再论动量零平面位移和粗糙度长度的变化

IF 2.3 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Ashvath Singh Kunadi, Richard P. Silberstein, Sally E. Thompson
{"title":"再论动量零平面位移和粗糙度长度的变化","authors":"Ashvath Singh Kunadi, Richard P. Silberstein, Sally E. Thompson","doi":"10.1007/s10546-024-00876-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zero plane displacement height (<span>\\(d_0\\)</span>) and momentum roughness length (<span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span>), describe the aerodynamic characteristics of a vegetated surface. Usually, <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span> are assumed to be constant functions of the physical characteristics of the surface. Prior evidence collected from the literature and our examination of flux tower data show that <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span> vary in time at sites with tree and shrub canopies, but not grasslands. The conventional explanations of these variations are based on linear functions of wind velocity and friction velocity, with little theoretical basis. This study explains the variation in aerodynamic parameters by matching four analytical canopy velocity models to a logarithmic above-canopy velocity profile at canopy height. <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span> come out as functions of 2 non-dimensional terms, the canopy momentum absorption capacity (parameter) and a (measurable) Péclet number. To test the theories of variation, we analysed the velocity profiles from Ozflux and Ameriflux sites. None of the theories could recreate <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span> at half-hourly intervals. However, the canopy velocity models were able better to recreate the distribution of the variations in <span>\\(d_0\\)</span> and <span>\\(z_{0m}\\)</span>. Additionally, the estimates of canopy momentum absorption capacity varied consistently with phenological changes in the canopies, whereas, the fitting parameters of the linear regression of using wind speed and friction velocity did not exhibit physically interpretable variations. The canopy velocity models may offer better predictions with an accurate estimation of the canopy height, a horizontally homogeneous and rigid canopy, and incorporation of the roughness sublayer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9153,"journal":{"name":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in Zero Plane Displacement and Roughness Length for Momentum Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Ashvath Singh Kunadi, Richard P. Silberstein, Sally E. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10546-024-00876-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Zero plane displacement height (<span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span>) and momentum roughness length (<span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span>), describe the aerodynamic characteristics of a vegetated surface. Usually, <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span> are assumed to be constant functions of the physical characteristics of the surface. Prior evidence collected from the literature and our examination of flux tower data show that <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span> vary in time at sites with tree and shrub canopies, but not grasslands. The conventional explanations of these variations are based on linear functions of wind velocity and friction velocity, with little theoretical basis. This study explains the variation in aerodynamic parameters by matching four analytical canopy velocity models to a logarithmic above-canopy velocity profile at canopy height. <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span> come out as functions of 2 non-dimensional terms, the canopy momentum absorption capacity (parameter) and a (measurable) Péclet number. To test the theories of variation, we analysed the velocity profiles from Ozflux and Ameriflux sites. None of the theories could recreate <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span> at half-hourly intervals. However, the canopy velocity models were able better to recreate the distribution of the variations in <span>\\\\(d_0\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(z_{0m}\\\\)</span>. Additionally, the estimates of canopy momentum absorption capacity varied consistently with phenological changes in the canopies, whereas, the fitting parameters of the linear regression of using wind speed and friction velocity did not exhibit physically interpretable variations. The canopy velocity models may offer better predictions with an accurate estimation of the canopy height, a horizontally homogeneous and rigid canopy, and incorporation of the roughness sublayer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boundary-Layer Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boundary-Layer Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00876-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00876-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

零平面位移高度(\(d_0\))和动量粗糙度长度(\(z_{0m}\))描述了植被表面的空气动力特性。通常,\(d_0\)和\(z_{0m}\)被假定为表面物理特性的恒定函数。之前从文献中收集的证据和我们对通量塔数据的研究表明,在有乔木和灌木树冠的地点,\(d_0\) 和 \(z_{0m}\)会随时间变化,但草地不会。对这些变化的传统解释是基于风速和摩擦速度的线性函数,缺乏理论依据。本研究通过将四种冠层速度分析模型与冠层高度上的对数速度曲线相匹配来解释空气动力参数的变化。\(d_0\) 和 (z_{0m}\) 是树冠动量吸收能力(参数)和佩克莱特数(可测量)这两个非尺寸项的函数。为了检验变化理论,我们分析了来自 Ozflux 和 Ameriflux 站点的速度剖面。没有一个理论能够以每半小时为间隔重现 \(d_0\) 和 \(z_{0m}\) 。然而,冠层速度模型能够更好地再现(d_0)和(z_{0m})的变化分布。此外,树冠动量吸收能力的估计值随树冠的物候变化而变化,而利用风速和摩擦速度进行线性回归的拟合参数没有表现出物理上可解释的变化。如果能准确估算树冠高度、树冠在水平方向上均匀且坚硬,并结合粗糙度子层,树冠速度模型可能会提供更好的预测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Variation in Zero Plane Displacement and Roughness Length for Momentum Revisited

Variation in Zero Plane Displacement and Roughness Length for Momentum Revisited

Zero plane displacement height (\(d_0\)) and momentum roughness length (\(z_{0m}\)), describe the aerodynamic characteristics of a vegetated surface. Usually, \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\) are assumed to be constant functions of the physical characteristics of the surface. Prior evidence collected from the literature and our examination of flux tower data show that \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\) vary in time at sites with tree and shrub canopies, but not grasslands. The conventional explanations of these variations are based on linear functions of wind velocity and friction velocity, with little theoretical basis. This study explains the variation in aerodynamic parameters by matching four analytical canopy velocity models to a logarithmic above-canopy velocity profile at canopy height. \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\) come out as functions of 2 non-dimensional terms, the canopy momentum absorption capacity (parameter) and a (measurable) Péclet number. To test the theories of variation, we analysed the velocity profiles from Ozflux and Ameriflux sites. None of the theories could recreate \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\) at half-hourly intervals. However, the canopy velocity models were able better to recreate the distribution of the variations in \(d_0\) and \(z_{0m}\). Additionally, the estimates of canopy momentum absorption capacity varied consistently with phenological changes in the canopies, whereas, the fitting parameters of the linear regression of using wind speed and friction velocity did not exhibit physically interpretable variations. The canopy velocity models may offer better predictions with an accurate estimation of the canopy height, a horizontally homogeneous and rigid canopy, and incorporation of the roughness sublayer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Boundary-Layer Meteorology
Boundary-Layer Meteorology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
14.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Boundary-Layer Meteorology offers several publishing options: Research Letters, Research Articles, and Notes and Comments. The Research Letters section is designed to allow quick dissemination of new scientific findings, with an initial review period of no longer than one month. The Research Articles section offers traditional scientific papers that present results and interpretations based on substantial research studies or critical reviews of ongoing research. The Notes and Comments section comprises occasional notes and comments on specific topics with no requirement for rapid publication. Research Letters are limited in size to five journal pages, including no more than three figures, and cannot contain supplementary online material; Research Articles are generally fifteen to twenty pages in length with no more than fifteen figures; Notes and Comments are limited to ten journal pages and five figures. Authors submitting Research Letters should include within their cover letter an explanation of the need for rapid publication. More information regarding all publication formats can be found in the recent Editorial ‘Introducing Research Letters to Boundary-Layer Meteorology’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信