利用准实验对照评估脑损伤住院后的康复效果。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000993
Devan Parrott, David B Salisbury, Irwin M Altman, Daniel M Logan, Claire McGrath, G Joseph Walters, James F Malec
{"title":"利用准实验对照评估脑损伤住院后的康复效果。","authors":"Devan Parrott, David B Salisbury, Irwin M Altman, Daniel M Logan, Claire McGrath, G Joseph Walters, James F Malec","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To further evaluate, using quasi-experimental methodologies, posthospital brain injury rehabilitation outcomes described in an accompanying report of a large observational study ( n = 2120).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data from Intensive Rehabilitation (IR: Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation) and Supported Living (SL) programs serving individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two hundred twenty-eight individuals with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other ABI in propensity score analysis; 1344 in analysis by extent of recommended treatment completed (TC) rating.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Sex, age, time since injury, Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4th edition (MPAI-4) Rasch-derived T-scores, and TC rating.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Analyses of covariance (1) of discharge MPAI-4 Total, index, and subscale T-scores on propensity score-matched samples of IR and SL participants controlling for admission scores and (2) of MPAI-4 T-scores by TC rating and diagnostic category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score-matched groups showed superior outcomes for IR participants compared to SL participants on MPAI-4 Total T-score ( F = 77.21, P < .001; partial η 2  = 0.257) and all MPAI-4 index and subscale T-scores controlling for sex, age, and baseline scores. Participants with traumatic brain injury and stroke who completed the recommended course of rehabilitation had superior outcomes on all MPAI-4 T-scores compared to those who completed less than or much less than the recommended treatment. No additional benefit was apparent for those who completed more than the recommended course. The association between TC rating and outcome was not significant for the other ABI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These analyses using quasi-experimental controls provide more scientifically rigorous evidence of the benefit of IR provided through posthospital brain injury rehabilitation programs after acute inpatient care, consistent with the results of numerous observational studies. However, improved internal validity limits external validity and generalization. The absence of a significant association between TC rating and outcomes for the other ABI group most likely reflects the difficulty prescribing rehabilitation for this highly heterogeneous group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcomes With Quasi-Experimental Controls.\",\"authors\":\"Devan Parrott, David B Salisbury, Irwin M Altman, Daniel M Logan, Claire McGrath, G Joseph Walters, James F Malec\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To further evaluate, using quasi-experimental methodologies, posthospital brain injury rehabilitation outcomes described in an accompanying report of a large observational study ( n = 2120).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data from Intensive Rehabilitation (IR: Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation) and Supported Living (SL) programs serving individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two hundred twenty-eight individuals with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other ABI in propensity score analysis; 1344 in analysis by extent of recommended treatment completed (TC) rating.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Sex, age, time since injury, Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4th edition (MPAI-4) Rasch-derived T-scores, and TC rating.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Analyses of covariance (1) of discharge MPAI-4 Total, index, and subscale T-scores on propensity score-matched samples of IR and SL participants controlling for admission scores and (2) of MPAI-4 T-scores by TC rating and diagnostic category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score-matched groups showed superior outcomes for IR participants compared to SL participants on MPAI-4 Total T-score ( F = 77.21, P < .001; partial η 2  = 0.257) and all MPAI-4 index and subscale T-scores controlling for sex, age, and baseline scores. Participants with traumatic brain injury and stroke who completed the recommended course of rehabilitation had superior outcomes on all MPAI-4 T-scores compared to those who completed less than or much less than the recommended treatment. No additional benefit was apparent for those who completed more than the recommended course. The association between TC rating and outcome was not significant for the other ABI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These analyses using quasi-experimental controls provide more scientifically rigorous evidence of the benefit of IR provided through posthospital brain injury rehabilitation programs after acute inpatient care, consistent with the results of numerous observational studies. However, improved internal validity limits external validity and generalization. The absence of a significant association between TC rating and outcomes for the other ABI group most likely reflects the difficulty prescribing rehabilitation for this highly heterogeneous group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"38-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000993\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的采用准实验方法,进一步评估一项大型观察性研究(n = 2120)的随附报告中描述的脑损伤住院后康复结果:集中康复(IR:住院神经行为康复、住院神经康复、家庭和社区神经康复、日间治疗、门诊神经康复)和辅助生活(SL)项目的数据,这些项目为后天性脑损伤(ABI)患者提供服务:在倾向得分分析中,有 228 名脑外伤、中风或其他 ABI 患者;在按建议治疗完成程度(TC)评级分析中,有 1344 名患者:主要测量指标:性别、年龄、受伤后时间、马约-波特兰适应性量表-第 4 版(MPAI-4)Rasch 导出 T 分数和 TC 评级:设计:对(1)IR 和 SL 参与者倾向得分匹配样本的出院 MPAI-4 总分、指数和分量表 T 分进行协方差分析,控制入院得分;(2)按 TC 评级和诊断类别对 MPAI-4 T 分进行协方差分析:倾向得分匹配组显示,与 SL 参与者相比,IR 参与者的 MPAI-4 总 T 评分结果更优(F = 77.21,P 结论:IR 参与者的 MPAI-4 总 T 评分结果优于 SL 参与者的 MPAI-4 总 T 评分结果:这些使用准实验对照进行的分析提供了更加科学严谨的证据,证明在急性住院治疗后,通过院后脑损伤康复计划提供的 IR 有益,这与大量观察性研究的结果一致。然而,内部有效性的提高限制了外部有效性和普遍性。在其他 ABI 组别中,TC 评分与结果之间没有明显的关联,这很可能反映了为这一高度异质性的组别开具康复处方的难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcomes With Quasi-Experimental Controls.

Objective: To further evaluate, using quasi-experimental methodologies, posthospital brain injury rehabilitation outcomes described in an accompanying report of a large observational study ( n = 2120).

Setting: Data from Intensive Rehabilitation (IR: Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation) and Supported Living (SL) programs serving individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI).

Participants: Two hundred twenty-eight individuals with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other ABI in propensity score analysis; 1344 in analysis by extent of recommended treatment completed (TC) rating.

Main measures: Sex, age, time since injury, Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4th edition (MPAI-4) Rasch-derived T-scores, and TC rating.

Design: Analyses of covariance (1) of discharge MPAI-4 Total, index, and subscale T-scores on propensity score-matched samples of IR and SL participants controlling for admission scores and (2) of MPAI-4 T-scores by TC rating and diagnostic category.

Results: Propensity score-matched groups showed superior outcomes for IR participants compared to SL participants on MPAI-4 Total T-score ( F = 77.21, P < .001; partial η 2  = 0.257) and all MPAI-4 index and subscale T-scores controlling for sex, age, and baseline scores. Participants with traumatic brain injury and stroke who completed the recommended course of rehabilitation had superior outcomes on all MPAI-4 T-scores compared to those who completed less than or much less than the recommended treatment. No additional benefit was apparent for those who completed more than the recommended course. The association between TC rating and outcome was not significant for the other ABI group.

Conclusions: These analyses using quasi-experimental controls provide more scientifically rigorous evidence of the benefit of IR provided through posthospital brain injury rehabilitation programs after acute inpatient care, consistent with the results of numerous observational studies. However, improved internal validity limits external validity and generalization. The absence of a significant association between TC rating and outcomes for the other ABI group most likely reflects the difficulty prescribing rehabilitation for this highly heterogeneous group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信