原发性免疫缺陷患者使用皮下注射免疫球蛋白辅助疗法的经历:前瞻性观察队列。

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Ezgi Yalcin Gungoren, Melek Yorgun Altunbas, Ummugulsum Dikici, Zeynep Meric, Isil Eser Simsek, Ayca Kiykim, Salim Can, Esra Karabiber, Nalan Yakici, Fazil Orhan, Haluk Cokugras, Metin Aydogan, Oner Ozdemir, Sevgi Bilgic Eltan, Safa Baris, Ahmet Ozen, Elif Karakoc-Aydiner
{"title":"原发性免疫缺陷患者使用皮下注射免疫球蛋白辅助疗法的经历:前瞻性观察队列。","authors":"Ezgi Yalcin Gungoren, Melek Yorgun Altunbas, Ummugulsum Dikici, Zeynep Meric, Isil Eser Simsek, Ayca Kiykim, Salim Can, Esra Karabiber, Nalan Yakici, Fazil Orhan, Haluk Cokugras, Metin Aydogan, Oner Ozdemir, Sevgi Bilgic Eltan, Safa Baris, Ahmet Ozen, Elif Karakoc-Aydiner","doi":"10.1007/s10875-024-01771-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunoglobulin G replacement therapy (IgRT), intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) routes, is pivotal in treatment of primary immunodeficiencies (PID). In recent years, facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG), a combination of rHuPH20 and 10% IgG has emerged as a delivery method to combine advantages of both IV and SC.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In an observational prospective cohort, we investigated patient experience with fSCIG in PID patients from 5 PID centers for up to 12 months. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this treatment with patient/caregiver- and physician-reported indicators. Additionally, we analyzed patient treatment satisfaction (TSQM-9) and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 29 patients (22 pediatric and 7 adults; 14 females and 15 males; (median: 15, min-max: 2-40.9 years) who initiated fSCIG as IgRT-naive (n = 1), switched from conventional rapid-push 10% SCIG (n = 6) or IVIG (n = 22). Among the participants, 19 (65%) exhibited antibody deficiencies, 8 (27%) combined immunodeficiencies, and 2 (7%) immune dysregulations. Remarkably, targeted trough immunoglobulin G levels were achieved under all previous IgRTs as well as fSCIG. No severe systemic adverse drug reactions were documented, despite prevalent local (%86.45) and mild systemic (%26.45) adverse reactions were noted with fSCIG. Due to mild systemic symptoms, 2 patients switched from fSCIG to 10% SCIG. The patient satisfaction survey revealed a notable increase at 2-4th (p = 0.102); 5-8th (p = 0.006) and 9-12th (p < 0.001) months compared to the baseline. No significant trends were observed in QoL surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>fSCIG demonstrates admissable tolerability and efficacy in managing PIDs in addition to notable increase of patients' drug satisfaction with IgRT. The identified benefits support the continuation of this therapy despite the local reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","volume":"44 8","pages":"169"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights into Patient Experiences with Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Primary Immune Deficiency: A Prospective Observational Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Ezgi Yalcin Gungoren, Melek Yorgun Altunbas, Ummugulsum Dikici, Zeynep Meric, Isil Eser Simsek, Ayca Kiykim, Salim Can, Esra Karabiber, Nalan Yakici, Fazil Orhan, Haluk Cokugras, Metin Aydogan, Oner Ozdemir, Sevgi Bilgic Eltan, Safa Baris, Ahmet Ozen, Elif Karakoc-Aydiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10875-024-01771-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunoglobulin G replacement therapy (IgRT), intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) routes, is pivotal in treatment of primary immunodeficiencies (PID). In recent years, facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG), a combination of rHuPH20 and 10% IgG has emerged as a delivery method to combine advantages of both IV and SC.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In an observational prospective cohort, we investigated patient experience with fSCIG in PID patients from 5 PID centers for up to 12 months. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this treatment with patient/caregiver- and physician-reported indicators. Additionally, we analyzed patient treatment satisfaction (TSQM-9) and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 29 patients (22 pediatric and 7 adults; 14 females and 15 males; (median: 15, min-max: 2-40.9 years) who initiated fSCIG as IgRT-naive (n = 1), switched from conventional rapid-push 10% SCIG (n = 6) or IVIG (n = 22). Among the participants, 19 (65%) exhibited antibody deficiencies, 8 (27%) combined immunodeficiencies, and 2 (7%) immune dysregulations. Remarkably, targeted trough immunoglobulin G levels were achieved under all previous IgRTs as well as fSCIG. No severe systemic adverse drug reactions were documented, despite prevalent local (%86.45) and mild systemic (%26.45) adverse reactions were noted with fSCIG. Due to mild systemic symptoms, 2 patients switched from fSCIG to 10% SCIG. The patient satisfaction survey revealed a notable increase at 2-4th (p = 0.102); 5-8th (p = 0.006) and 9-12th (p < 0.001) months compared to the baseline. No significant trends were observed in QoL surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>fSCIG demonstrates admissable tolerability and efficacy in managing PIDs in addition to notable increase of patients' drug satisfaction with IgRT. The identified benefits support the continuation of this therapy despite the local reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\"44 8\",\"pages\":\"169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298503/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-024-01771-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-024-01771-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫球蛋白G替代疗法(IgRT),包括静脉注射(IV)和皮下注射(SC)两种途径,是治疗原发性免疫缺陷症(PID)的关键。近年来,由rHuPH20和10% IgG组合而成的促进皮下免疫球蛋白(fSCIG)已成为一种结合静脉注射和皮下注射优点的给药方法:在一项前瞻性队列观察中,我们调查了来自 5 个 PID 中心的 PID 患者使用 fSCIG 长达 12 个月的经验。我们通过患者/护理人员和医生报告的指标评估了该疗法的疗效和安全性。此外,我们还分析了患者的治疗满意度(TSQM-9)和生活质量(QoL):我们共招募了 29 名患者(22 名儿童和 7 名成人;14 名女性和 15 名男性;(中位数:15 岁,最小-最大值:2-40.9 岁),他们开始使用 fSCIG 时均为 IgRT-naive(n = 1),从传统的快速推注 10%SCIG(n = 6)或 IVIG(n = 22)转换而来。参与者中有 19 人(65%)表现出抗体缺乏,8 人(27%)表现出合并免疫缺陷,2 人(7%)表现出免疫失调。值得注意的是,以往所有的 IgRT 和 fSCIG 均能达到目标谷值免疫球蛋白 G 水平。尽管使用 fSCIG 时普遍存在局部不良反应(86.45%)和轻度全身不良反应(26.45%),但未发现严重的全身性药物不良反应。由于出现轻微的全身症状,2 名患者从 fSCIG 改用了 10% SCIG。患者满意度调查显示,第 2-4 次(p = 0.102)、第 5-8 次(p = 0.006)和第 9-12 次(p 结论:fSCIG 在治疗 PID 方面具有可接受的耐受性和疗效,而且患者对 IgRT 的药物满意度显著提高。尽管存在局部反应,但已确定的益处支持继续使用这种疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Insights into Patient Experiences with Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Primary Immune Deficiency: A Prospective Observational Cohort.

