疑似非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者入院前使用肝素。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jonas Sundermeyer, Alina Schock, Caroline Kellner, Paul M Haller, Jonas Lehmacher, Niklas Thießen, Betül Toprak, Lea Scharlemann, Raphael Twerenbold, Nils Arne Sörensen, Peter Clemmensen, Johannes T Neumann
{"title":"疑似非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者入院前使用肝素。","authors":"Jonas Sundermeyer, Alina Schock, Caroline Kellner, Paul M Haller, Jonas Lehmacher, Niklas Thießen, Betül Toprak, Lea Scharlemann, Raphael Twerenbold, Nils Arne Sörensen, Peter Clemmensen, Johannes T Neumann","doi":"10.1007/s00392-024-02507-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence supporting pre-hospital heparin administration in patients with suspected non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is lacking. We aim to evaluate if pre-hospital heparin administration by emergency medical service improves clinical outcome in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with suspected myocardial infarction (MI) presenting to the emergency department were prospectively enrolled from 2013 to 2021, excluding those with ST segment elevation MI. Patients with and without prehospital heparin administration were compared using propensity score matching. To assess the association between pre-hospital heparin loading, 30-day and 1-year mortality, Kaplan-Meier estimations and Cox regression models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,234 patients, median age was 69 years, 755 (61.2%) were male, 867 (70.5%) with known hypertension, 177 (14.4%) had diabetes, 280 (23.1%) were current smokers, and 444 (36.0%) had a history of CAD. Compared to patients without pre-hospital heparin administration, heparin pre-treated patients were more often active smokers (26.5% vs. 20.8%). After propensity matching, 475 patients with vs. without pre-hospital heparin administration were compared, with no significant difference in 30-day mortality (no-heparin 1.3% vs. heparin 0.4%) and 1-year mortality (no-heparin 7.2% vs. heparin 5.5%, adjusted HR 0.98, CI 0.95-1.01, p = 0.22). Bleeding events occurred at a low frequency (< 2%) and did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, pre-hospital heparin administration was not associated with improved clinical outcome in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS. These findings question pre-hospital heparin therapy in this patient population and might potentially warrant a more restricted utilization pending in-hospital risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-hospital admission of heparin in patients with suspected non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Sundermeyer, Alina Schock, Caroline Kellner, Paul M Haller, Jonas Lehmacher, Niklas Thießen, Betül Toprak, Lea Scharlemann, Raphael Twerenbold, Nils Arne Sörensen, Peter Clemmensen, Johannes T Neumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00392-024-02507-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence supporting pre-hospital heparin administration in patients with suspected non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is lacking. We aim to evaluate if pre-hospital heparin administration by emergency medical service improves clinical outcome in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with suspected myocardial infarction (MI) presenting to the emergency department were prospectively enrolled from 2013 to 2021, excluding those with ST segment elevation MI. Patients with and without prehospital heparin administration were compared using propensity score matching. To assess the association between pre-hospital heparin loading, 30-day and 1-year mortality, Kaplan-Meier estimations and Cox regression models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,234 patients, median age was 69 years, 755 (61.2%) were male, 867 (70.5%) with known hypertension, 177 (14.4%) had diabetes, 280 (23.1%) were current smokers, and 444 (36.0%) had a history of CAD. Compared to patients without pre-hospital heparin administration, heparin pre-treated patients were more often active smokers (26.5% vs. 20.8%). After propensity matching, 475 patients with vs. without pre-hospital heparin administration were compared, with no significant difference in 30-day mortality (no-heparin 1.3% vs. heparin 0.4%) and 1-year mortality (no-heparin 7.2% vs. heparin 5.5%, adjusted HR 0.98, CI 0.95-1.01, p = 0.22). Bleeding events occurred at a low frequency (< 2%) and did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, pre-hospital heparin administration was not associated with improved clinical outcome in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS. These findings question pre-hospital heparin therapy in this patient population and might potentially warrant a more restricted utilization pending in-hospital risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02507-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02507-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于疑似非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者,缺乏支持院前肝素应用的证据。我们的目的是评估急诊医疗服务在院前使用肝素是否能改善疑似 NSTE-ACS 患者的临床预后:2013年至2021年期间,我们对急诊科的疑似心肌梗死(MI)患者进行了前瞻性研究,其中不包括ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者。采用倾向评分匹配法对使用和未使用院前肝素的患者进行比较。为了评估院前肝素负荷、30天和1年死亡率之间的关系,采用了Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox回归模型:在1234名患者中,中位年龄为69岁,755人(61.2%)为男性,867人(70.5%)已知患有高血压,177人(14.4%)患有糖尿病,280人(23.1%)目前吸烟,444人(36.0%)有CAD病史。与未在院前使用肝素的患者相比,接受过肝素预处理的患者更多地吸烟(26.5% 对 20.8%)。经过倾向性匹配后,475 名接受和未接受院前肝素治疗的患者进行了比较,结果显示,30 天死亡率(未接受肝素治疗的患者为 1.3%,接受肝素治疗的患者为 0.4%)和 1 年死亡率(未接受肝素治疗的患者为 7.2%,接受肝素治疗的患者为 5.5%,调整后 HR 为 0.98,CI 为 0.95-1.01,P = 0.22)无显著差异。出血事件发生的频率很低(结论:院前肝素治疗是一种有效的治疗方法:在这项研究中,院前肝素给药与疑似 NSTE-ACS 患者临床预后的改善无关。这些研究结果对院前肝素治疗在这类患者中的应用提出了质疑,在进行院内风险评估之前,院前肝素的使用可能会受到更多限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pre-hospital admission of heparin in patients with suspected non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Pre-hospital admission of heparin in patients with suspected non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Background: Evidence supporting pre-hospital heparin administration in patients with suspected non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is lacking. We aim to evaluate if pre-hospital heparin administration by emergency medical service improves clinical outcome in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS.

Methods: Patients with suspected myocardial infarction (MI) presenting to the emergency department were prospectively enrolled from 2013 to 2021, excluding those with ST segment elevation MI. Patients with and without prehospital heparin administration were compared using propensity score matching. To assess the association between pre-hospital heparin loading, 30-day and 1-year mortality, Kaplan-Meier estimations and Cox regression models were used.

Results: Among 1,234 patients, median age was 69 years, 755 (61.2%) were male, 867 (70.5%) with known hypertension, 177 (14.4%) had diabetes, 280 (23.1%) were current smokers, and 444 (36.0%) had a history of CAD. Compared to patients without pre-hospital heparin administration, heparin pre-treated patients were more often active smokers (26.5% vs. 20.8%). After propensity matching, 475 patients with vs. without pre-hospital heparin administration were compared, with no significant difference in 30-day mortality (no-heparin 1.3% vs. heparin 0.4%) and 1-year mortality (no-heparin 7.2% vs. heparin 5.5%, adjusted HR 0.98, CI 0.95-1.01, p = 0.22). Bleeding events occurred at a low frequency (< 2%) and did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: In this study, pre-hospital heparin administration was not associated with improved clinical outcome in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS. These findings question pre-hospital heparin therapy in this patient population and might potentially warrant a more restricted utilization pending in-hospital risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信