于实验室检测或影像诊断,7篇侧重于其他医疗实践。在对去实施化策略进行分类时,研究报告的作者采用了不同的技术:创建自主开发的策略(12 篇)、关注特定的去实施化策略(14 篇)以及使用已发布的分类标准(12 篇)。总体而言,15 份研究报告提供了证据,证明取消实施干预措施对减少抗生素和阿片类药物使用的有效性。在抗精神病药物和苯二氮卓类药物的使用以及实验室检查和诊断成像方面,都有证据表明使用量有所减少,尽管减少的幅度并不一致。根据具体情况进行调整和定制、发展利益相关者之间的相互关系以及改变基础设施和工作流程等ERIC集群内的战略导致了LVC实践的持续减少:结论:"去执行化 "倡议能有效减少药物使用量,在低用药量实验室检测和成像方面也观察到了不一致的显著减少。值得注意的是,改变基础设施和工作流程以及发展利益相关者之间的相互关系等去实施化群组是最令人鼓舞的途径。此外,我们还提出了提高SR质量的建议,强调要遵守综合复杂干预措施的指导方针,优先考虑护理结果的适当性,记录去实施化举措的发展过程,并确保应用去实施化策略的报告连贯一致:OSF 开放科学框架 5ruzw。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews.

Background: Reducing low-value care (LVC) is crucial to improve the quality of patient care while increasing the efficient use of scarce healthcare resources. Recently, strategies to de-implement LVC have been mapped against the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of strategies. However, such strategies' effectiveness across different healthcare practices has not been addressed. This overview of systematic reviews aimed to investigate the effectiveness of de-implementation initiatives and specific ERIC strategy clusters.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) from 1 January 2010 to 17 April 2023 and used additional search strategies to identify relevant systematic reviews (SRs). Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts against a priori-defined criteria, assessed the SR quality and extracted pre-specified data. We created harvest plots to display the results.

Results: Of 46 included SRs, 27 focused on drug treatments, such as antibiotics or opioids, twelve on laboratory tests or diagnostic imaging and seven on other healthcare practices. In categorising de-implementation strategies, SR authors applied different techniques: creating self-developed strategies (n = 12), focussing on specific de-implementation strategies (n = 14) and using published taxonomies (n = 12). Overall, 15 SRs provided evidence for the effectiveness of de-implementation interventions to reduce antibiotic and opioid utilisation. Reduced utilisation, albeit inconsistently significant, was documented in the use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, as well as in laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging. Strategies within the adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelationships, and change infrastructure and workflow ERIC clusters led to a consistent reduction in LVC practices.

Conclusion: De-implementation initiatives were effective in reducing medication usage, and inconsistent significant reductions were observed for LVC laboratory tests and imaging. Notably, de-implementation clusters such as change infrastructure and workflow and develop stakeholder interrelationships emerged as the most encouraging avenues. Additionally, we provided suggestions to enhance SR quality, emphasising adherence to guidelines for synthesising complex interventions, prioritising appropriateness of care outcomes, documenting the development process of de-implementation initiatives and ensuring consistent reporting of applied de-implementation strategies.

Registration: OSF Open Science Framework 5ruzw.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Implementation Science
Implementation Science 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Implementation Science is a leading journal committed to disseminating evidence on methods for integrating research findings into routine healthcare practice and policy. It offers a multidisciplinary platform for studying implementation strategies, encompassing their development, outcomes, economics, processes, and associated factors. The journal prioritizes rigorous studies and innovative, theory-based approaches, covering implementation science across various healthcare services and settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信