创伤性脊髓损伤的节段运动结果预测:超越总分的进步。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
{"title":"创伤性脊髓损伤的节段运动结果预测:超越总分的进步。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.114905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Neurological and functional recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is highly challenged by the level of the lesion and the high heterogeneity in severity (different degrees of in/complete SCI) and spinal cord syndromes (hemi-, ant-, central-, and posterior cord). So far outcome predictions in clinical trials are limited in targeting sum motor scores of the upper (UEMS) and lower limb (LEMS) while neglecting that the distribution of motor function is essential for functional outcomes. The development of data-driven prediction models of detailed segmental motor recovery for all spinal segments from the level of lesion towards the lowest motor segments will improve the design of rehabilitation programs and the sensitivity of clinical trials.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study used acute-phase International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI exams to forecast 6-month recovery of segmental motor scores as the primary evaluation endpoint. Secondary endpoints included severity grade improvement, independent walking, and self-care ability. Different similarity metrics were explored for k-nearest neighbor (kNN) matching within 1267 patients from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury before validation in 411 patients from the Sygen trial. The kNN performance was compared to linear and logistic regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We obtained a population-wide root-mean-squared error (RMSE) in motor score sequence of 0.76(0.14, 2.77) and competitive functional score predictions (AUC<sub>walker</sub> = 0.92, AUC<sub>self-carer</sub> = 0.83) for the kNN algorithm, improving beyond the linear regression task (RMSE<sub>linear</sub> = 0.98(0.22, 2.57)). The validation cohort showed comparable results (RMSE = 0.75(0.13, 2.57), AUC<sub>walker</sub> = 0.92). We deploy the final historic control model as a web tool for easy user interaction (<span><span>https://hicsci.ethz.ch/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Our approach is the first to provide predictions across all motor segments independent of the level and severity of SCI. We provide a machine learning concept that is highly interpretable, i.e. the prediction formation process is transparent, that has been validated across European and American data sets, and provides reliable and validated algorithms to incorporate external control data to increase sensitivity and feasibility of multinational clinical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12246,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488624002310/pdfft?md5=8701ffd4c042068c4f69030561172100&pid=1-s2.0-S0014488624002310-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of segmental motor outcomes in traumatic spinal cord injury: Advances beyond sum scores\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.114905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Neurological and functional recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is highly challenged by the level of the lesion and the high heterogeneity in severity (different degrees of in/complete SCI) and spinal cord syndromes (hemi-, ant-, central-, and posterior cord). So far outcome predictions in clinical trials are limited in targeting sum motor scores of the upper (UEMS) and lower limb (LEMS) while neglecting that the distribution of motor function is essential for functional outcomes. The development of data-driven prediction models of detailed segmental motor recovery for all spinal segments from the level of lesion towards the lowest motor segments will improve the design of rehabilitation programs and the sensitivity of clinical trials.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study used acute-phase International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI exams to forecast 6-month recovery of segmental motor scores as the primary evaluation endpoint. Secondary endpoints included severity grade improvement, independent walking, and self-care ability. Different similarity metrics were explored for k-nearest neighbor (kNN) matching within 1267 patients from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury before validation in 411 patients from the Sygen trial. The kNN performance was compared to linear and logistic regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We obtained a population-wide root-mean-squared error (RMSE) in motor score sequence of 0.76(0.14, 2.77) and competitive functional score predictions (AUC<sub>walker</sub> = 0.92, AUC<sub>self-carer</sub> = 0.83) for the kNN algorithm, improving beyond the linear regression task (RMSE<sub>linear</sub> = 0.98(0.22, 2.57)). The validation cohort showed comparable results (RMSE = 0.75(0.13, 2.57), AUC<sub>walker</sub> = 0.92). We deploy the final historic control model as a web tool for easy user interaction (<span><span>https://hicsci.ethz.ch/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Our approach is the first to provide predictions across all motor segments independent of the level and severity of SCI. We provide a machine learning concept that is highly interpretable, i.e. the prediction formation process is transparent, that has been validated across European and American data sets, and provides reliable and validated algorithms to incorporate external control data to increase sensitivity and feasibility of multinational clinical trials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488624002310/pdfft?md5=8701ffd4c042068c4f69030561172100&pid=1-s2.0-S0014488624002310-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488624002310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488624002310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:外伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)后的神经和功能恢复因损伤程度、严重程度的高度异质性(不同程度的内/完全性 SCI)和脊髓综合征(半脊髓、前脊髓、中央脊髓和后脊髓)而面临巨大挑战。迄今为止,临床试验的结果预测仅限于上肢(UEMS)和下肢(LEMS)的运动总分,而忽视了运动功能的分布对功能结果的重要性。开发数据驱动的预测模型,预测从病变水平到最低运动节段的所有脊柱节段的详细节段运动恢复情况,将改善康复计划的设计和临床试验的敏感性:本研究采用国际 SCI 神经系统分类标准急性期检查来预测 6 个月的节段运动评分恢复情况,作为主要评估终点。次要终点包括严重程度等级改善、独立行走和自理能力。在对 Sygen 试验中的 411 名患者进行验证之前,对欧洲脊髓损伤多中心研究中 1267 名患者的 k 近邻(kNN)匹配进行了不同相似度指标的探索。我们将 kNN 的性能与线性回归模型和逻辑回归模型进行了比较:我们发现,kNN 算法在运动评分序列中的全人群均方根误差(RMSE)为 0.76(0.14, 2.77),在功能评分预测中的竞争力(AUCwalker = 0.92, AUCself-carer = 0.83)为 0.76(0.14, 2.77),比线性回归任务(RMSElinear = 0.98(0.22, 2.57))有所提高。验证队列显示了类似的结果(RMSE = 0.75(0.13, 2.57),AUCwalker = 0.92)。我们将最终的历史控制模型作为网络工具进行部署,以方便用户互动(https://hicsci.ethz.ch/):我们的方法是首个不受 SCI 水平和严重程度影响,对所有运动节段进行预测的方法。我们提供的机器学习概念具有很高的可解释性,即预测的形成过程是透明的,已在欧洲和美国的数据集中得到验证,并提供了可靠且经过验证的算法,可将外部控制数据纳入其中,以提高跨国临床试验的灵敏度和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of segmental motor outcomes in traumatic spinal cord injury: Advances beyond sum scores

