发酵床地板系统提高小农土猪生产的盈利能力

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Bounlerth Sivilai, Thonglai Vongpaserth, Juan Boo Liang
{"title":"发酵床地板系统提高小农土猪生产的盈利能力","authors":"Bounlerth Sivilai, Thonglai Vongpaserth, Juan Boo Liang","doi":"10.1071/an24061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>Traditional smallholder pig farming plays an important role in farmers’ income and national food security in the low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Asia including Laos; however, its productivity is low and it is often environmentally unsustainable.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of using fermented bed-floor housing compared with the conventional concrete-floor housing on growth, carcass treats and economic return on raising Laos native pigs.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>The study was conducted at the Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Laos. Twenty four castrated native pigs, aged ±3 months with initial liveweight of 17 ± 2 kg/head, were randomly assigned to the following housing types as treatments: (1) conventional concrete-floor system (CS) as control, and (2) fermented bed-flooring system (FB). The pigs were fed with similar diet with 16.01% crude protein and 11,796 kJ/kg gross energy for a period of 84 days after a 14-day adaptation to the feed. Each treatment was replicated four times (pens), with three pigs/pen. Data on feed intake, liveweight change, carcass trait and costs and returns of production in the two treatments were analysed using Student’s paired-sample <i>t</i>-test.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Pigs kept in FB flooring had higher DM and nutrient (crude protein, crude fibre, ether extract and organic matter) intakes than did their counterparts raised in the CS, but the differences were not significant when adjusted to bodyweight basis. There were also no significant differences in growth performance (average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR)), and carcass traits, except that pigs from FB had higher hot carcass weight, dressing percentage and rib and bone weights. Native pigs kept in the FB system had significantly higher total production costs because of the cost of the bedding material, but also had four-fold higher net income return generated from the sale of the fermented floor compost.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Fermented bed-flooring system has no significant impact on growth and key carcass traits, but significantly enhanced profit.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Fermented bed-flooring system should be promoted for rearing local pigs under smallholder farms to increase profit and protect the environment in the low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":7895,"journal":{"name":"Animal Production Science","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fermented bed flooring systems enhance profitability in smallholder native pig production\",\"authors\":\"Bounlerth Sivilai, Thonglai Vongpaserth, Juan Boo Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/an24061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong> Context</strong><p>Traditional smallholder pig farming plays an important role in farmers’ income and national food security in the low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Asia including Laos; however, its productivity is low and it is often environmentally unsustainable.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of using fermented bed-floor housing compared with the conventional concrete-floor housing on growth, carcass treats and economic return on raising Laos native pigs.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>The study was conducted at the Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Laos. Twenty four castrated native pigs, aged ±3 months with initial liveweight of 17 ± 2 kg/head, were randomly assigned to the following housing types as treatments: (1) conventional concrete-floor system (CS) as control, and (2) fermented bed-flooring system (FB). The pigs were fed with similar diet with 16.01% crude protein and 11,796 kJ/kg gross energy for a period of 84 days after a 14-day adaptation to the feed. Each treatment was replicated four times (pens), with three pigs/pen. Data on feed intake, liveweight change, carcass trait and costs and returns of production in the two treatments were analysed using Student’s paired-sample <i>t</i>-test.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Pigs kept in FB flooring had higher DM and nutrient (crude protein, crude fibre, ether extract and organic matter) intakes than did their counterparts raised in the CS, but the differences were not significant when adjusted to bodyweight basis. There were also no significant differences in growth performance (average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR)), and carcass traits, except that pigs from FB had higher hot carcass weight, dressing percentage and rib and bone weights. Native pigs kept in the FB system had significantly higher total production costs because of the cost of the bedding material, but also had four-fold higher net income return generated from the sale of the fermented floor compost.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Fermented bed-flooring system has no significant impact on growth and key carcass traits, but significantly enhanced profit.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Fermented bed-flooring system should be promoted for rearing local pigs under smallholder farms to increase profit and protect the environment in the low- and middle-income countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Production Science\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Production Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/an24061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Production Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/an24061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在包括老挝在内的东南亚中低收入国家,传统的小农养猪业在农民收入和国家粮食安全方面发挥着重要作用;然而,其生产率较低,而且往往在环境上不可持续。目的本研究的目的是评估与传统混凝土地板猪舍相比,发酵床地板猪舍对老挝土猪生长、胴体处理和经济回报的影响。方法该研究在老挝国立大学农学院进行。将 24 头年龄为 ±3 个月,初始活重为 17 ± 2 千克/头的阉割土猪随机分配到以下饲养类型作为处理:(1) 作为对照的传统混凝土地板系统(CS)和 (2) 发酵床地板系统(FB)。在对饲料进行 14 天的适应期后,用粗蛋白含量为 16.01%、毛能为 11,796 千焦/千克的类似日粮饲喂猪,为期 84 天。每种处理重复四次(栏),每栏三头猪。采用学生配对样本 t 检验法分析了两种处理的采食量、活重变化、胴体性状以及生产成本和收益等数据。主要结果FB地板饲养的猪的DM和营养物质(粗蛋白、粗纤维、醚提取物和有机物)摄入量高于CS地板饲养的猪,但按体重调整后差异不显著。生长性能(平均日增重(ADG)和饲料转化率(FCR))和胴体性状也没有显著差异,但 FB 猪的热胴体重量、拌料百分比、肋骨和骨骼重量较高。由于垫料成本的原因,FB 系统饲养的土猪的总生产成本明显较高,但其销售发酵地面堆肥所产生的净收入回报却高出四倍。结论发酵床垫料系统对生长和主要胴体性状没有显著影响,但能显著提高利润。意义在中低收入国家的小农农场饲养本地猪时,应推广发酵床垫系统,以增加利润并保护环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fermented bed flooring systems enhance profitability in smallholder native pig production
Context

