{"title":"肉鸡日粮中高粱与不同蛋白质来源的代谢能和回肠氨基酸消化率的互补性和关联效应","authors":"A. Sultan, X. Li, D. Zhang, W. L. Bryden","doi":"10.1071/an24159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>Poultry diets consist of several ingredients contributing specific amounts of nutrients and it is assumed that the supply from each ingredient is additive when diets are formulated. However, the additivity of apparent metabolisable energy (AME) and ileal amino acid digestibility in broiler diets combining sorghum with different protein sources has not been examined.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>To determine the additivity of AME along with ileal digestibility values for protein and amino acids in diets combining sorghum with different protein sources.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>The digestibility assays, based on semi-purified diets containing sorghum, sunflower meal (SFM), meat and bone meal (MBM), soybean meal (SBM), canola meal (CM), and cottonseed meal (CSM), were fed individually, or sorghum was combined with the different protein sources. Each diet was fed to three cages of 12 17-day-old broilers for 7 days. Excreta was collected for the final 3 days and at the end of the assay, digesta was collected from the terminal ileum for digestibility determination.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>When sorghum was mixed with the different protein sources, all predicted values for protein digestibility were additive, but for AME only the value for sorghum + SFM was additive. All other predicted AME values for sorghum combinations were different (<i>P</i> < 0.05) from the determined value. There were significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) differences between predicted and determined amino acid digestibility coefficients, but amino acids showing associative effects varied among the different sorghum protein source combinations.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Overall, the present results indicated that caution should be exercised when predicting the AME and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility values for sorghum-based diets from values determined with individual feed ingredients.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>The study indicated that positive and negative interactions are likely to occur among dietary ingredients in mixed diets, which has implications for both energy and protein utilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7895,"journal":{"name":"Animal Production Science","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Additivity and associative effects of metabolisable energy and ileal amino acid digestibility in broiler diets combining sorghum with different protein sources\",\"authors\":\"A. Sultan, X. Li, D. Zhang, W. L. Bryden\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/an24159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong> Context</strong><p>Poultry diets consist of several ingredients contributing specific amounts of nutrients and it is assumed that the supply from each ingredient is additive when diets are formulated. However, the additivity of apparent metabolisable energy (AME) and ileal amino acid digestibility in broiler diets combining sorghum with different protein sources has not been examined.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>To determine the additivity of AME along with ileal digestibility values for protein and amino acids in diets combining sorghum with different protein sources.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>The digestibility assays, based on semi-purified diets containing sorghum, sunflower meal (SFM), meat and bone meal (MBM), soybean meal (SBM), canola meal (CM), and cottonseed meal (CSM), were fed individually, or sorghum was combined with the different protein sources. Each diet was fed to three cages of 12 17-day-old broilers for 7 days. Excreta was collected for the final 3 days and at the end of the assay, digesta was collected from the terminal ileum for digestibility determination.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>When sorghum was mixed with the different protein sources, all predicted values for protein digestibility were additive, but for AME only the value for sorghum + SFM was additive. All other predicted AME values for sorghum combinations were different (<i>P</i> < 0.05) from the determined value. There were significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) differences between predicted and determined amino acid digestibility coefficients, but amino acids showing associative effects varied among the different sorghum protein source combinations.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Overall, the present results indicated that caution should be exercised when predicting the AME and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility values for sorghum-based diets from values determined with individual feed ingredients.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>The study indicated that positive and negative interactions are likely to occur among dietary ingredients in mixed diets, which has implications for both energy and protein utilisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Production Science\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Production Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/an24159\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Production Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/an24159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Additivity and associative effects of metabolisable energy and ileal amino acid digestibility in broiler diets combining sorghum with different protein sources
Context
Poultry diets consist of several ingredients contributing specific amounts of nutrients and it is assumed that the supply from each ingredient is additive when diets are formulated. However, the additivity of apparent metabolisable energy (AME) and ileal amino acid digestibility in broiler diets combining sorghum with different protein sources has not been examined.
Aims
To determine the additivity of AME along with ileal digestibility values for protein and amino acids in diets combining sorghum with different protein sources.
Methods
The digestibility assays, based on semi-purified diets containing sorghum, sunflower meal (SFM), meat and bone meal (MBM), soybean meal (SBM), canola meal (CM), and cottonseed meal (CSM), were fed individually, or sorghum was combined with the different protein sources. Each diet was fed to three cages of 12 17-day-old broilers for 7 days. Excreta was collected for the final 3 days and at the end of the assay, digesta was collected from the terminal ileum for digestibility determination.
Key results
When sorghum was mixed with the different protein sources, all predicted values for protein digestibility were additive, but for AME only the value for sorghum + SFM was additive. All other predicted AME values for sorghum combinations were different (P < 0.05) from the determined value. There were significant (P < 0.05) differences between predicted and determined amino acid digestibility coefficients, but amino acids showing associative effects varied among the different sorghum protein source combinations.
Conclusions
Overall, the present results indicated that caution should be exercised when predicting the AME and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility values for sorghum-based diets from values determined with individual feed ingredients.
Implications
The study indicated that positive and negative interactions are likely to occur among dietary ingredients in mixed diets, which has implications for both energy and protein utilisation.
期刊介绍:
Research papers in Animal Production Science focus on improving livestock and food production, and on the social and economic issues that influence primary producers. The journal (formerly known as Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture) is predominantly concerned with domesticated animals (beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep, pigs, goats and poultry); however, contributions on horses and wild animals may be published where relevant.
Animal Production Science is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.