Background and objectives

Neurological and functional recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is highly challenged by the level of the lesion and the high heterogeneity in severity (different degrees of in/complete SCI) and spinal cord syndromes (hemi-, ant-, central-, and posterior cord). So far outcome predictions in clinical trials are limited in targeting sum motor scores of the upper (UEMS) and lower limb (LEMS) while neglecting that the distribution of motor function is essential for functional outcomes. The development of data-driven prediction models of detailed segmental motor recovery for all spinal segments from the level of lesion towards the lowest motor segments will improve the design of rehabilitation programs and the sensitivity of clinical trials.

Methods

This study used acute-phase International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI exams to forecast 6-month recovery of segmental motor scores as the primary evaluation endpoint. Secondary endpoints included severity grade improvement, independent walking, and self-care ability. Different similarity metrics were explored for k-nearest neighbor (kNN) matching within 1267 patients from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury before validation in 411 patients from the Sygen trial. The kNN performance was compared to linear and logistic regression models.

Results

We obtained a population-wide root-mean-squared error (RMSE) in motor score sequence of 0.76(0.14, 2.77) and competitive functional score predictions (AUCwalker = 0.92, AUCself-carer = 0.83) for the kNN algorithm, improving beyond the linear regression task (RMSElinear = 0.98(0.22, 2.57)). The validation cohort showed comparable results (RMSE = 0.75(0.13, 2.57), AUCwalker = 0.92). We deploy the final historic control model as a web tool for easy user interaction (https://hicsci.ethz.ch/).

Discussion

Our approach is the first to provide predictions across all motor segments independent of the level and severity of SCI. We provide a machine learning concept that is highly interpretable, i.e. the prediction formation process is transparent, that has been validated across European and American data sets, and provides reliable and validated algorithms to incorporate external control data to increase sensitivity and feasibility of multinational clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Neurology
Experimental Neurology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
258
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Experimental Neurology, a Journal of Neuroscience Research, publishes original research in neuroscience with a particular emphasis on novel findings in neural development, regeneration, plasticity and transplantation. The journal has focused on research concerning basic mechanisms underlying neurological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信