Ashvath Singh Kunadi, Richard P. Silberstein, Sally E. Thompson
{"title":"再论动量零平面位移和粗糙度长度的变化","authors":"Ashvath Singh Kunadi, Richard P. Silberstein, Sally E. Thompson","doi":"10.1007/s10546-024-00876-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zero plane displacement height (<span>\\(d_0\\)</span>) and momentum roughness length (<span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span>), describe the aerodynamic characteristics of a vegetated surface. Usually, <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span> are assumed to be constant functions of the physical characteristics of the surface. Prior evidence collected from the literature and our examination of flux tower data show that <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span> vary in time at sites with tree and shrub canopies, but not grasslands. The conventional explanations of these variations are based on linear functions of wind velocity and friction velocity, with little theoretical basis. This study explains the variation in aerodynamic parameters by matching four analytical canopy velocity models to a logarithmic above-canopy velocity profile at canopy height. <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span> come out as functions of 2 non-dimensional terms, the canopy momentum absorption capacity (parameter) and a (measurable) Péclet number. To test the theories of variation, we analysed the velocity profiles from Ozflux and Ameriflux sites. None of the theories could recreate <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span> at half-hourly intervals. However, the canopy velocity models were able better to recreate the distribution of the variations in <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span>. Additionally, the estimates of canopy momentum absorption capacity varied consistently with phenological changes in the canopies, whereas, the fitting parameters of the linear regression of using wind speed and friction velocity did not exhibit physically interpretable variations. The canopy velocity models may offer better predictions with an accurate estimation of the canopy height, a horizontally homogeneous and rigid canopy, and incorporation of the roughness sublayer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9153,"journal":{"name":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in Zero Plane Displacement and Roughness Length for Momentum Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Ashvath Singh Kunadi, Richard P. Silberstein, Sally E. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10546-024-00876-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Zero plane displacement height (<span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span>) and momentum roughness length (<span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span>), describe the aerodynamic characteristics of a vegetated surface. Usually, <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span> are assumed to be constant functions of the physical characteristics of the surface. Prior evidence collected from the literature and our examination of flux tower data show that <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span> vary in time at sites with tree and shrub canopies, but not grasslands. The conventional explanations of these variations are based on linear functions of wind velocity and friction velocity, with little theoretical basis. This study explains the variation in aerodynamic parameters by matching four analytical canopy velocity models to a logarithmic above-canopy velocity profile at canopy height. <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span> come out as functions of 2 non-dimensional terms, the canopy momentum absorption capacity (parameter) and a (measurable) Péclet number. To test the theories of variation, we analysed the velocity profiles from Ozflux and Ameriflux sites. None of the theories could recreate <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span> at half-hourly intervals. However, the canopy velocity models were able better to recreate the distribution of the variations in <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span>. Additionally, the estimates of canopy momentum absorption capacity varied consistently with phenological changes in the canopies, whereas, the fitting parameters of the linear regression of using wind speed and friction velocity did not exhibit physically interpretable variations. The canopy velocity models may offer better predictions with an accurate estimation of the canopy height, a horizontally homogeneous and rigid canopy, and incorporation of the roughness sublayer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boundary-Layer Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boundary-Layer Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00876-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00876-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variation in Zero Plane Displacement and Roughness Length for Momentum Revisited
Zero plane displacement height (\(d_0\)) and momentum roughness length (\(z_{0m}\)), describe the aerodynamic characteristics of a vegetated surface. Usually, \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\) are assumed to be constant functions of the physical characteristics of the surface. Prior evidence collected from the literature and our examination of flux tower data show that \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\) vary in time at sites with tree and shrub canopies, but not grasslands. The conventional explanations of these variations are based on linear functions of wind velocity and friction velocity, with little theoretical basis. This study explains the variation in aerodynamic parameters by matching four analytical canopy velocity models to a logarithmic above-canopy velocity profile at canopy height. \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\) come out as functions of 2 non-dimensional terms, the canopy momentum absorption capacity (parameter) and a (measurable) Péclet number. To test the theories of variation, we analysed the velocity profiles from Ozflux and Ameriflux sites. None of the theories could recreate \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\) at half-hourly intervals. However, the canopy velocity models were able better to recreate the distribution of the variations in \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\). Additionally, the estimates of canopy momentum absorption capacity varied consistently with phenological changes in the canopies, whereas, the fitting parameters of the linear regression of using wind speed and friction velocity did not exhibit physically interpretable variations. The canopy velocity models may offer better predictions with an accurate estimation of the canopy height, a horizontally homogeneous and rigid canopy, and incorporation of the roughness sublayer.
期刊介绍:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology offers several publishing options: Research Letters, Research Articles, and Notes and Comments. The Research Letters section is designed to allow quick dissemination of new scientific findings, with an initial review period of no longer than one month. The Research Articles section offers traditional scientific papers that present results and interpretations based on substantial research studies or critical reviews of ongoing research. The Notes and Comments section comprises occasional notes and comments on specific topics with no requirement for rapid publication. Research Letters are limited in size to five journal pages, including no more than three figures, and cannot contain supplementary online material; Research Articles are generally fifteen to twenty pages in length with no more than fifteen figures; Notes and Comments are limited to ten journal pages and five figures. Authors submitting Research Letters should include within their cover letter an explanation of the need for rapid publication. More information regarding all publication formats can be found in the recent Editorial ‘Introducing Research Letters to Boundary-Layer Meteorology’.