脑淀粉样血管病的临床和神经影像前兆:波士顿标准 2.0 版的影响。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stefan Weidauer, Mona Tafreshi, Christian Förch, Elke Hattingen, Christophe T. Arendt, Lucie Friedauer
{"title":"脑淀粉样血管病的临床和神经影像前兆:波士顿标准 2.0 版的影响。","authors":"Stefan Weidauer,&nbsp;Mona Tafreshi,&nbsp;Christian Förch,&nbsp;Elke Hattingen,&nbsp;Christophe T. Arendt,&nbsp;Lucie Friedauer","doi":"10.1111/ene.16425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Although the Boston criteria version 2.0 facilitates the sensitivity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) diagnosis, there are only limited data about precursor symptoms. This study aimed to determine the impact of neurological and imaging features in relation to the time of CAA diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients diagnosed with probable CAA according to the Boston criteria version 1.5, treated between 2010 and 2020 in our neurocentre, were identified through a keyword search in our medical database. Neuroimaging was assessed using Boston criteria versions 1.5 and 2.0. Medical records with primary focus on the clinical course and the occurrence of transient focal neurological episodes were prospectively evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-eight out of 81 patients (46.9%) exhibited transient focal neurological episodes, most often sensory (13.2%) or aphasic disorders (13.2%), or permanent deficits at a mean time interval of 31.1 months (SD ±26.3; range 1–108 months) before diagnosis of probable CAA (Boston criteria version 1.5). If using Boston criteria version 2.0, all patients receiving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) met the criteria for probable CAA, and diagnosis could have been made on average 44 months earlier. Four patients were younger than 50 years, three of them with supporting pathology. Cognitive deficits were most common (34.6%) at the time of diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Non-haemorrhagic MRI markers enhance the sensitivity of diagnosing probable CAA; however, further prospective studies are proposed to establish a minimum age for inclusion. As the neurological overture of CAA may occur several years before clinical diagnosis, early clarification by MRI including haemosensitive sequences are suggested.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ene.16425","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and neuroimaging precursors in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: impact of the Boston criteria version 2.0\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Weidauer,&nbsp;Mona Tafreshi,&nbsp;Christian Förch,&nbsp;Elke Hattingen,&nbsp;Christophe T. Arendt,&nbsp;Lucie Friedauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ene.16425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although the Boston criteria version 2.0 facilitates the sensitivity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) diagnosis, there are only limited data about precursor symptoms. This study aimed to determine the impact of neurological and imaging features in relation to the time of CAA diagnosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients diagnosed with probable CAA according to the Boston criteria version 1.5, treated between 2010 and 2020 in our neurocentre, were identified through a keyword search in our medical database. Neuroimaging was assessed using Boston criteria versions 1.5 and 2.0. Medical records with primary focus on the clinical course and the occurrence of transient focal neurological episodes were prospectively evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-eight out of 81 patients (46.9%) exhibited transient focal neurological episodes, most often sensory (13.2%) or aphasic disorders (13.2%), or permanent deficits at a mean time interval of 31.1 months (SD ±26.3; range 1–108 months) before diagnosis of probable CAA (Boston criteria version 1.5). If using Boston criteria version 2.0, all patients receiving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) met the criteria for probable CAA, and diagnosis could have been made on average 44 months earlier. Four patients were younger than 50 years, three of them with supporting pathology. Cognitive deficits were most common (34.6%) at the time of diagnosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Non-haemorrhagic MRI markers enhance the sensitivity of diagnosing probable CAA; however, further prospective studies are proposed to establish a minimum age for inclusion. As the neurological overture of CAA may occur several years before clinical diagnosis, early clarification by MRI including haemosensitive sequences are suggested.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ene.16425\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.16425\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.16425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尽管波士顿标准2.0版提高了脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)诊断的敏感性,但有关前驱症状的数据却十分有限。本研究旨在确定神经学和影像学特征对 CAA 诊断时间的影响:根据波士顿标准 1.5 版诊断出可能患有 CAA 的患者,于 2010 年至 2020 年期间在我们的神经中心接受治疗。采用波士顿标准 1.5 版和 2.0 版对神经影像学进行评估。我们对病历进行了前瞻性评估,主要侧重于临床过程和短暂性局灶性神经病发作的发生情况:81名患者中有38名(46.9%)在诊断为可能的CAA(波士顿标准1.5版)前的平均时间间隔为31.1个月(SD ±26.3;范围1-108个月)出现短暂的局灶性神经发作,最常见的是感觉障碍(13.2%)或失语症(13.2%),或永久性障碍。如果使用波士顿标准 2.0 版,所有接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查的患者都符合疑似 CAA 的标准,平均可提前 44 个月确诊。四名患者的年龄小于 50 岁,其中三人有支持性病变。诊断时最常见的是认知障碍(34.6%):结论:非出血性磁共振成像标志物可提高诊断疑似 CAA 的灵敏度;但建议进一步开展前瞻性研究,以确定纳入的最低年龄。由于 CAA 的神经症状可能在临床诊断前数年就已出现,因此建议通过磁共振成像(包括对血液敏感的序列)及早明确诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical and neuroimaging precursors in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: impact of the Boston criteria version 2.0

Clinical and neuroimaging precursors in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: impact of the Boston criteria version 2.0

Background and purpose

Although the Boston criteria version 2.0 facilitates the sensitivity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) diagnosis, there are only limited data about precursor symptoms. This study aimed to determine the impact of neurological and imaging features in relation to the time of CAA diagnosis.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with probable CAA according to the Boston criteria version 1.5, treated between 2010 and 2020 in our neurocentre, were identified through a keyword search in our medical database. Neuroimaging was assessed using Boston criteria versions 1.5 and 2.0. Medical records with primary focus on the clinical course and the occurrence of transient focal neurological episodes were prospectively evaluated.

Results

Thirty-eight out of 81 patients (46.9%) exhibited transient focal neurological episodes, most often sensory (13.2%) or aphasic disorders (13.2%), or permanent deficits at a mean time interval of 31.1 months (SD ±26.3; range 1–108 months) before diagnosis of probable CAA (Boston criteria version 1.5). If using Boston criteria version 2.0, all patients receiving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) met the criteria for probable CAA, and diagnosis could have been made on average 44 months earlier. Four patients were younger than 50 years, three of them with supporting pathology. Cognitive deficits were most common (34.6%) at the time of diagnosis.

Conclusions

Non-haemorrhagic MRI markers enhance the sensitivity of diagnosing probable CAA; however, further prospective studies are proposed to establish a minimum age for inclusion. As the neurological overture of CAA may occur several years before clinical diagnosis, early clarification by MRI including haemosensitive sequences are suggested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neurology
European Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信