{"title":"感知认知负荷与阅读乐趣在决定阅读成就方面的纠结","authors":"Yuyang Cai, Xiao Peng, Qianwen Ge","doi":"10.1007/s11145-024-10580-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How students perceive the difficulty of a reading task may significantly influence their reading process and outcome. This perception of task difficulty is determined by the objective features of a reading task and their affective responses toward it. From the stance of cognitive load theory, the current study examined the interaction between students’ perceived difficulty of reading tasks and enjoyment of reading in determining reading achievement. Specifically, we examined the moderation of reading enjoyment on the relationship between perceived difficulty of reading tasks and reading achievement. We used the OECD Programme for International Students Achievement 2018 data of 469,194 15-year-old students (51% girls, <i>M</i> = 15.79, <i>SD</i> = 0.29) from 69 economies. Results of multilevel structural equation modeling with latent interactions indicated that (a) perceived cognitive load negatively predicted reading achievement, (b) enjoyment of reading negatively predicted perceived cognitive load and therefore benefited reading achievement, and (c) enjoyment of reading deteriorated the negative relation between perceived intrinsic load and reading achievement. Reading enjoyment seemed to be a double-edged sword to reading achievement. These results have practical implications for reading materials design and reading instruction as well as theoretical implications for understanding different aspects of cognitive load.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The tango between perceived cognitive load and enjoyment of reading in determining reading achievement\",\"authors\":\"Yuyang Cai, Xiao Peng, Qianwen Ge\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11145-024-10580-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>How students perceive the difficulty of a reading task may significantly influence their reading process and outcome. This perception of task difficulty is determined by the objective features of a reading task and their affective responses toward it. From the stance of cognitive load theory, the current study examined the interaction between students’ perceived difficulty of reading tasks and enjoyment of reading in determining reading achievement. Specifically, we examined the moderation of reading enjoyment on the relationship between perceived difficulty of reading tasks and reading achievement. We used the OECD Programme for International Students Achievement 2018 data of 469,194 15-year-old students (51% girls, <i>M</i> = 15.79, <i>SD</i> = 0.29) from 69 economies. Results of multilevel structural equation modeling with latent interactions indicated that (a) perceived cognitive load negatively predicted reading achievement, (b) enjoyment of reading negatively predicted perceived cognitive load and therefore benefited reading achievement, and (c) enjoyment of reading deteriorated the negative relation between perceived intrinsic load and reading achievement. Reading enjoyment seemed to be a double-edged sword to reading achievement. These results have practical implications for reading materials design and reading instruction as well as theoretical implications for understanding different aspects of cognitive load.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading and Writing\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading and Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10580-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10580-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The tango between perceived cognitive load and enjoyment of reading in determining reading achievement
How students perceive the difficulty of a reading task may significantly influence their reading process and outcome. This perception of task difficulty is determined by the objective features of a reading task and their affective responses toward it. From the stance of cognitive load theory, the current study examined the interaction between students’ perceived difficulty of reading tasks and enjoyment of reading in determining reading achievement. Specifically, we examined the moderation of reading enjoyment on the relationship between perceived difficulty of reading tasks and reading achievement. We used the OECD Programme for International Students Achievement 2018 data of 469,194 15-year-old students (51% girls, M = 15.79, SD = 0.29) from 69 economies. Results of multilevel structural equation modeling with latent interactions indicated that (a) perceived cognitive load negatively predicted reading achievement, (b) enjoyment of reading negatively predicted perceived cognitive load and therefore benefited reading achievement, and (c) enjoyment of reading deteriorated the negative relation between perceived intrinsic load and reading achievement. Reading enjoyment seemed to be a double-edged sword to reading achievement. These results have practical implications for reading materials design and reading instruction as well as theoretical implications for understanding different aspects of cognitive load.
期刊介绍:
Reading and writing skills are fundamental to literacy. Consequently, the processes involved in reading and writing and the failure to acquire these skills, as well as the loss of once well-developed reading and writing abilities have been the targets of intense research activity involving professionals from a variety of disciplines, such as neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics and education. The findings that have emanated from this research are most often written up in a lingua that is specific to the particular discipline involved, and are published in specialized journals. This generally leaves the expert in one area almost totally unaware of what may be taking place in any area other than their own. Reading and Writing cuts through this fog of jargon, breaking down the artificial boundaries between disciplines. The journal focuses on the interaction among various fields, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Reading and Writing publishes high-quality, scientific articles pertaining to the processes, acquisition, and loss of reading and writing skills. The journal fully represents the necessarily interdisciplinary nature of research in the field, focusing on the interaction among various disciplines, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Coverage in Reading and Writing includes models of reading, writing and spelling at all age levels; orthography and its relation to reading and writing; computer literacy; cross-cultural studies; and developmental and acquired disorders of reading and writing. It publishes research articles, critical reviews, theoretical papers, and case studies. Reading and Writing is one of the most highly cited journals in Education, Educational Research, and Educational Psychology.