Joseph Kletzer , Tim Berger , Pauline Domin , Christopher L. Schlett , Stoyan Kondov , Albi Fagu , Matthias Eschenhagen , Martin Czerny , Bartosz Rylski , Maximilian Kreibich
{"title":"降主动脉夹层胸腔内血管主动脉修补术后的升支几何形状。","authors":"Joseph Kletzer , Tim Berger , Pauline Domin , Christopher L. Schlett , Stoyan Kondov , Albi Fagu , Matthias Eschenhagen , Martin Czerny , Bartosz Rylski , Maximilian Kreibich","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to assess geometry changes of the ascending aorta after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending aortic dissection and identify potential risk factors for diameter and length change.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between April 2009 and July 2021, 102 patients were treated for acute descending aortic dissections (type B and non-A non-B) with TEVAR and were included in this analysis. Computed tomography angiographic scans were transferred to a dedicated imaging software and detailed aortic measurements (including length, diameter and area) were taken in multiplanar reconstruction postoperatively, after 6 months and annually thereafter.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-five (58%) patients were male, with a mean age of 66 (±11). Four (4%) patients were diagnosed with connective tissue disease. Before TEVAR, 79% of our patients were treated with a mean of 1.5 (±1.2) different classes of antihypertensive medications. This number rose to 98% after TEVAR and 2.7 (±1.0) different antihypertensive drugs. There was no significant change in length, diameter, cross-sectional area, or volume of the ascending aorta during the follow-up of 3 years after TEVAR. Body height was a negative predictor for mean ascending aortic diameter (<em>P</em> value = −0.013; B = −8.890) and mean aortic diameter at the level of the brachiocephalic trunk (<em>P</em> value = 0.039; B = −14.763).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our data suggest no significant changes in the ascending aorta following TEVAR of the descending thoracic aorta during mid-term follow-up when under stringent blood pressure medication. Additionally, we did not find any modifiable risk factors for geometry parameter increase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624004977/pdfft?md5=eda66e58adfcc64e1b7558b780cb5452&pid=1-s2.0-S0890509624004977-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ascending Geometry After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Descending Aortic Dissection\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Kletzer , Tim Berger , Pauline Domin , Christopher L. Schlett , Stoyan Kondov , Albi Fagu , Matthias Eschenhagen , Martin Czerny , Bartosz Rylski , Maximilian Kreibich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to assess geometry changes of the ascending aorta after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending aortic dissection and identify potential risk factors for diameter and length change.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between April 2009 and July 2021, 102 patients were treated for acute descending aortic dissections (type B and non-A non-B) with TEVAR and were included in this analysis. Computed tomography angiographic scans were transferred to a dedicated imaging software and detailed aortic measurements (including length, diameter and area) were taken in multiplanar reconstruction postoperatively, after 6 months and annually thereafter.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-five (58%) patients were male, with a mean age of 66 (±11). Four (4%) patients were diagnosed with connective tissue disease. Before TEVAR, 79% of our patients were treated with a mean of 1.5 (±1.2) different classes of antihypertensive medications. This number rose to 98% after TEVAR and 2.7 (±1.0) different antihypertensive drugs. There was no significant change in length, diameter, cross-sectional area, or volume of the ascending aorta during the follow-up of 3 years after TEVAR. Body height was a negative predictor for mean ascending aortic diameter (<em>P</em> value = −0.013; B = −8.890) and mean aortic diameter at the level of the brachiocephalic trunk (<em>P</em> value = 0.039; B = −14.763).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our data suggest no significant changes in the ascending aorta following TEVAR of the descending thoracic aorta during mid-term follow-up when under stringent blood pressure medication. Additionally, we did not find any modifiable risk factors for geometry parameter increase.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624004977/pdfft?md5=eda66e58adfcc64e1b7558b780cb5452&pid=1-s2.0-S0890509624004977-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624004977\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624004977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ascending Geometry After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Descending Aortic Dissection
Background
This study aimed to assess geometry changes of the ascending aorta after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending aortic dissection and identify potential risk factors for diameter and length change.
Methods
Between April 2009 and July 2021, 102 patients were treated for acute descending aortic dissections (type B and non-A non-B) with TEVAR and were included in this analysis. Computed tomography angiographic scans were transferred to a dedicated imaging software and detailed aortic measurements (including length, diameter and area) were taken in multiplanar reconstruction postoperatively, after 6 months and annually thereafter.
Results
Sixty-five (58%) patients were male, with a mean age of 66 (±11). Four (4%) patients were diagnosed with connective tissue disease. Before TEVAR, 79% of our patients were treated with a mean of 1.5 (±1.2) different classes of antihypertensive medications. This number rose to 98% after TEVAR and 2.7 (±1.0) different antihypertensive drugs. There was no significant change in length, diameter, cross-sectional area, or volume of the ascending aorta during the follow-up of 3 years after TEVAR. Body height was a negative predictor for mean ascending aortic diameter (P value = −0.013; B = −8.890) and mean aortic diameter at the level of the brachiocephalic trunk (P value = 0.039; B = −14.763).
Conclusions
Our data suggest no significant changes in the ascending aorta following TEVAR of the descending thoracic aorta during mid-term follow-up when under stringent blood pressure medication. Additionally, we did not find any modifiable risk factors for geometry parameter increase.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal:
Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials)
Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work)
Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients)
General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic)
Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery
Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers)
Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery)
Editorials/Correspondence