生产力、投资放缓和配置不当:印度制造业的证据

IF 2.3 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS
Sarthak Basu, Subash Sasidharan
{"title":"生产力、投资放缓和配置不当:印度制造业的证据","authors":"Sarthak Basu, Subash Sasidharan","doi":"10.1007/s11123-024-00730-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using rich firm-level data of around 12,000 firms over 2004–2016, this study attempts to identify the factors responsible for the slowdown in gross investment and productivity in Indian manufacturing post-Global Financial Crisis. Our analysis reveals that the decline in investment is more pronounced for firms with higher productivity. Furthermore, we find evidence indicating a slowdown in the flow of capital and labor from less productive to more productive firms post-Global Financial Crisis. This indicates that a part of the fall in investment can be attributed to a decline in allocative efficiency, which is likely to have an impact on both aggregate productivity and income. Moreover, we probe into the causes behind the slowdown in the relationship between firm productivity, investment, capital and labor growth. We find that credit misallocation, financial constraints, age, and firm size played key roles in the investment slowdown. Finally, we present a counterfactual scenario by analyzing the extent of extra output and aggregate productivity that could be generated in the absence of misallocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Productivity Analysis","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity, investment slowdown, and misallocation: evidence from Indian manufacturing\",\"authors\":\"Sarthak Basu, Subash Sasidharan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11123-024-00730-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Using rich firm-level data of around 12,000 firms over 2004–2016, this study attempts to identify the factors responsible for the slowdown in gross investment and productivity in Indian manufacturing post-Global Financial Crisis. Our analysis reveals that the decline in investment is more pronounced for firms with higher productivity. Furthermore, we find evidence indicating a slowdown in the flow of capital and labor from less productive to more productive firms post-Global Financial Crisis. This indicates that a part of the fall in investment can be attributed to a decline in allocative efficiency, which is likely to have an impact on both aggregate productivity and income. Moreover, we probe into the causes behind the slowdown in the relationship between firm productivity, investment, capital and labor growth. We find that credit misallocation, financial constraints, age, and firm size played key roles in the investment slowdown. Finally, we present a counterfactual scenario by analyzing the extent of extra output and aggregate productivity that could be generated in the absence of misallocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Productivity Analysis\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Productivity Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-024-00730-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Productivity Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-024-00730-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用 2004-2016 年间约 12,000 家企业的丰富企业级数据,试图找出全球金融危机后印度制造业总投资和生产率放缓的原因。我们的分析表明,生产率较高的企业投资下降更为明显。此外,我们发现有证据表明,全球金融危机后,资本和劳动力从生产率较低的企业流向生产率较高的企业的速度放缓。这表明,投资下降的部分原因是分配效率的下降,而分配效率的下降很可能会对总体生产率和收入产生影响。此外,我们还探究了企业生产率、投资、资本和劳动力增长之间关系放缓的原因。我们发现,信贷分配不当、金融约束、年龄和企业规模在投资放缓中起到了关键作用。最后,我们通过分析在没有错配的情况下可能产生的额外产出和总生产率的程度,提出了一种反事实情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Productivity, investment slowdown, and misallocation: evidence from Indian manufacturing

Productivity, investment slowdown, and misallocation: evidence from Indian manufacturing

Using rich firm-level data of around 12,000 firms over 2004–2016, this study attempts to identify the factors responsible for the slowdown in gross investment and productivity in Indian manufacturing post-Global Financial Crisis. Our analysis reveals that the decline in investment is more pronounced for firms with higher productivity. Furthermore, we find evidence indicating a slowdown in the flow of capital and labor from less productive to more productive firms post-Global Financial Crisis. This indicates that a part of the fall in investment can be attributed to a decline in allocative efficiency, which is likely to have an impact on both aggregate productivity and income. Moreover, we probe into the causes behind the slowdown in the relationship between firm productivity, investment, capital and labor growth. We find that credit misallocation, financial constraints, age, and firm size played key roles in the investment slowdown. Finally, we present a counterfactual scenario by analyzing the extent of extra output and aggregate productivity that could be generated in the absence of misallocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Productivity Analysis publishes theoretical and applied research that addresses issues involving the measurement, explanation, and improvement of productivity. The broad scope of the journal encompasses productivity-related developments spanning the disciplines of economics, the management sciences, operations research, and business and public administration. Topics covered in the journal include, but are not limited to, productivity theory, organizational design, index number theory, and related foundations of productivity analysis. The journal also publishes research on computational methods that are employed in productivity analysis, including econometric and mathematical programming techniques, and empirical research based on data at all levels of aggregation, ranging from aggregate macroeconomic data to disaggregate microeconomic data. The empirical research illustrates the application of theory and techniques to the measurement of productivity, and develops implications for the design of managerial strategies and public policy to enhance productivity. Officially cited as: J Prod Anal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信