{"title":"内窥镜鼻窦手术后有效冲洗额窦的必要因素:系统回顾","authors":"Yingting Qi, Junsheng Hong, Dawei Wu","doi":"10.1177/19160216241269375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The frontal sinus remains a challenging site for irrigation due to its position relative to the nostril and ethmoid sinus. This study aims to summarize the necessary factors for efficient irrigation of the frontal sinus after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify studies assessing the effect of frontal sinus irrigation in patients with CRS, cadaver models, or 3D-printed models of the sinonasal cavity after ESS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the initial 206 abstracts reviewed, 18 full-text articles were included. The degree of the frontal sinus ostium opening after ESS was found to be associated with the efficacy of frontal sinus irrigation. More extensive frontal sinus surgeries tended to increase frontal sinus penetration. A Draf IIA procedure was identified as the minimum standard to achieve sufficient irrigation in the frontal sinus. Due to decreased backpressure in the nasal passage, increasing septectomy in Draf III did not significantly improve irrigation delivery. Squeeze bottles achieved significantly higher irrigation flow in the frontal sinus than syringes and pulsating devices. Large-volume irrigation devices provided better irrigation for the frontal sinus by entering or flushing the entire frontal sinus. The head position influenced the frontal sinus irrigation by altering the ostia position relative to fluid flow and vertical height of the frontal sinus during irrigation. While the vertex down head position was likely to enhance frontal sinus irrigation, the comfort of the head position and patient compliance should be considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elements for optimization of frontal sinus irrigation are a minimum of a Draf IlA procedure for frontal sinus dissection, use of large-volume irrigation, and vertex down head positioning. Developing comfortable head positions with high frontal sinus irrigation efficiency would increase patient compliance and improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"53 ","pages":"19160216241269375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Necessary Factors for Efficient Frontal Sinus Irrigation After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Yingting Qi, Junsheng Hong, Dawei Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19160216241269375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The frontal sinus remains a challenging site for irrigation due to its position relative to the nostril and ethmoid sinus. This study aims to summarize the necessary factors for efficient irrigation of the frontal sinus after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify studies assessing the effect of frontal sinus irrigation in patients with CRS, cadaver models, or 3D-printed models of the sinonasal cavity after ESS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the initial 206 abstracts reviewed, 18 full-text articles were included. The degree of the frontal sinus ostium opening after ESS was found to be associated with the efficacy of frontal sinus irrigation. More extensive frontal sinus surgeries tended to increase frontal sinus penetration. A Draf IIA procedure was identified as the minimum standard to achieve sufficient irrigation in the frontal sinus. Due to decreased backpressure in the nasal passage, increasing septectomy in Draf III did not significantly improve irrigation delivery. Squeeze bottles achieved significantly higher irrigation flow in the frontal sinus than syringes and pulsating devices. Large-volume irrigation devices provided better irrigation for the frontal sinus by entering or flushing the entire frontal sinus. The head position influenced the frontal sinus irrigation by altering the ostia position relative to fluid flow and vertical height of the frontal sinus during irrigation. While the vertex down head position was likely to enhance frontal sinus irrigation, the comfort of the head position and patient compliance should be considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elements for optimization of frontal sinus irrigation are a minimum of a Draf IlA procedure for frontal sinus dissection, use of large-volume irrigation, and vertex down head positioning. Developing comfortable head positions with high frontal sinus irrigation efficiency would increase patient compliance and improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"19160216241269375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304481/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241269375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241269375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:由于额窦与鼻孔和乙状窦的相对位置,额窦仍是一个具有挑战性的灌洗部位。本研究旨在总结慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)患者进行内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)后有效灌洗额窦的必要因素:采用系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis,PRISMA)指南,在PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane数据库中进行了系统文献综述,以确定评估CRS患者额窦灌洗效果的研究、尸体模型或ESS术后鼻窦腔3D打印模型:结果:在最初审查的 206 篇摘要中,有 18 篇全文被收录。研究发现,ESS术后额窦骨膜的开放程度与额窦灌洗的疗效有关。额窦手术范围越大,额窦穿透力越强。Draf IIA 手术被认为是实现额窦充分冲洗的最低标准。由于鼻腔内的背压降低,在 Draf III 中增加鼻中隔切除术并不能明显改善灌洗效果。与注射器和脉动装置相比,挤压瓶在额窦的灌洗流量明显更高。大流量冲洗装置通过进入或冲洗整个额窦为额窦提供了更好的冲洗。在冲洗过程中,头部位置通过改变相对于流体的骨孔位置和额窦的垂直高度来影响额窦冲洗。虽然头顶向下的位置可能会加强额窦冲洗,但应考虑头部位置的舒适性和患者的顺从性:额窦灌洗的优化要素包括额窦剥离的最低Draf IlA程序、大容量灌洗的使用以及头顶向下的体位。发展舒适的头部姿势,提高额窦灌洗效率,将提高患者的依从性并改善疗效:不适用。
Necessary Factors for Efficient Frontal Sinus Irrigation After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Objective: The frontal sinus remains a challenging site for irrigation due to its position relative to the nostril and ethmoid sinus. This study aims to summarize the necessary factors for efficient irrigation of the frontal sinus after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify studies assessing the effect of frontal sinus irrigation in patients with CRS, cadaver models, or 3D-printed models of the sinonasal cavity after ESS.
Results: Of the initial 206 abstracts reviewed, 18 full-text articles were included. The degree of the frontal sinus ostium opening after ESS was found to be associated with the efficacy of frontal sinus irrigation. More extensive frontal sinus surgeries tended to increase frontal sinus penetration. A Draf IIA procedure was identified as the minimum standard to achieve sufficient irrigation in the frontal sinus. Due to decreased backpressure in the nasal passage, increasing septectomy in Draf III did not significantly improve irrigation delivery. Squeeze bottles achieved significantly higher irrigation flow in the frontal sinus than syringes and pulsating devices. Large-volume irrigation devices provided better irrigation for the frontal sinus by entering or flushing the entire frontal sinus. The head position influenced the frontal sinus irrigation by altering the ostia position relative to fluid flow and vertical height of the frontal sinus during irrigation. While the vertex down head position was likely to enhance frontal sinus irrigation, the comfort of the head position and patient compliance should be considered.
Conclusion: Elements for optimization of frontal sinus irrigation are a minimum of a Draf IlA procedure for frontal sinus dissection, use of large-volume irrigation, and vertex down head positioning. Developing comfortable head positions with high frontal sinus irrigation efficiency would increase patient compliance and improve outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.