关于在初级医疗中管理成人慢性非癌性疼痛的建议:系统性临床指南回顾。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Olena Mazurenko, Emer O'Brien, Anna Beug, Susan M Smith, Caroline McCarthy
{"title":"关于在初级医疗中管理成人慢性非癌性疼痛的建议:系统性临床指南回顾。","authors":"Olena Mazurenko, Emer O'Brien, Anna Beug, Susan M Smith, Caroline McCarthy","doi":"10.1111/jep.14118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a leading driver of disability. Primary care clinicians treat most patients with CNCP. Yet, they are often unable to identify appropriate pain treatments, mainly due to concerns about the safety and effectiveness of available medications. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can be useful tools to guide primary care clinicians in selecting pain treatments based on the best available evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To undertake a systematic review of CPGs that address the management of adults with CNCP, regardless of underlying condition type, in primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically reviewed and synthesised current CPGs for managing adults with CNCP in primary care (2013-2023). We followed a stepwise systematic process to synthesise key CPG recommendations: extracted and analysed each recommendation, synthesised by compiling similar recommendations using a thematic analysis approach, and assessed the strength of CPG recommendations to create a final, unified set of recommendations. We focused on identifying CPGs containing recommendations on the following topics: (a) opioid pain management, (b) non-opioid pharmacological pain management, (c) non-pharmacological pain management, and (d) patient-centred communication around pain management, prevention, and organisation of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13 CPGs, 8 of which focused solely on use of opioids, emphasising the lack of long-term effectiveness and safety concerns, being mainly based on the expert consensus. As an exception, high-quality evidence recommended referring patients with suspected opioid use disorder to specialist addiction services for medication-assisted treatment. Recommendations for non-opioid pain management were often contradictory and based on the expert consensus. Patient-centred pain management combined with exercise-based interventions and psychological therapies are appropriate strategies for managing patients with CNCP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most CPGs focused on opioid management, with contradictory recommendations for non-opioid management based on low-quality evidence. Additional research is needed to strengthen the evidence for using non-opioid and non-pharmacological interventions to manage patients with CNCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for managing adults with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: A systematic clinical guideline review.\",\"authors\":\"Olena Mazurenko, Emer O'Brien, Anna Beug, Susan M Smith, Caroline McCarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a leading driver of disability. Primary care clinicians treat most patients with CNCP. Yet, they are often unable to identify appropriate pain treatments, mainly due to concerns about the safety and effectiveness of available medications. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can be useful tools to guide primary care clinicians in selecting pain treatments based on the best available evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To undertake a systematic review of CPGs that address the management of adults with CNCP, regardless of underlying condition type, in primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically reviewed and synthesised current CPGs for managing adults with CNCP in primary care (2013-2023). We followed a stepwise systematic process to synthesise key CPG recommendations: extracted and analysed each recommendation, synthesised by compiling similar recommendations using a thematic analysis approach, and assessed the strength of CPG recommendations to create a final, unified set of recommendations. We focused on identifying CPGs containing recommendations on the following topics: (a) opioid pain management, (b) non-opioid pharmacological pain management, (c) non-pharmacological pain management, and (d) patient-centred communication around pain management, prevention, and organisation of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13 CPGs, 8 of which focused solely on use of opioids, emphasising the lack of long-term effectiveness and safety concerns, being mainly based on the expert consensus. As an exception, high-quality evidence recommended referring patients with suspected opioid use disorder to specialist addiction services for medication-assisted treatment. Recommendations for non-opioid pain management were often contradictory and based on the expert consensus. Patient-centred pain management combined with exercise-based interventions and psychological therapies are appropriate strategies for managing patients with CNCP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most CPGs focused on opioid management, with contradictory recommendations for non-opioid management based on low-quality evidence. Additional research is needed to strengthen the evidence for using non-opioid and non-pharmacological interventions to manage patients with CNCP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由慢性非癌性疼痛 (CNCP) 是导致残疾的主要原因。初级保健临床医生负责治疗大多数 CNCP 患者。然而,他们往往无法确定适当的疼痛治疗方法,这主要是由于对现有药物安全性和有效性的担忧。临床实践指南(CPG)是指导初级保健临床医生根据现有最佳证据选择疼痛治疗方法的有用工具:对初级保健中针对成人 CNCP(无论其基础疾病类型如何)患者管理的 CPG 进行系统性回顾:我们系统地回顾并综合了目前在初级医疗中管理成人 CNCP 患者的 CPG(2013-2023 年)。我们采用循序渐进的系统流程来综合关键的 CPG 建议:提取并分析每项建议,采用专题分析方法对类似建议进行汇编,并评估 CPG 建议的力度,最终形成一套统一的建议。我们重点确定了包含以下主题建议的 CPG:(a) 阿片类药物疼痛管理,(b) 非阿片类药物疼痛管理,(c) 非药物疼痛管理,以及 (d) 围绕疼痛管理、预防和护理组织的以患者为中心的沟通:我们纳入了 13 份 CPG,其中 8 份仅关注阿片类药物的使用,强调缺乏长期有效性和安全性问题,主要基于专家共识。作为例外,高质量的证据建议将疑似阿片类药物使用障碍的患者转诊至专科成瘾服务机构接受药物辅助治疗。关于非阿片类药物疼痛治疗的建议往往相互矛盾,且以专家共识为基础。以患者为中心的疼痛管理与运动干预和心理疗法相结合,是治疗 CNCP 患者的适当策略:大多数 CPGs 侧重于阿片类药物治疗,而基于低质量证据的非阿片类药物治疗建议则相互矛盾。需要开展更多研究,以加强使用非阿片类药物和非药物干预措施管理 CNCP 患者的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommendations for managing adults with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: A systematic clinical guideline review.

Rationale: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a leading driver of disability. Primary care clinicians treat most patients with CNCP. Yet, they are often unable to identify appropriate pain treatments, mainly due to concerns about the safety and effectiveness of available medications. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can be useful tools to guide primary care clinicians in selecting pain treatments based on the best available evidence.

Objectives: To undertake a systematic review of CPGs that address the management of adults with CNCP, regardless of underlying condition type, in primary care.

Method: We systematically reviewed and synthesised current CPGs for managing adults with CNCP in primary care (2013-2023). We followed a stepwise systematic process to synthesise key CPG recommendations: extracted and analysed each recommendation, synthesised by compiling similar recommendations using a thematic analysis approach, and assessed the strength of CPG recommendations to create a final, unified set of recommendations. We focused on identifying CPGs containing recommendations on the following topics: (a) opioid pain management, (b) non-opioid pharmacological pain management, (c) non-pharmacological pain management, and (d) patient-centred communication around pain management, prevention, and organisation of care.

Results: We included 13 CPGs, 8 of which focused solely on use of opioids, emphasising the lack of long-term effectiveness and safety concerns, being mainly based on the expert consensus. As an exception, high-quality evidence recommended referring patients with suspected opioid use disorder to specialist addiction services for medication-assisted treatment. Recommendations for non-opioid pain management were often contradictory and based on the expert consensus. Patient-centred pain management combined with exercise-based interventions and psychological therapies are appropriate strategies for managing patients with CNCP.

Conclusion: Most CPGs focused on opioid management, with contradictory recommendations for non-opioid management based on low-quality evidence. Additional research is needed to strengthen the evidence for using non-opioid and non-pharmacological interventions to manage patients with CNCP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信