虚拟社区参与式研究试验中的干预保真度。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000765
Holly J Jones, Tamilyn Bakas, Patricia Bacchus, Vedat O Yildiz, Melinda Butsch Kovacic
{"title":"虚拟社区参与式研究试验中的干预保真度。","authors":"Holly J Jones, Tamilyn Bakas, Patricia Bacchus, Vedat O Yildiz, Melinda Butsch Kovacic","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this report is to describe approaches used to ensure fidelity in the B-SWELL feasibility trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A virtual randomized feasibility trial was conducted. Intervention fidelity was evaluated in accordance with Borrelli's five principles of fidelity: design, training, delivery, receipt, and enactment. In addition to the rigorous oversight by the research team, tools were developed or adapted for the virtual trial. Tools used in the trial included a Visual Analog Attendee Engagement Tool, weekly feedback surveys, audio recordings, a facilitator's checklist, an overall satisfaction survey, and a technology survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Borrelli's framework for treatment fidelity, the researchers noted high ratings from the overall satisfaction survey, designed to assess ongoing participant satisfaction with the intervention materials and continued enactment. The tools successfully guided the intervention process from design to enactment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adherence to Borrelli's principles of fidelity enables rigorous oversight of an intervention and its delivery. The growing use of technology to deliver programmed interventions requires that tools be adapted and created to monitor fidelity. Validation of the research-developed and -adapted tools is recommended in a larger trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"474-483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention Fidelity in a Virtual Community Participatory Research Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Holly J Jones, Tamilyn Bakas, Patricia Bacchus, Vedat O Yildiz, Melinda Butsch Kovacic\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this report is to describe approaches used to ensure fidelity in the B-SWELL feasibility trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A virtual randomized feasibility trial was conducted. Intervention fidelity was evaluated in accordance with Borrelli's five principles of fidelity: design, training, delivery, receipt, and enactment. In addition to the rigorous oversight by the research team, tools were developed or adapted for the virtual trial. Tools used in the trial included a Visual Analog Attendee Engagement Tool, weekly feedback surveys, audio recordings, a facilitator's checklist, an overall satisfaction survey, and a technology survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Borrelli's framework for treatment fidelity, the researchers noted high ratings from the overall satisfaction survey, designed to assess ongoing participant satisfaction with the intervention materials and continued enactment. The tools successfully guided the intervention process from design to enactment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adherence to Borrelli's principles of fidelity enables rigorous oversight of an intervention and its delivery. The growing use of technology to deliver programmed interventions requires that tools be adapted and created to monitor fidelity. Validation of the research-developed and -adapted tools is recommended in a larger trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"474-483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000765\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中年黑人妇女(45-64 岁)罹患心血管疾病的比例过高,但针对这一高风险亚人群的计划仍然很少。中年黑人妇女的压力与健康(B-SWELL)计划是与社区代表共同制定的,旨在提供适合不同文化背景的材料和内容,以促进采用更健康的生活方式,改善心血管健康。很少有报告强调社区参与式研究中用于监控忠实性的方法:本报告旨在介绍 B-SWELL 可行性试验中用于确保忠实性的方法:方法:开展了一项虚拟随机可行性试验。根据博雷利(Borrelli)提出的 "忠实性五原则"(设计、培训、交付、接收和实施),对干预的忠实性进行了评估。除了研究团队的严格监督外,还为虚拟试验开发或调整了工具。试验中使用的工具包括可视模拟与会者参与工具、每周反馈调查、录音、主持人检查表、总体满意度调查和技术调查:研究人员采用博雷利(Borrelli)的治疗忠诚度框架,注意到总体满意度调查的评分很高,该调查旨在评估参与者对干预材料和持续实施的满意度。这些工具成功地指导了从设计到实施的干预过程:讨论:遵守博雷利的忠实性原则可以对干预及其实施进行严格的监督。由于越来越多地使用技术来实施程序化干预,因此需要调整和创建工具来监测忠实性。建议在更大规模的试验中对研究开发和改编的工具进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intervention Fidelity in a Virtual Community Participatory Research Trial.

Objective: The objective of this report is to describe approaches used to ensure fidelity in the B-SWELL feasibility trial.

Methods: A virtual randomized feasibility trial was conducted. Intervention fidelity was evaluated in accordance with Borrelli's five principles of fidelity: design, training, delivery, receipt, and enactment. In addition to the rigorous oversight by the research team, tools were developed or adapted for the virtual trial. Tools used in the trial included a Visual Analog Attendee Engagement Tool, weekly feedback surveys, audio recordings, a facilitator's checklist, an overall satisfaction survey, and a technology survey.

Results: Using Borrelli's framework for treatment fidelity, the researchers noted high ratings from the overall satisfaction survey, designed to assess ongoing participant satisfaction with the intervention materials and continued enactment. The tools successfully guided the intervention process from design to enactment.

Discussion: Adherence to Borrelli's principles of fidelity enables rigorous oversight of an intervention and its delivery. The growing use of technology to deliver programmed interventions requires that tools be adapted and created to monitor fidelity. Validation of the research-developed and -adapted tools is recommended in a larger trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信