库诺-伯特兰比较法下的消费者环境意识与绿色研发补贴政策

IF 3.2 3区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Economics of Innovation and New Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1080/10438599.2024.2386169

Mingqing Xing, Sang-Ho Lee

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在不同市场竞争模式下，当企业采取绿色减排战略时，消费者环境意识对绿色研发补贴政策的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Consumer environmental awareness and green R&D subsidy policy under Cournot–Bertrand comparisons

This study examines the impacts of consumer environmental awareness on green R&D subsidy policies under different market competition modes when firms adopt green strategies for emissions-reduction ...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economics of Innovation and New Technology ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

3.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Economics of Innovation and New Technology is devoted to the theoretical and empirical analysis of the determinants and effects of innovation, new technology and technological knowledge. The journal aims to provide a bridge between different strands of literature and different contributions of economic theory and empirical economics. This bridge is built in two ways. First, by encouraging empirical research (including case studies, econometric work and historical research), evaluating existing economic theory, and suggesting appropriate directions for future effort in theoretical work. Second, by exploring ways of applying and testing existing areas of theory to the economics of innovation and new technology, and ways of using theoretical insights to inform data collection and other empirical research. The journal welcomes contributions across a wide range of issues concerned with innovation, including: the generation of new technological knowledge, innovation in product markets, process innovation, patenting, adoption, diffusion, innovation and technology policy, international competitiveness, standardization and network externalities, innovation and growth, technology transfer, innovation and market structure, innovation and the environment, and across a broad range of economic activity not just in ‘high technology’ areas. The journal is open to a variety of methodological approaches ranging from case studies to econometric exercises with sound theoretical modelling, empirical evidence both longitudinal and cross-sectional about technologies, regions, firms, industries and countries.