Insights into Patient Experiences with Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Primary Immune Deficiency: A Prospective Observational Cohort.

Background: Immunoglobulin G replacement therapy (IgRT), intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) routes, is pivotal in treatment of primary immunodeficiencies (PID). In recent years, facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG), a combination of rHuPH20 and 10% IgG has emerged as a delivery method to combine advantages of both IV and SC.

Method: In an observational prospective cohort, we investigated patient experience with fSCIG in PID patients from 5 PID centers for up to 12 months. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this treatment with patient/caregiver- and physician-reported indicators. Additionally, we analyzed patient treatment satisfaction (TSQM-9) and quality of life (QoL).

Results: We enrolled 29 patients (22 pediatric and 7 adults; 14 females and 15 males; (median: 15, min-max: 2-40.9 years) who initiated fSCIG as IgRT-naive (n = 1), switched from conventional rapid-push 10% SCIG (n = 6) or IVIG (n = 22). Among the participants, 19 (65%) exhibited antibody deficiencies, 8 (27%) combined immunodeficiencies, and 2 (7%) immune dysregulations. Remarkably, targeted trough immunoglobulin G levels were achieved under all previous IgRTs as well as fSCIG. No severe systemic adverse drug reactions were documented, despite prevalent local (%86.45) and mild systemic (%26.45) adverse reactions were noted with fSCIG. Due to mild systemic symptoms, 2 patients switched from fSCIG to 10% SCIG. The patient satisfaction survey revealed a notable increase at 2-4th (p = 0.102); 5-8th (p = 0.006) and 9-12th (p < 0.001) months compared to the baseline. No significant trends were observed in QoL surveys.

Conclusion: fSCIG demonstrates admissable tolerability and efficacy in managing PIDs in addition to notable increase of patients' drug satisfaction with IgRT. The identified benefits support the continuation of this therapy despite the local reactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
9.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Immunology publishes impactful papers in the realm of human immunology, delving into the diagnosis, pathogenesis, prognosis, or treatment of human diseases. The journal places particular emphasis on primary immunodeficiencies and related diseases, encompassing inborn errors of immunity in a broad sense, their underlying genotypes, and diverse phenotypes. These phenotypes include infection, malignancy, allergy, auto-inflammation, and autoimmunity. We welcome a broad spectrum of studies in this domain, spanning genetic discovery, clinical description, immunologic assessment, diagnostic approaches, prognosis evaluation, and treatment interventions. Case reports are considered if they are genuinely original and accompanied by a concise review of the relevant medical literature, illustrating how the novel case study advances the field. The instructions to authors provide detailed guidance on the four categories of papers accepted by the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信