年轻的复发性肩关节脱位患者在关节镜下进行Bankart修复术后的长期失败率很高:呼吁尽早治疗。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Cristina Delgado, Elena Calvo, Natalia Martínez-Catalán, Maria Valencia, Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, Emilio Calvo
{"title":"年轻的复发性肩关节脱位患者在关节镜下进行Bankart修复术后的长期失败率很高:呼吁尽早治疗。","authors":"Cristina Delgado, Elena Calvo, Natalia Martínez-Catalán, Maria Valencia, Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, Emilio Calvo","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine arthroscopic Bankart repair outcomes and recurrence risk factors at a minimum 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective assessment of prospectively collected data, single-cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Demographical and preoperative instability features were collected. Primary outcome was recurrent instability set as dislocation or subluxation. Secondary outcomes were revision surgery, postoperative instability degree according to Manta criteria, objective and subjective clinical and functional status, assessed by the Rowe, Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) scores. Return to sport and postoperative sports activity at the final follow-up were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and seventy-two patients, 82% men, average age at surgery 29.5 ± 9.2 years, were included. At a mean follow-up of 8.3 ± 2.6 years, recurrent instability occurred in 53 of 172 patients (30.8%). Revision surgery was required in 23/53 (43.4%) of shoulder with recurrent instability. Recurrence occurred within the first 2 years postoperative in 49% of the shoulders, whereas 51% of recurrences occurred after this period. Recurrence took place after a traumatic event in 25% and 56%, respectively. Recurrence rates were higher in patients who underwent surgery after two or more dislocations (p = 0.029). Patients younger at the time of first dislocation, younger at surgery and those with a higher preoperative degree of instability also showed significantly higher rates of recurrence (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, p = 0.03). Postoperative ROWE, WOSI and SSV scores were significantly worse in patients with recurrent instability (p < 0.001). Return-to-sports rate was also lower in patients with postoperative recurrence (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The arthroscopic Bankart repair was associated with a high long-term recurrence rate, and its effectiveness decreased over time. The lowest recurrence rates in arthroscopic Bankart repair were achieved in older patients with only one prior instability episode and a lower instability degree.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High long-term failure rates after arthroscopic Bankart repair in younger patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations: A plea for early treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Delgado, Elena Calvo, Natalia Martínez-Catalán, Maria Valencia, Gonzalo Luengo-Alonso, Emilio Calvo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine arthroscopic Bankart repair outcomes and recurrence risk factors at a minimum 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective assessment of prospectively collected data, single-cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Demographical and preoperative instability features were collected. Primary outcome was recurrent instability set as dislocation or subluxation. Secondary outcomes were revision surgery, postoperative instability degree according to Manta criteria, objective and subjective clinical and functional status, assessed by the Rowe, Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) scores. Return to sport and postoperative sports activity at the final follow-up were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and seventy-two patients, 82% men, average age at surgery 29.5 ± 9.2 years, were included. At a mean follow-up of 8.3 ± 2.6 years, recurrent instability occurred in 53 of 172 patients (30.8%). Revision surgery was required in 23/53 (43.4%) of shoulder with recurrent instability. Recurrence occurred within the first 2 years postoperative in 49% of the shoulders, whereas 51% of recurrences occurred after this period. Recurrence took place after a traumatic event in 25% and 56%, respectively. Recurrence rates were higher in patients who underwent surgery after two or more dislocations (p = 0.029). Patients younger at the time of first dislocation, younger at surgery and those with a higher preoperative degree of instability also showed significantly higher rates of recurrence (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, p = 0.03). Postoperative ROWE, WOSI and SSV scores were significantly worse in patients with recurrent instability (p < 0.001). Return-to-sports rate was also lower in patients with postoperative recurrence (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The arthroscopic Bankart repair was associated with a high long-term recurrence rate, and its effectiveness decreased over time. The lowest recurrence rates in arthroscopic Bankart repair were achieved in older patients with only one prior instability episode and a lower instability degree.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定关节镜下 Bankart 修复术的疗效和至少 5 年随访的复发风险因素:方法:对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性评估,对接受关节镜下Bankart修复术且至少随访5年的患者进行单队列研究。研究收集了患者的人口统计学特征和术前不稳定性特征。主要结果为复发性不稳定,即脱位或半脱位。次要结果是翻修手术、术后不稳定程度(根据Manta标准)、客观和主观临床和功能状态(通过Rowe、西安大略省肩关节指数(WOSI)和主观肩关节价值(SSV)评分进行评估)。此外,还记录了最终随访时的运动恢复情况和术后运动量:共纳入172名患者,82%为男性,手术时平均年龄为(29.5 ± 9.2)岁。在平均 8.3 ± 2.6 年的随访中,172 例患者中有 53 例(30.8%)出现复发性不稳定。23/53(43.4%)例肩关节复发性不稳定患者需要进行翻修手术。49%的肩关节在术后两年内复发,而51%的复发发生在术后两年之后。分别有25%和56%的复发发生在创伤事件之后。两次或两次以上脱位后接受手术的患者复发率更高(P = 0.029)。首次脱位时年龄较小、手术时年龄较小以及术前不稳定程度较高的患者复发率也明显较高(p = 0.04、p = 0.02、p = 0.03)。复发性不稳定患者的术后 ROWE、WOSI 和 SSV 评分明显降低(p 结论:Bankart 修复术的复发率较高:关节镜下Bankart修复术的长期复发率较高,其有效性随时间推移而降低。在关节镜下进行Bankart修复术的复发率最低的是年龄较大、之前只有一次不稳定发作且不稳定程度较低的患者:证据等级:IV级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High long-term failure rates after arthroscopic Bankart repair in younger patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations: A plea for early treatment.

Purpose: To determine arthroscopic Bankart repair outcomes and recurrence risk factors at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Methods: Retrospective assessment of prospectively collected data, single-cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Demographical and preoperative instability features were collected. Primary outcome was recurrent instability set as dislocation or subluxation. Secondary outcomes were revision surgery, postoperative instability degree according to Manta criteria, objective and subjective clinical and functional status, assessed by the Rowe, Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) scores. Return to sport and postoperative sports activity at the final follow-up were also recorded.

Results: One-hundred and seventy-two patients, 82% men, average age at surgery 29.5 ± 9.2 years, were included. At a mean follow-up of 8.3 ± 2.6 years, recurrent instability occurred in 53 of 172 patients (30.8%). Revision surgery was required in 23/53 (43.4%) of shoulder with recurrent instability. Recurrence occurred within the first 2 years postoperative in 49% of the shoulders, whereas 51% of recurrences occurred after this period. Recurrence took place after a traumatic event in 25% and 56%, respectively. Recurrence rates were higher in patients who underwent surgery after two or more dislocations (p = 0.029). Patients younger at the time of first dislocation, younger at surgery and those with a higher preoperative degree of instability also showed significantly higher rates of recurrence (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, p = 0.03). Postoperative ROWE, WOSI and SSV scores were significantly worse in patients with recurrent instability (p < 0.001). Return-to-sports rate was also lower in patients with postoperative recurrence (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The arthroscopic Bankart repair was associated with a high long-term recurrence rate, and its effectiveness decreased over time. The lowest recurrence rates in arthroscopic Bankart repair were achieved in older patients with only one prior instability episode and a lower instability degree.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信