Traditional smallholder pig farming plays an important role in farmers’ income and national food security in the low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Asia including Laos; however, its productivity is low and it is often environmentally unsustainable.

Aims

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of using fermented bed-floor housing compared with the conventional concrete-floor housing on growth, carcass treats and economic return on raising Laos native pigs.

Methods

The study was conducted at the Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Laos. Twenty four castrated native pigs, aged ±3 months with initial liveweight of 17 ± 2 kg/head, were randomly assigned to the following housing types as treatments: (1) conventional concrete-floor system (CS) as control, and (2) fermented bed-flooring system (FB). The pigs were fed with similar diet with 16.01% crude protein and 11,796 kJ/kg gross energy for a period of 84 days after a 14-day adaptation to the feed. Each treatment was replicated four times (pens), with three pigs/pen. Data on feed intake, liveweight change, carcass trait and costs and returns of production in the two treatments were analysed using Student’s paired-sample t-test.

Key results

Pigs kept in FB flooring had higher DM and nutrient (crude protein, crude fibre, ether extract and organic matter) intakes than did their counterparts raised in the CS, but the differences were not significant when adjusted to bodyweight basis. There were also no significant differences in growth performance (average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR)), and carcass traits, except that pigs from FB had higher hot carcass weight, dressing percentage and rib and bone weights. Native pigs kept in the FB system had significantly higher total production costs because of the cost of the bedding material, but also had four-fold higher net income return generated from the sale of the fermented floor compost.

Conclusions

Fermented bed-flooring system has no significant impact on growth and key carcass traits, but significantly enhanced profit.

Implications

Fermented bed-flooring system should be promoted for rearing local pigs under smallholder farms to increase profit and protect the environment in the low- and middle-income countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Production Science
Animal Production Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Research papers in Animal Production Science focus on improving livestock and food production, and on the social and economic issues that influence primary producers. The journal (formerly known as Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture) is predominantly concerned with domesticated animals (beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep, pigs, goats and poultry); however, contributions on horses and wild animals may be published where relevant. Animal Production Science is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信